The Hygienic Quality of Meat Produced in a Lgeria: Meta-Analysis

N. Guergueb
{"title":"The Hygienic Quality of Meat Produced in a Lgeria: Meta-Analysis","authors":"N. Guergueb","doi":"10.2478/fv-2023-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This meta-analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the hygienic quality of meat in the context of Algerian meat production. A systematic literature search was conducted across various databases, yielding a pool of studies assessing the microbial contamination levels in different types of meat, including: poultry, beef, lamb, camel, sausages, and minced meat, within Algerian slaughterhouses and butcheries. A total of 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, with a combined sample size of 550 meat samples. The selected studies employed standardized methods for microbial enumeration: Total aerobic mesophilic bacteria (TAMB). The collected data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis models to estimate the pooled mean bacterial counts, as well as to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The results of this meta-analysis, revealed considerable variation in bacterial counts across different meat types and sources. The overall pooled, mean bacterial count was 5.15 colony-forming units per gram (CFU.g−1), with significant heterogeneity observed (I² = 87.52 %, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that bacterial counts were notably higher in butcher shops, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to improve hygiene practices in these areas. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the influence of individual studies on the overall results, and publication bias was evaluated through a funnel plot. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the hygienic quality of meat in Algerian meat production, emphasizing the significance of TAMB as an informative indicator. The observed variations in bacterial counts underscored the importance of hygiene practices throughout the meat supply chain, from farm to consumer.","PeriodicalId":81274,"journal":{"name":"Folia veterinaria","volume":"43 4","pages":"46 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia veterinaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fv-2023-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This meta-analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the hygienic quality of meat in the context of Algerian meat production. A systematic literature search was conducted across various databases, yielding a pool of studies assessing the microbial contamination levels in different types of meat, including: poultry, beef, lamb, camel, sausages, and minced meat, within Algerian slaughterhouses and butcheries. A total of 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, with a combined sample size of 550 meat samples. The selected studies employed standardized methods for microbial enumeration: Total aerobic mesophilic bacteria (TAMB). The collected data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis models to estimate the pooled mean bacterial counts, as well as to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The results of this meta-analysis, revealed considerable variation in bacterial counts across different meat types and sources. The overall pooled, mean bacterial count was 5.15 colony-forming units per gram (CFU.g−1), with significant heterogeneity observed (I² = 87.52 %, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that bacterial counts were notably higher in butcher shops, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to improve hygiene practices in these areas. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the influence of individual studies on the overall results, and publication bias was evaluated through a funnel plot. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the hygienic quality of meat in Algerian meat production, emphasizing the significance of TAMB as an informative indicator. The observed variations in bacterial counts underscored the importance of hygiene practices throughout the meat supply chain, from farm to consumer.
酵母菌生产的肉类的卫生质量:元分析
摘要 本荟萃分析旨在全面概述阿尔及利亚肉类生产中的肉类卫生质量。我们在各种数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,收集了大量评估阿尔及利亚屠宰场和肉联厂中不同类型肉类(包括家禽、牛肉、羊肉、骆驼肉、香肠和碎肉)微生物污染水平的研究。共有 25 项研究符合纳入标准,合计样本量为 550 个肉类样本。所选研究采用了标准化的微生物计数方法:需氧中嗜性细菌总数(TAMB)。利用随机效应荟萃分析模型对收集到的数据进行了综合分析,以估算细菌计数的总平均值,并探索潜在的异质性来源。这项荟萃分析的结果显示,不同肉类和不同来源的细菌数量差异很大。总体汇总的平均细菌计数为每克 5.15 个菌落形成单位(CFU.g-1),观察到显著的异质性(I² = 87.52 %,P < 0.001)。分组分析表明,肉店的细菌数量明显较高,这说明有必要采取有针对性的干预措施来改善这些地区的卫生习惯。此外,还进行了敏感性分析,以评估个别研究对总体结果的影响,并通过漏斗图评估了发表偏倚。总之,这项荟萃分析为阿尔及利亚肉类生产中的肉类卫生质量提供了有价值的见解,强调了 TAMB 作为信息指标的重要性。观察到的细菌数量变化强调了从农场到消费者的整个肉类供应链中卫生操作的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信