ALFABETIZAÇÃO E LUDICIDADE: COMO OS PESQUISADORES RELACIONAM OS CONCEITOS

Ariane Crociari, Marcia CRISTINA ARGENTI
{"title":"ALFABETIZAÇÃO E LUDICIDADE: COMO OS PESQUISADORES RELACIONAM OS CONCEITOS","authors":"Ariane Crociari, Marcia CRISTINA ARGENTI","doi":"10.35265/2236-6717-241-12882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study addresses the theme of \"Literacy and Playfulness\" and was developed in response to the need to understand how these concepts are presented in research, since when worked together, they provide tools for the construction of effective pedagogical practices, making the teaching and learning process meaningful and respectful. Therefore, the objective is to understand the existing relationships regarding Literacy and Playfulness in research. In line with the proposed objective, a bibliographic survey was conducted using the Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings of ANPEd (National Association of Graduate Studies and Research in Education), searching for research presented in the Working Groups on Literacy, Reading, and Writing between the years 2012 and 2012. Through access to the complete articles, it was observed that there is a gap between the concepts of Literacy and Playfulness, which are predominantly presented in distinct ways, not demonstrating connections between them and emphasizing the limited interest and lack of knowledge about the potential enhancement of learning when they are addressed together. It is concluded, then, that there is a gap in research regarding the proposed topic, reinforcing the need to demonstrate relevance and understanding that the gap reflects existing deficiencies in the educational area.","PeriodicalId":21289,"journal":{"name":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-241-12882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study addresses the theme of "Literacy and Playfulness" and was developed in response to the need to understand how these concepts are presented in research, since when worked together, they provide tools for the construction of effective pedagogical practices, making the teaching and learning process meaningful and respectful. Therefore, the objective is to understand the existing relationships regarding Literacy and Playfulness in research. In line with the proposed objective, a bibliographic survey was conducted using the Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings of ANPEd (National Association of Graduate Studies and Research in Education), searching for research presented in the Working Groups on Literacy, Reading, and Writing between the years 2012 and 2012. Through access to the complete articles, it was observed that there is a gap between the concepts of Literacy and Playfulness, which are predominantly presented in distinct ways, not demonstrating connections between them and emphasizing the limited interest and lack of knowledge about the potential enhancement of learning when they are addressed together. It is concluded, then, that there is a gap in research regarding the proposed topic, reinforcing the need to demonstrate relevance and understanding that the gap reflects existing deficiencies in the educational area.
识字与游戏性:研究人员如何将这两个概念联系起来
本研究以 "识字与游戏性 "为主题,是为了满足了解这些概念在研究中的呈现方式的需 要而开展的,因为当这些概念共同作用时,它们为构建有效的教学实践提供了工具,使教 学过程变得有意义且受到尊重。因此,我们的目标是了解研究中有关 "识字 "和 "游戏性 "的现有关系。根据提出的目标,我们利用 ANPEd(全国教育研究生和研究协会)科学会议的论文集进行了书目调查,搜索了 2012 年至 2012 年期间在识字、阅读和写作工作组中提出的研究。通过查阅完整的文章,发现 "识字 "和 "游戏性 "这两个概念之间存在差距,这两个概念主要以不同的方式呈现,没有显示出它们之间的联系,并强调了人们对这两个概念结合在一起时可能提高学习效果的兴趣有限和缺乏了解。因此,得出的结论是,有关拟议主题的研究存在空白,需要加强相关性,并认识到这一空白反映了教育领域的现有缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信