Charlotte N. Shields, Chenab K. Khakh, G. Brandon Caudill, Carol L. Shields
{"title":"Patient perspectives on ocular oncology care at hybrid telehealth satellite offices","authors":"Charlotte N. Shields, Chenab K. Khakh, G. Brandon Caudill, Carol L. Shields","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2023.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess patient satisfaction with the hybrid telehealth model in patients undergoing follow-up care in ocular oncology.</p><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective survey study.</p><h3>Participants</h3><p>All patients who visited 1 of 2 satellite telehealth offices between July 2021 and October 2022 for their follow-up ocular oncology appointment.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 13-question online survey was completed for outcome measures of patient demographics, patient satisfaction with the satellite offices, and overall patient experience with telehealth.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The survey response rate was 32% (203 of 632)<em>.</em> The mean patient age was 65 years (median, 65 years), and 119 patients (58%) were female. A comparison (suburban satellite vs urban in-person office) revealed that the suburban satellite office had less difficulty in travel (3% vs 47%; <em>p</em> < 0.001) and less time commitment (<1 hour) for travel to the office (58% vs 23%; <em>p</em> < 0.001). On a scale (i.e., poor, fair, good, or excellent), the percentage of patients reported the following parameters as good or excellent: ease of finding satellite office (95%), check-in (94%), and time spent waiting for the doctor (72%). On a scale (i.e., extremely dissatisfied to extremely satisfied), the percentage of patients reported being extremely satisfied to the following parameters: the staff (81%) and the office overall (65%). Most patients (90%) would use this telehealth model for future visits (<em>p</em> < 0.0001), and 86% would recommend it to a friend (<em>p</em> < 0.0001).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this study on a hybrid telehealth satellite office model for ocular oncology follow-up examinations, patient satisfaction was high, most patients would use this form of examination in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":501659,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2023.11.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To assess patient satisfaction with the hybrid telehealth model in patients undergoing follow-up care in ocular oncology.
Design
Retrospective survey study.
Participants
All patients who visited 1 of 2 satellite telehealth offices between July 2021 and October 2022 for their follow-up ocular oncology appointment.
Methods
A 13-question online survey was completed for outcome measures of patient demographics, patient satisfaction with the satellite offices, and overall patient experience with telehealth.
Results
The survey response rate was 32% (203 of 632). The mean patient age was 65 years (median, 65 years), and 119 patients (58%) were female. A comparison (suburban satellite vs urban in-person office) revealed that the suburban satellite office had less difficulty in travel (3% vs 47%; p < 0.001) and less time commitment (<1 hour) for travel to the office (58% vs 23%; p < 0.001). On a scale (i.e., poor, fair, good, or excellent), the percentage of patients reported the following parameters as good or excellent: ease of finding satellite office (95%), check-in (94%), and time spent waiting for the doctor (72%). On a scale (i.e., extremely dissatisfied to extremely satisfied), the percentage of patients reported being extremely satisfied to the following parameters: the staff (81%) and the office overall (65%). Most patients (90%) would use this telehealth model for future visits (p < 0.0001), and 86% would recommend it to a friend (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion
In this study on a hybrid telehealth satellite office model for ocular oncology follow-up examinations, patient satisfaction was high, most patients would use this form of examination in the future.