The steps that young people and suicide prevention professionals think the social media industry and policymakers should take to improve online safety. A nested cross-sectional study within a Delphi consensus approach

Jo Robinson, Pinar Thorn, Samantha M. McKay, Hannah Richards, Rikki Battersby-Coulter, Michelle Lamblin, Laura Hemming, Louise La Sala
{"title":"The steps that young people and suicide prevention professionals think the social media industry and policymakers should take to improve online safety. A nested cross-sectional study within a Delphi consensus approach","authors":"Jo Robinson, Pinar Thorn, Samantha M. McKay, Hannah Richards, Rikki Battersby-Coulter, Michelle Lamblin, Laura Hemming, Louise La Sala","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2023.1274263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerns exist about the relationship between social media and youth self-harm and suicide. Study aims were to examine the extent to which young people and suicide prevention professionals agreed on: (1) the utility of actions that social media companies currently take in response to self-harm and suicide-related content; and (2) further steps that the social media industry and policymakers could take to improve online safety.This was a cross-sectional survey study nested within a larger Delphi expert consensus study. A systematic search of peer-reviewed and grey literature and roundtables with social media companies, policymakers, and young people informed the questionnaire development. Two expert panels were developed to participate in the overarching Delphi study, one of young people and one of suicide prevention experts; of them 43 young people and 23 professionals participated in the current study. The proportion of participants “strongly agreeing”, “somewhat agreeing”, “neither agreeing nor disagreeing”, and “somewhat disagreeing” or “strongly disagreeing” for each item were calculated; items that achieved =>80% of agreement from both panels were strongly endorsed.There was limited consensus across the two groups regarding the utility of the safety strategies currently employed by companies. However, both groups largely agreed that self-harm and suicide-related content should be restricted. Both groups also agreed that companies should have clear policies covering content promoting self-harm or suicide, graphic depictions of self-harm or suicide, and games, pacts and hoaxes. There was moderate agreement that companies should use artificial intelligence to send resources to users at risk. Just over half of professionals and just under half of young people agreed that social media companies should be regulated by government. There was strong support for governments to require schools to educate students on safe online communication. There was also strong support for international collaboration to better coordinate efforts.Study findings reflect the complexity associated with trying to minimise the risks of communicating online about self-harm or suicide whilst capitalising on the benefits. However, a clear message was the need for better collaboration between policymakers and the social media industry and between government and its international counterparts","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"90 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2023.1274263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns exist about the relationship between social media and youth self-harm and suicide. Study aims were to examine the extent to which young people and suicide prevention professionals agreed on: (1) the utility of actions that social media companies currently take in response to self-harm and suicide-related content; and (2) further steps that the social media industry and policymakers could take to improve online safety.This was a cross-sectional survey study nested within a larger Delphi expert consensus study. A systematic search of peer-reviewed and grey literature and roundtables with social media companies, policymakers, and young people informed the questionnaire development. Two expert panels were developed to participate in the overarching Delphi study, one of young people and one of suicide prevention experts; of them 43 young people and 23 professionals participated in the current study. The proportion of participants “strongly agreeing”, “somewhat agreeing”, “neither agreeing nor disagreeing”, and “somewhat disagreeing” or “strongly disagreeing” for each item were calculated; items that achieved =>80% of agreement from both panels were strongly endorsed.There was limited consensus across the two groups regarding the utility of the safety strategies currently employed by companies. However, both groups largely agreed that self-harm and suicide-related content should be restricted. Both groups also agreed that companies should have clear policies covering content promoting self-harm or suicide, graphic depictions of self-harm or suicide, and games, pacts and hoaxes. There was moderate agreement that companies should use artificial intelligence to send resources to users at risk. Just over half of professionals and just under half of young people agreed that social media companies should be regulated by government. There was strong support for governments to require schools to educate students on safe online communication. There was also strong support for international collaboration to better coordinate efforts.Study findings reflect the complexity associated with trying to minimise the risks of communicating online about self-harm or suicide whilst capitalising on the benefits. However, a clear message was the need for better collaboration between policymakers and the social media industry and between government and its international counterparts
年轻人和自杀预防专业人士认为社交媒体行业和政策制定者应采取哪些措施来改善网络安全。德尔菲共识法中的嵌套横断面研究
社交媒体与青少年自残和自杀之间的关系备受关注。研究目的是考察青少年和自杀预防专业人士对以下问题的认同程度:(1) 社交媒体公司目前针对自残和自杀相关内容所采取的措施的效用;(2) 社交媒体行业和政策制定者为改善在线安全可采取的进一步措施。通过对同行评议和灰色文献的系统搜索,以及与社交媒体公司、政策制定者和年轻人的圆桌会议,为问卷的编制提供了信息。我们成立了两个专家小组,分别由年轻人和自杀预防专家组成,参与德尔菲总体研究;其中 43 名年轻人和 23 名专业人士参与了本次研究。我们计算了 "非常同意"、"比较同意"、"既不同意也不不反对"、"比较不同意 "或 "非常不同意 "的参与者在每个项目中所占的比例;获得两个专家小组=>80%同意的项目即为 "非常同意"。不过,两个小组都基本同意应限制与自残和自杀相关的内容。两个小组还一致认为,公司应制定明确的政策,涵盖宣传自我伤害或自杀的内容、对自我伤害或自杀的生动描述,以及游戏、契约和骗局。对于公司应使用人工智能向处于危险中的用户发送资源,两组人的意见基本一致。略高于半数的专业人士和略低于半数的年轻人同意社交媒体公司应受政府监管。人们强烈支持政府要求学校对学生进行安全网络交流教育。研究结果反映出,在尽量减少有关自残或自杀的网络交流风险的同时,如何利用其带来的益处是一个复杂的问题。然而,一个明确的信息是,政策制定者与社交媒体行业之间以及政府与国际同行之间需要更好地合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信