Boundary Spanning Methodological Approaches for Collaborative Moose Governance in Eeyou Istchee.

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Management Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-25 DOI:10.1007/s00267-023-01918-6
Nathan A Badry, Gwyneth A MacMillan, Eleanor R Stern, Manuelle Landry-Cuerrier, Gordon M Hickey, Murray M Humphries
{"title":"Boundary Spanning Methodological Approaches for Collaborative Moose Governance in Eeyou Istchee.","authors":"Nathan A Badry, Gwyneth A MacMillan, Eleanor R Stern, Manuelle Landry-Cuerrier, Gordon M Hickey, Murray M Humphries","doi":"10.1007/s00267-023-01918-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Natural resource governance challenges are often highly complex, particularly in Indigenous contexts. These challenges involve numerous landscape-level interactions, spanning jurisdictional, disciplinary, social, and ecological boundaries. In Eeyou Istchee, the James Bay Cree Territory of northern Quebec, Canada, traditional livelihoods depend on wild food species like moose. However, these species are increasingly being impacted by forestry and other resource development projects. The complex relationships between moose, resource development, and Cree livelihoods can limit shared understandings and the ability of diverse actors to respond to these pressures. Contributing to this complexity are the different knowledge systems held by governance actors who, while not always aligned, have broadly shared species conservation and sustainable development goals. This paper presents fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) as a methodological approach used to help elicit and interpret the knowledge of land-users concerning the impacts of forest management on moose habitat in Eeyou Istchee. We explore the difficulties of weaving this knowledge together with the results of moose GPS collar analysis and the knowledges of scientists and government agencies. The ways in which participatory, relational mapping approaches can be applied in practice, and what they offer to pluralistic natural resource governance research more widely, are then addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":"132-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11208253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01918-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural resource governance challenges are often highly complex, particularly in Indigenous contexts. These challenges involve numerous landscape-level interactions, spanning jurisdictional, disciplinary, social, and ecological boundaries. In Eeyou Istchee, the James Bay Cree Territory of northern Quebec, Canada, traditional livelihoods depend on wild food species like moose. However, these species are increasingly being impacted by forestry and other resource development projects. The complex relationships between moose, resource development, and Cree livelihoods can limit shared understandings and the ability of diverse actors to respond to these pressures. Contributing to this complexity are the different knowledge systems held by governance actors who, while not always aligned, have broadly shared species conservation and sustainable development goals. This paper presents fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) as a methodological approach used to help elicit and interpret the knowledge of land-users concerning the impacts of forest management on moose habitat in Eeyou Istchee. We explore the difficulties of weaving this knowledge together with the results of moose GPS collar analysis and the knowledges of scientists and government agencies. The ways in which participatory, relational mapping approaches can be applied in practice, and what they offer to pluralistic natural resource governance research more widely, are then addressed.

Abstract Image

Eeyou Istchee 麋鹿合作治理的跨界方法。
自然资源治理方面的挑战往往非常复杂,尤其是在土著环境中。这些挑战涉及众多景观层面的互动,跨越管辖、学科、社会和生态边界。在加拿大魁北克北部詹姆斯湾克里领地埃尤-伊斯特切,传统生计依赖于驼鹿等野生食物物种。然而,这些物种正日益受到林业和其他资源开发项目的影响。驼鹿、资源开发和克里人生计之间的复杂关系可能会限制不同参与者对这些压力的共同理解和应对能力。造成这种复杂性的原因是治理参与者拥有不同的知识体系,这些知识体系虽然并不总是一致的,但却有着广泛的物种保护和可持续发展目标。本文介绍了模糊认知图谱(FCM)这一方法论,该方法用于帮助获取和解释土地使用者关于森林管理对埃尤-伊斯特歇驼鹿栖息地影响的知识。我们探讨了将这些知识与驼鹿 GPS 颈圈分析结果以及科学家和政府机构的知识结合起来的困难。然后,我们探讨了参与式关系制图方法在实践中的应用方式,以及这些方法为更广泛的多元化自然资源治理研究提供了哪些帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信