CHONDROREGENERATIVE POTENTIAL ON SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTATION OF PLATELET-RICH FIBRIN (PRF)-IMPREGNATED DECELLULARIZED BOVINE CARTILAGE SCAFFOLD

P. Widyatmika, M. S. Noer, Magda Rosalina Hutagalung
{"title":"CHONDROREGENERATIVE POTENTIAL ON SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTATION OF PLATELET-RICH FIBRIN (PRF)-IMPREGNATED DECELLULARIZED BOVINE CARTILAGE SCAFFOLD","authors":"P. Widyatmika, M. S. Noer, Magda Rosalina Hutagalung","doi":"10.20473/jscrte.v7i2.52555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discovery of alternative implants with regenerative potential comparable to autologous cartilage continues to be encouraged because of the high donor site morbidity rate. This research tries to make an alternative implant that uses the concept of tissue engineering techniques in the form of endogenous regeneration by combining Decellularized Bovine Cartilage scaffold with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (BCPRF) which is implanted subcutaneously. The aim of this study was to compare the potential for chondroregeneration between BCPRF and autologous cartilage as assessed by chondrocyte cell formation, type 2 collagen thickness, and implant resorption rate in subcutaneous implantation. Using the research design method is a pretest-posttest control group design using New Zealand white rabbits. Forty eight experimental samples were divided into 2 groups which were treated with BCPRF and autologous cartilage implantation. Results were evaluated after 6 weeks. Evaluation was carried out on 39 samples. Microscopy showed better potential for autologous cartilage chondroregeneration than BCPRF with significant differences in the number of chondrocytes formed, the thickness of type 2 collagen (p=0.000), and the rate of implant resorption (p=0.000). In conclusion, the potential for chondroregeneration of autologous cartilage and BCPRF is significantly different in terms of the number of chondrocytes formed, the thickness of type 2 collagen, and the rate of implant resorption.","PeriodicalId":17049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stem Cell Research and Tissue Engineering","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stem Cell Research and Tissue Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jscrte.v7i2.52555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The discovery of alternative implants with regenerative potential comparable to autologous cartilage continues to be encouraged because of the high donor site morbidity rate. This research tries to make an alternative implant that uses the concept of tissue engineering techniques in the form of endogenous regeneration by combining Decellularized Bovine Cartilage scaffold with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (BCPRF) which is implanted subcutaneously. The aim of this study was to compare the potential for chondroregeneration between BCPRF and autologous cartilage as assessed by chondrocyte cell formation, type 2 collagen thickness, and implant resorption rate in subcutaneous implantation. Using the research design method is a pretest-posttest control group design using New Zealand white rabbits. Forty eight experimental samples were divided into 2 groups which were treated with BCPRF and autologous cartilage implantation. Results were evaluated after 6 weeks. Evaluation was carried out on 39 samples. Microscopy showed better potential for autologous cartilage chondroregeneration than BCPRF with significant differences in the number of chondrocytes formed, the thickness of type 2 collagen (p=0.000), and the rate of implant resorption (p=0.000). In conclusion, the potential for chondroregeneration of autologous cartilage and BCPRF is significantly different in terms of the number of chondrocytes formed, the thickness of type 2 collagen, and the rate of implant resorption.
皮下植入富血小板纤维蛋白(prf)浸渍脱细胞牛软骨支架的软骨再生潜力
由于供体部位的高发病率,人们一直在鼓励发现具有与自体软骨相媲美的再生潜力的替代植入物。本研究试图通过将脱细胞牛软骨支架与血小板富集纤维蛋白(BCPRF)相结合,制成一种替代性植入物,以内源性再生的形式使用组织工程技术的概念,并将其植入皮下。本研究的目的是比较 BCPRF 和自体软骨的软骨再生潜力,评估指标包括软骨细胞形成、2 型胶原厚度和皮下植入的植入物吸收率。研究设计方法是使用新西兰白兔进行前测-后测对照组设计。48 只实验样本被分为两组,分别接受 BCPRF 和自体软骨植入治疗。6 周后对结果进行评估。对 39 个样本进行了评估。显微镜检查显示,自体软骨的软骨再生潜力优于 BCPRF,在形成的软骨细胞数量、2 型胶原厚度(P=0.000)和植入物吸收率(P=0.000)方面均有显著差异。总之,自体软骨和 BCPRF 的软骨再生潜力在形成的软骨细胞数量、2 型胶原厚度和植入物吸收率方面存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信