A machine learning pipeline for efficient differentiation between bipolar and major depressive disorder based on multimodal structural neuroimaging

Federico Calesella , Federica Colombo , Beatrice Bravi , Lidia Fortaner-Uyà , Camilla Monopoli , Sara Poletti , Emma Tassi , Eleonora Maggioni , Paolo Brambilla , Cristina Colombo , Irene Bollettini , Francesco Benedetti , Benedetta Vai
{"title":"A machine learning pipeline for efficient differentiation between bipolar and major depressive disorder based on multimodal structural neuroimaging","authors":"Federico Calesella ,&nbsp;Federica Colombo ,&nbsp;Beatrice Bravi ,&nbsp;Lidia Fortaner-Uyà ,&nbsp;Camilla Monopoli ,&nbsp;Sara Poletti ,&nbsp;Emma Tassi ,&nbsp;Eleonora Maggioni ,&nbsp;Paolo Brambilla ,&nbsp;Cristina Colombo ,&nbsp;Irene Bollettini ,&nbsp;Francesco Benedetti ,&nbsp;Benedetta Vai","doi":"10.1016/j.nsa.2023.103931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to the overlapping depressive symptomatology with major depressive disorder (MDD), 60% of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) are initially misdiagnosed, calling for the definition of reliable biomarkers that can support the diagnostic process. Here, we optimized a machine learning pipeline for the differentiation between depressed BD and MDD patients based on multimodal structural neuroimaging features. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were acquired for 282 depressed BD (n = 180) and MDD (n = 102) patients. Images were preprocessed to obtain axial (AD), radial (RD), mean (MD) diffusivity, fractional anisotropy (FA), and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) maps. Each feature was entered separately into a 5-fold nested cross-validated predictive pipeline differentiating between BD and MDD patients, comprising: confound regression for nuisance variables removal, feature standardization, principal component analysis for feature reduction, and an elastic-net penalized regression. The DTI-based models reached accuracies ranging from 75% to 78%, whereas the VBM model reached 61% of accuracy. All the models were significantly different from a null model distribution at a 5000-permutation test. A 5000 bootstrap procedure revealed that widespread differences drove the classification, with BD patients associated to overall higher values of AD and FA, and grey matter volumes. Our results suggest that structural neuroimaging, in particular white matter microstructure and grey matter volumes, may be able to differentiate between MDD and BD patients with good predictive accuracy, being significantly higher than chance-level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100952,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Applied","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 103931"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772408523029137/pdfft?md5=4ae53c21a2570d689b748b56bb864848&pid=1-s2.0-S2772408523029137-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Applied","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772408523029137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the overlapping depressive symptomatology with major depressive disorder (MDD), 60% of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) are initially misdiagnosed, calling for the definition of reliable biomarkers that can support the diagnostic process. Here, we optimized a machine learning pipeline for the differentiation between depressed BD and MDD patients based on multimodal structural neuroimaging features. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were acquired for 282 depressed BD (n = 180) and MDD (n = 102) patients. Images were preprocessed to obtain axial (AD), radial (RD), mean (MD) diffusivity, fractional anisotropy (FA), and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) maps. Each feature was entered separately into a 5-fold nested cross-validated predictive pipeline differentiating between BD and MDD patients, comprising: confound regression for nuisance variables removal, feature standardization, principal component analysis for feature reduction, and an elastic-net penalized regression. The DTI-based models reached accuracies ranging from 75% to 78%, whereas the VBM model reached 61% of accuracy. All the models were significantly different from a null model distribution at a 5000-permutation test. A 5000 bootstrap procedure revealed that widespread differences drove the classification, with BD patients associated to overall higher values of AD and FA, and grey matter volumes. Our results suggest that structural neuroimaging, in particular white matter microstructure and grey matter volumes, may be able to differentiate between MDD and BD patients with good predictive accuracy, being significantly higher than chance-level.

基于多模态结构神经成像的机器学习管道,有效区分双相情感障碍和重度抑郁障碍
由于抑郁症状与重度抑郁障碍(MDD)重叠,60%的双相情感障碍(BD)患者最初会被误诊,这就要求定义可靠的生物标志物来支持诊断过程。在此,我们优化了基于多模态结构神经影像特征的机器学习管道,用于区分抑郁型双相情感障碍(BD)和重度双相情感障碍(MDD)患者。我们采集了 282 名 BD 抑郁症患者(180 人)和 MDD 患者(102 人)的弥散张量成像(DTI)和 T1 加权磁共振成像(MRI)数据。对图像进行预处理,以获得轴向 (AD)、径向 (RD)、平均 (MD) 扩散率、分数各向异性 (FA) 和基于体素的形态测量 (VBM) 图。每个特征都被分别输入到区分 BD 和 MDD 患者的 5 倍嵌套交叉验证预测管道中,其中包括:去除干扰变量的混淆回归、特征标准化、减少特征的主成分分析和弹性网惩罚回归。基于 DTI 的模型准确率为 75% 到 78%,而 VBM 模型的准确率为 61%。在 5000 次畸变测试中,所有模型都与空模型分布有明显差异。5000 次引导程序显示,广泛的差异推动了分类,BD 患者的 AD 值、FA 值和灰质体积总体较高。我们的研究结果表明,神经影像结构,尤其是白质微结构和灰质体积,可以很好地区分 MDD 和 BD 患者,其预测准确率明显高于偶然水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信