Verbal relations in the context of university experience: An exploratory analysis using a relational density theoretical framework and case example

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Dana Paliliunas, Breanna Lee, Kam Barker, Madeline Caughron
{"title":"Verbal relations in the context of university experience: An exploratory analysis using a relational density theoretical framework and case example","authors":"Dana Paliliunas,&nbsp;Breanna Lee,&nbsp;Kam Barker,&nbsp;Madeline Caughron","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.100719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>College students report experiencing challenges to their mental health and wellbeing that impact their </span>academic performance<span> and experience in the university setting, however analyses of their verbal relations in the context of university experience are more limited. The present studies attempt to provide an exploratory analysis of the verbal experience of college students using a Relational Density Theory framework and a case example demonstrating the impact of a synthesized approach that targets both relational behavior and environmental context. In Study 1, we modeled relational frames related to university experience using a multidimensional scaling procedure. Participants were divided into groups based on reported psychological flexibility, and the differences between high- and low-flexibility groups were examined. In Study 2, we provide a case example of the effect of an intervention framework referred to as Values-Based Self-Management that targets psychological flexibility development and behavior change using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and self-management approaches on a participant's university experience, examining changes in participant psychological wellbeing, academic engagement, and performance, including a measure of relational behavior via the multidimensional scaling procedure. Results suggest improvements in self-reported and self-monitored variables as well as differences in relational behavior from pre-to post-test. Implications for assessment and intervention for college students are discussed, however the results of this study should be considered exploratory due to the novel procedures and limited sample.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100719"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144723001400","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

College students report experiencing challenges to their mental health and wellbeing that impact their academic performance and experience in the university setting, however analyses of their verbal relations in the context of university experience are more limited. The present studies attempt to provide an exploratory analysis of the verbal experience of college students using a Relational Density Theory framework and a case example demonstrating the impact of a synthesized approach that targets both relational behavior and environmental context. In Study 1, we modeled relational frames related to university experience using a multidimensional scaling procedure. Participants were divided into groups based on reported psychological flexibility, and the differences between high- and low-flexibility groups were examined. In Study 2, we provide a case example of the effect of an intervention framework referred to as Values-Based Self-Management that targets psychological flexibility development and behavior change using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and self-management approaches on a participant's university experience, examining changes in participant psychological wellbeing, academic engagement, and performance, including a measure of relational behavior via the multidimensional scaling procedure. Results suggest improvements in self-reported and self-monitored variables as well as differences in relational behavior from pre-to post-test. Implications for assessment and intervention for college students are discussed, however the results of this study should be considered exploratory due to the novel procedures and limited sample.

大学经历中的言语关系:利用关系密度理论框架和案例进行探索性分析
大学生报告说,他们的心理健康和幸福受到了挑战,这些挑战影响了他们的学业成绩和在大学的经历,但是对他们在大学经历中的言语关系的分析却比较有限。本研究试图利用关系密度理论框架对大学生的言语体验进行探索性分析,并通过一个案例来展示针对关系行为和环境背景的综合方法的影响。在研究 1 中,我们使用多维标度程序对与大学经历相关的关系框架进行了建模。根据所报告的心理灵活性将参与者分为若干组,并考察了高灵活性组和低灵活性组之间的差异。在研究2中,我们提供了一个案例,说明基于价值观的自我管理干预框架对参与者大学生活的影响,该干预框架以心理灵活性发展和行为改变为目标,采用了接纳与承诺疗法和自我管理方法,考察了参与者在心理健康、学业参与和成绩方面的变化,包括通过多维缩放程序对关系行为的测量。结果表明,从测试前到测试后,自我报告和自我监测变量以及关系行为的差异都有所改善。本研究讨论了对大学生进行评估和干预的意义,但由于程序新颖、样本有限,本研究的结果应被视为探索性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信