Analysis and evaluation of the current state of sanitary and parasitological methods of soil investigation

M. M. Aslanova, A. V. Zagainova, T. R. Maniya, Daria V. Rakitina, I. Abramov, I. Kurbatova, O. Savostikova
{"title":"Analysis and evaluation of the current state of sanitary and parasitological methods of soil investigation","authors":"M. M. Aslanova, A. V. Zagainova, T. R. Maniya, Daria V. Rakitina, I. Abramov, I. Kurbatova, O. Savostikova","doi":"10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-11-1255-1260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The unregulated use of undisinfected sewage, their sludge, manure and runoff from livestock farms plays a leading role in the contamination of soil, agricultural, vegetable, and berry crops with invasive material, creating a high risk of infection for people and animals with pathogens of helminthiases and intestinal protozoal diseases. \nThe purpose of the research was to analyze and evaluate the current state of the presented sanitary and parasitological methods for studying soils. \nMaterials and methods. The material was retrospectively analyzed literary data, state reports of Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing on the pollution of residential soils for 2019–2021. \nResults. As part of the experimental studies, there was made an assessment of approved sanitary and parasitological methods for studying soils, modern PCR methods and the patented IFM-IMS. The following results were obtained: Lamblia intestinalis, Toxocara spp. failed to be detected by Romanenko’s method found in 33.8% of cases, by Padchenko’s method Lamblia intestinalis – in 21.2% of cases, Toxocara spp. not detected, by the patented IMS-IFM method Lamblia intestinalis were found in 75.4%, Toxocara spp. – in 69.7%, by PCR , Lamblia intestinalis – in 11.4%, and Toxocara spp – in 34.1%. \nLimitations are related to the use in our own experimental studies of 2 types of parasitic agents – geohelminth eggs Toxocara spp. and cysts of the protozoan Lamblia intestinalis, as well as 2 types of soils, while data from state reports of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing contain the results of sanitary and parasitological control over the entire range of pathogens detected in various types of soils of the Russian Federation. \nConclusion. It seems promising to introduce new parasitological soil research methods along with those approved to obtain a more complete and reliable picture of the level of parasitic contamination of soils in the Russian Federation for the timely implementation of stages of preventive measures.","PeriodicalId":13009,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and sanitation","volume":"492 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and sanitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-11-1255-1260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The unregulated use of undisinfected sewage, their sludge, manure and runoff from livestock farms plays a leading role in the contamination of soil, agricultural, vegetable, and berry crops with invasive material, creating a high risk of infection for people and animals with pathogens of helminthiases and intestinal protozoal diseases. The purpose of the research was to analyze and evaluate the current state of the presented sanitary and parasitological methods for studying soils. Materials and methods. The material was retrospectively analyzed literary data, state reports of Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing on the pollution of residential soils for 2019–2021. Results. As part of the experimental studies, there was made an assessment of approved sanitary and parasitological methods for studying soils, modern PCR methods and the patented IFM-IMS. The following results were obtained: Lamblia intestinalis, Toxocara spp. failed to be detected by Romanenko’s method found in 33.8% of cases, by Padchenko’s method Lamblia intestinalis – in 21.2% of cases, Toxocara spp. not detected, by the patented IMS-IFM method Lamblia intestinalis were found in 75.4%, Toxocara spp. – in 69.7%, by PCR , Lamblia intestinalis – in 11.4%, and Toxocara spp – in 34.1%. Limitations are related to the use in our own experimental studies of 2 types of parasitic agents – geohelminth eggs Toxocara spp. and cysts of the protozoan Lamblia intestinalis, as well as 2 types of soils, while data from state reports of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing contain the results of sanitary and parasitological control over the entire range of pathogens detected in various types of soils of the Russian Federation. Conclusion. It seems promising to introduce new parasitological soil research methods along with those approved to obtain a more complete and reliable picture of the level of parasitic contamination of soils in the Russian Federation for the timely implementation of stages of preventive measures.
分析和评估土壤调查的卫生学和寄生虫学方法的现状
导言。无节制地使用未经消毒的污水、污泥、粪便和畜牧场的径流,是土壤、农作物、蔬菜和浆果作物受到外来物质污染的主要原因,极易造成人畜感染蠕虫病和肠道原生动物疾病。这项研究的目的是分析和评估目前用于研究土壤的卫生学和寄生虫学方法的现状。材料和方法。材料是通过回顾性分析文学资料、联邦消费者权益保护和人类福祉监督局关于2019-2021年居民土壤污染情况的州报告。结果。作为实验研究的一部分,对经批准的研究土壤的卫生学和寄生虫学方法、现代 PCR 方法和专利 IFM-IMS 进行了评估。结果如下在 33.8%的病例中,用 Romanenko 的方法未能检测到 Lamblia intestinalis 和 Toxocara spp.;在 21.2%的病例中,用 Padchenko 的方法未能检测到 Lamblia intestinalis 和 Toxocara spp.;在获得专利的 IMS-IFM 方法中,75.4%的病例中发现了 Lamblia intestinalis,69.7%的病例中发现了 Toxocara spp.;在 PCR 方法中,11.4%的病例中发现了 Lamblia intestinalis,34.1%的病例中发现了 Toxocara spp.。局限性在于我们自己的实验研究只使用了 2 种寄生虫--弓形虫卵和原生动物 Lamblia intestinalis 的包囊,以及 2 种土壤,而联邦消费者权益保护和人类福祉监督局的国家报告中的数据包含了对俄罗斯联邦各类土壤中检测到的所有病原体进行卫生学和寄生虫学控制的结果。结论在已获批准的土壤寄生虫学研究方法的基础上,引入新的土壤寄生虫学研究方法,以便更全面、 更可靠地了解俄罗斯联邦土壤寄生虫污染程度,及时实施阶段性预防措施,似乎是大有可为的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信