A Study And Analysis Of The Plurality Of Views Among Scholars And Experts In Hadith Studies Regarding The Validity Of Dhaif Hadiths

Abd. Wahid, D. Darniati, Muhammad Amin, Agusni Yahya
{"title":"A Study And Analysis Of The Plurality Of Views Among Scholars And Experts In Hadith Studies Regarding The Validity Of Dhaif Hadiths","authors":"Abd. Wahid, D. Darniati, Muhammad Amin, Agusni Yahya","doi":"10.32505/al-bukhari.v6i2.6995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hadith for Muslims has a very important position, because it reveals various traditions that developed at the time of the Prophet Muhammad which were full of various Islamic teachings. Understanding hadith is very important because hadith is the legal basis after the Qur'an, so its validity must be ensured, it is important to study the science of hadith or the blasphemy of a hadith, especially in this case the blasphemy of dhaif hadith, because hadith is the second source of law used by Muslims in determining or deciding a law. As intellectuals, we should show progress in the field of science, especially in the field of religion so that we don't make mistakes in implementing it in life. The purpose of this study is to explain the blasphemy of dhaif hadiths among muhaddisin scholars. The research method used is library research with data collection techniques through good documentation from books, journals, articles and other sources that discuss the blasphemy of dhaif hadiths. The findings of the research show that, in general, the scholars reject it as evidence and the scholars also agree to prohibit the narration of dhaif hadiths that are maudhu' without mentioning their willingness. But if the dhaif hadith is not a maudhu hadith, then there is still a dispute about whether or not it is permissible to narrate it for hujjah","PeriodicalId":407271,"journal":{"name":"Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis","volume":"278 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v6i2.6995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hadith for Muslims has a very important position, because it reveals various traditions that developed at the time of the Prophet Muhammad which were full of various Islamic teachings. Understanding hadith is very important because hadith is the legal basis after the Qur'an, so its validity must be ensured, it is important to study the science of hadith or the blasphemy of a hadith, especially in this case the blasphemy of dhaif hadith, because hadith is the second source of law used by Muslims in determining or deciding a law. As intellectuals, we should show progress in the field of science, especially in the field of religion so that we don't make mistakes in implementing it in life. The purpose of this study is to explain the blasphemy of dhaif hadiths among muhaddisin scholars. The research method used is library research with data collection techniques through good documentation from books, journals, articles and other sources that discuss the blasphemy of dhaif hadiths. The findings of the research show that, in general, the scholars reject it as evidence and the scholars also agree to prohibit the narration of dhaif hadiths that are maudhu' without mentioning their willingness. But if the dhaif hadith is not a maudhu hadith, then there is still a dispute about whether or not it is permissible to narrate it for hujjah
研究和分析圣训学学者和专家对 "宰夫圣训 "有效性的多元观点
圣训对穆斯林来说具有非常重要的地位,因为它揭示了先知穆罕默德时代形成的各种传统,其中充满了各种伊斯兰教义。了解圣训非常重要,因为圣训是继《古兰经》之后的法律依据,所以必须确保其有效性,研究圣训学或亵渎圣训,尤其是亵渎 "达伊夫圣训 "非常重要,因为圣训是穆斯林在确定或决定法律时使用的第二个法律渊源。作为知识分子,我们应该在科学领域,尤其是宗教领域取得进步,这样我们在生活中实施科学时才不会犯错误。本研究的目的是解释穆罕默德学者对 "宰夫圣训 "的亵渎。采用的研究方法是图书馆研究法,通过从书籍、期刊、文章和其他讨论亵渎 "宰夫圣训实录 "的资料来源收集数据。研究结果表明,一般来说,学者们拒绝将其作为证据,学者们还一致同意禁止叙述不提及其意愿的 "达伊夫圣训"。但如果 "达伊夫圣训 "不是 "穆德胡圣训",那么是否允许为 "古吉拉特 "传述 "达伊夫圣训 "仍然存在争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信