Renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and percutaneous cryoablation of clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma – A prospective study

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Louise A Duus, T. Junker, Benjamin Schnack Brandt Rasmussen, M. Vilstrup, Lars Lund, Michael Pedersen, Ole Graumann
{"title":"Renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and percutaneous cryoablation of clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma – A prospective study","authors":"Louise A Duus, T. Junker, Benjamin Schnack Brandt Rasmussen, M. Vilstrup, Lars Lund, Michael Pedersen, Ole Graumann","doi":"10.25259/jcis_66_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe objective of this study was to investigate renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) in clinical stage T1 (cT1) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and evaluate the relationship between baseline renal function and renal functional outcome.\n\n\n\nPatients with cT1 RCC treated with RAPN or PCA were prospectively enrolled between June 2019 and January 2021. Renal function was evaluated using estimated glomerular filtration rate, Tc-99m diethylenetriamine-pentaacetate plasma clearance, Tc-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine renography, and renal volume at baseline and 6 months after treatment.\n\n\n\nFifty-six patients were included (18 RAPN, 38 PCA). PCA patients had a significantly higher age (68.5 years; P = 0.019) and Charlson comorbidity index (3.0; P = 0.007). Tumor characteristics did not differ significantly between RAPN and PCA. Total renal volume decreased significantly after PCA (−18.2 cm3; P = 0.001). Baseline chronic disease stage IIIb–IV leads to a greater reduction in renal volume (−31.8 cm3; P = 0.003) but not other renal function measures. Renal function declined significantly after either treatment without significant differences between RAPN and PCA.\n\n\n\nThis study found a small, similar decrease in renal function 6 months after RAPN or PCA, despite significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. Reduced renal function at baseline did not lead to a worse renal functional outcome.\n","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jcis_66_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) in clinical stage T1 (cT1) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and evaluate the relationship between baseline renal function and renal functional outcome. Patients with cT1 RCC treated with RAPN or PCA were prospectively enrolled between June 2019 and January 2021. Renal function was evaluated using estimated glomerular filtration rate, Tc-99m diethylenetriamine-pentaacetate plasma clearance, Tc-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine renography, and renal volume at baseline and 6 months after treatment. Fifty-six patients were included (18 RAPN, 38 PCA). PCA patients had a significantly higher age (68.5 years; P = 0.019) and Charlson comorbidity index (3.0; P = 0.007). Tumor characteristics did not differ significantly between RAPN and PCA. Total renal volume decreased significantly after PCA (−18.2 cm3; P = 0.001). Baseline chronic disease stage IIIb–IV leads to a greater reduction in renal volume (−31.8 cm3; P = 0.003) but not other renal function measures. Renal function declined significantly after either treatment without significant differences between RAPN and PCA. This study found a small, similar decrease in renal function 6 months after RAPN or PCA, despite significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. Reduced renal function at baseline did not lead to a worse renal functional outcome.
临床 T1 级肾细胞癌机器人辅助肾部分切除术和经皮冷冻消融术后的肾功能预后 - 一项前瞻性研究
本研究旨在调查临床T1期(cT1)肾细胞癌(RCC)患者接受机器人辅助肾部分切除术(RAPN)和经皮冷冻消融术(PCA)后的肾功能,并评估基线肾功能与肾功能预后之间的关系。2019年6月至2021年1月期间,对接受RAPN或PCA治疗的cT1 RCC患者进行了前瞻性登记。采用估算肾小球滤过率、Tc-99m二乙烯三胺五乙酸酯血浆清除率、Tc-99m巯基乙酰三甘氨酸肾造影以及基线和治疗后6个月的肾脏体积对肾功能进行评估。PCA患者的年龄(68.5岁;P=0.019)和Charlson合并症指数(3.0;P=0.007)明显高于RAPN患者。RAPN 和 PCA 患者的肿瘤特征无明显差异。PCA 后肾脏总体积明显缩小(-18.2 cm3;P = 0.001)。基线慢性病分期 IIIb-IV 会导致肾脏体积减少更多(-31.8 立方厘米;P = 0.003),但不会导致其他肾功能指标的减少。本研究发现,尽管患者的基线特征存在显著差异,但在接受 RAPN 或 PCA 治疗 6 个月后,肾功能会出现类似的小幅下降。基线肾功能下降并不会导致更差的肾功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信