Plant Benefit Perceptions Influence Consumers' Likelihood to Buy and Differs across Age Cohorts

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Alicia L. Rihn, B. Behe
{"title":"Plant Benefit Perceptions Influence Consumers' Likelihood to Buy and Differs across Age Cohorts","authors":"Alicia L. Rihn, B. Behe","doi":"10.24266/0738-2898-41.4.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Plants provide many benefits (e.g., social, physiological, emotional, mental) but some consumers may be unaware of those benefits. Here, we investigate the effects of social, physiological, and emotional and mental health benefits of plants on consumers’ likelihood to buy (LTB) a plant based on those messages. A sample of 497 Americans participated in an online survey in 2021. All three plant benefit messages increased consumers’ LTB a plant, but differences were observed among age cohorts. Compared to the oldest age cohort (consumers born before 1965), Generation Z (born after 1996) responded most positively to the emotional and mental health benefit message followed by the physiological benefit, but did not respond to the social benefit. Compared to the older cohort, Millennials (persons born between 1981–1996) responded more favorably to all three benefit messages. Generation X (people born between 1965–1980) responded favorably to the emotional and mental health benefit message followed by the social benefit but not the physiological benefit. Generally, as education level and income increased, effects of the plant benefit messages decreased. Respondents who made plant purchases online responded favorably to the emotional and mental health plant benefits. Individuals who did not buy any plants did not respond favorably to any of the plant benefit messages. Plant sellers should employ benefit messages tailored to the age cohort target market(s) for the greatest impact.","PeriodicalId":15780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental horticulture","volume":"284 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-41.4.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plants provide many benefits (e.g., social, physiological, emotional, mental) but some consumers may be unaware of those benefits. Here, we investigate the effects of social, physiological, and emotional and mental health benefits of plants on consumers’ likelihood to buy (LTB) a plant based on those messages. A sample of 497 Americans participated in an online survey in 2021. All three plant benefit messages increased consumers’ LTB a plant, but differences were observed among age cohorts. Compared to the oldest age cohort (consumers born before 1965), Generation Z (born after 1996) responded most positively to the emotional and mental health benefit message followed by the physiological benefit, but did not respond to the social benefit. Compared to the older cohort, Millennials (persons born between 1981–1996) responded more favorably to all three benefit messages. Generation X (people born between 1965–1980) responded favorably to the emotional and mental health benefit message followed by the social benefit but not the physiological benefit. Generally, as education level and income increased, effects of the plant benefit messages decreased. Respondents who made plant purchases online responded favorably to the emotional and mental health plant benefits. Individuals who did not buy any plants did not respond favorably to any of the plant benefit messages. Plant sellers should employ benefit messages tailored to the age cohort target market(s) for the greatest impact.
对植物益处的认知影响消费者的购买意愿,并因年龄组而异
植物有很多益处(如社交、生理、情感和心理),但有些消费者可能并不知道这些益处。在此,我们根据这些信息调查了植物的社会、生理、情感和心理健康益处对消费者购买(LTB)植物的可能性的影响。2021 年,497 名美国人参与了一项在线调查。所有三种植物益处信息都增加了消费者购买植物的可能性,但不同年龄段的消费者购买植物的可能性存在差异。与年龄最大的群体(1965 年以前出生的消费者)相比,Z 世代(1996 年以后出生的消费者)对情感和心理健康益处信息的反应最为积极,其次是生理益处,但对社交益处没有反应。与老一代人相比,"千禧一代"(1981-1996 年出生的人)对所有三项益处信息的反应都更积极。X 代人(1965-1980 年出生的人)对情感和心理健康益处的反应较好,其次是社会益处,但对生理益处没有反应。一般来说,随着教育水平和收入的提高,植物益处信息的效果会下降。在网上购买植物的受访者对植物的情感和心理健康益处反应良好。没有购买任何植物的受访者对任何植物益处信息都没有好感。植物销售商应针对目标市场的年龄群定制植物益处信息,以达到最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental horticulture
Journal of environmental horticulture Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信