Attitude towards oneself, criminal punishment and victim of a crime as a predictor of a criminalization personality

K. Zlokazov
{"title":"Attitude towards oneself, criminal punishment and victim of a crime as a predictor of a criminalization personality","authors":"K. Zlokazov","doi":"10.35750/2713-0622-2023-4-413-428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Criminalisation negatively affects the well-being of society and personality, worsening and restricting progress and hindering their functioning and development. Scientific ideas about criminalisation are based on the regulations of individually-psychological and social approaches. The possibilities of the subjective approach are not fully used to study criminalisation, but they are useful, as they can reveal subjective components of the determination and regulation of criminal behavior. The development of subjective approach within the framework of research allows us to substantiate theoretically the combination of relations involved in regulation of behavior and to develop a model of these relations for assessing risk of criminalisation. \nThe aim of study is a theoretical substantiation of set of subjective relations indicating a risk of personality criminalisation and its empirical verification. For this purpose, the study examines a model of personality attitudes affecting its criminalisation, having developed on the basis of theoretical analysis of domestic and foreign researchers' ideas about criminogenic personality, criminogenic orientation and regulation of criminal behavior. \nMethodology, methods and techniques. The methodological basis of the study is a subjective approach (S.L. Rubinstein, A.V. Brushlinsky, K.A. Abulkhanova), value-normative theory of criminal behavior (A.R. Ratinov), provisions about criminogenic propensity of personality (A.N. Pastushenya). \nThe empirical study is aimed at verifying the interconnection of subjective attitudes indicating the criminalisation of personality. \nThe method of collecting data is the questionnaire \"Risk of Criminalisation\", the structure of which is formed by five scales which totally include 60 questions. The method of processing results: descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, nonparametric criterion of differences Kruskal-Wallis-H criteria test. \nThe study sample: 618 people divided into law-abiding (n=202 people) and criminogenic group, having been divided in its turn by the criterion of repeated criminal responsibility into subgroups of situation-criminogenic persons (n=219 people) and consecutive-criminogenic persons (n=197 people). The criminogenic persons were administratively supervised by law enforcement bodies of the Russian Federation. \nResults: criminalising significance of subjective attitudes set of super-valuable attitude to the self, devaluing attitude to punishment and cynically accusing attitude to the victim was confirmed. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, an adjusted scale suitable for assessing the risk of criminalisation was obtained, and some information about its reliability and validity was obtained.","PeriodicalId":442265,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Deviant Behavior","volume":"1 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Deviant Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2023-4-413-428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Criminalisation negatively affects the well-being of society and personality, worsening and restricting progress and hindering their functioning and development. Scientific ideas about criminalisation are based on the regulations of individually-psychological and social approaches. The possibilities of the subjective approach are not fully used to study criminalisation, but they are useful, as they can reveal subjective components of the determination and regulation of criminal behavior. The development of subjective approach within the framework of research allows us to substantiate theoretically the combination of relations involved in regulation of behavior and to develop a model of these relations for assessing risk of criminalisation. The aim of study is a theoretical substantiation of set of subjective relations indicating a risk of personality criminalisation and its empirical verification. For this purpose, the study examines a model of personality attitudes affecting its criminalisation, having developed on the basis of theoretical analysis of domestic and foreign researchers' ideas about criminogenic personality, criminogenic orientation and regulation of criminal behavior. Methodology, methods and techniques. The methodological basis of the study is a subjective approach (S.L. Rubinstein, A.V. Brushlinsky, K.A. Abulkhanova), value-normative theory of criminal behavior (A.R. Ratinov), provisions about criminogenic propensity of personality (A.N. Pastushenya). The empirical study is aimed at verifying the interconnection of subjective attitudes indicating the criminalisation of personality. The method of collecting data is the questionnaire "Risk of Criminalisation", the structure of which is formed by five scales which totally include 60 questions. The method of processing results: descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, nonparametric criterion of differences Kruskal-Wallis-H criteria test. The study sample: 618 people divided into law-abiding (n=202 people) and criminogenic group, having been divided in its turn by the criterion of repeated criminal responsibility into subgroups of situation-criminogenic persons (n=219 people) and consecutive-criminogenic persons (n=197 people). The criminogenic persons were administratively supervised by law enforcement bodies of the Russian Federation. Results: criminalising significance of subjective attitudes set of super-valuable attitude to the self, devaluing attitude to punishment and cynically accusing attitude to the victim was confirmed. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, an adjusted scale suitable for assessing the risk of criminalisation was obtained, and some information about its reliability and validity was obtained.
对自己、刑事处罚和犯罪受害者的态度是犯罪化人格的预测因素
导言。刑事犯罪对社会和个人的福祉产生了负面影响,恶化和限制了进步,阻碍了他们的运作和发展。关于刑事犯罪的科学观点是建立在个人心理和社会方法的基础上的。主观方法的可能性并没有完全用于研究犯罪问题,但它们是有用的,因为它们可以揭示决定和调节犯罪行为的主观因素。在研究框架内发展主观方法,使我们能够从理论上证实行为调节所涉及的各种关系,并为评估犯罪风险建立这些关系的模型。研究的目的是对表明人格犯罪风险的一系列主观关系进行理论论证和实证验证。为此,本研究在对国内外研究人员关于犯罪人格、犯罪倾向和犯罪行为调节的观点进行理论分析的基础上,建立了影响犯罪人格的人格态度模型。方法、方法和技术。研究的方法论基础是主观方法(S.L. Rubinstein、A.V. Brushlinsky、K.A. Abulkhanova)、犯罪行为的价值规范理论(A.R. Ratinov)、关于犯罪倾向的人格规定(A.N. Pastushenya)。实证研究旨在验证表明人格犯罪的主观态度之间的相互联系。收集数据的方法是 "犯罪风险 "问卷,其结构由五个量表组成,共包括 60 个问题。结果处理方法:描述性统计、确认性因素分析、非参数差异标准 Kruskal-Wallis-H 标准检验。研究样本:618 人,分为守法群体(202 人)和犯罪倾向群体,根据重复刑事责任标准又分为情况犯罪倾向者(219 人)和连续犯罪倾向者(197 人)。犯罪倾向者由俄罗斯联邦执法机构进行行政监督。结果:证实了主观态度的犯罪化意义,包括对自我的超价值态度、对惩罚的贬低态度和对受害者的冷嘲热讽态度。通过确认性因素分析,获得了适合评估犯罪风险的调整量表,并获得了有关其可靠性和有效性的一些信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信