More trust or more risk? User acceptance of artificial intelligence virtual assistant

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Yiwei Xiong, Yan Shi, Quanlin Pu, Na Liu
{"title":"More trust or more risk? User acceptance of artificial intelligence virtual assistant","authors":"Yiwei Xiong,&nbsp;Yan Shi,&nbsp;Quanlin Pu,&nbsp;Na Liu","doi":"10.1002/hfm.21020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) virtual assistants are rapidly growing, permeating people's daily lives and work. However, some trust and risk issues prevent the acceptance and use of AI virtual assistants by users. Thus, understanding the roles of trust and perceived risk in user acceptance of AI virtual assistants is crucial. This study develops a comprehensive research model based on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to explain user acceptance of AI virtual assistants. This model extends UTAUT by adding users' perception of trust and risk. The research model and hypotheses are validated through structural equation modeling with a sample of 926 AI virtual assistant users. Results show that gender is significantly related to behavioral intention to use, education is positively related to trust and behavioral intention to use, and usage experience is positively related to attitude toward using. UTAUT variables, including performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions, are positively related to behavioral intention to use AI virtual assistant. Trust and perceived risk respectively have positive and negative effects on attitude toward using and behavioral intention to use AI virtual assistants. Trust and perceived risk play equally important roles in explaining user acceptance of AI virtual assistants. Theoretical and practical implications of the current AI virtual assistant acceptance model and directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.21020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) virtual assistants are rapidly growing, permeating people's daily lives and work. However, some trust and risk issues prevent the acceptance and use of AI virtual assistants by users. Thus, understanding the roles of trust and perceived risk in user acceptance of AI virtual assistants is crucial. This study develops a comprehensive research model based on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to explain user acceptance of AI virtual assistants. This model extends UTAUT by adding users' perception of trust and risk. The research model and hypotheses are validated through structural equation modeling with a sample of 926 AI virtual assistant users. Results show that gender is significantly related to behavioral intention to use, education is positively related to trust and behavioral intention to use, and usage experience is positively related to attitude toward using. UTAUT variables, including performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions, are positively related to behavioral intention to use AI virtual assistant. Trust and perceived risk respectively have positive and negative effects on attitude toward using and behavioral intention to use AI virtual assistants. Trust and perceived risk play equally important roles in explaining user acceptance of AI virtual assistants. Theoretical and practical implications of the current AI virtual assistant acceptance model and directions for future research are discussed.

更多信任还是更多风险?人工智能虚拟助手的用户接受度
人工智能(AI)虚拟助手正在迅速发展,渗透到人们的日常生活和工作中。然而,一些信任和风险问题阻碍了用户接受和使用人工智能虚拟助手。因此,了解信任和感知风险在用户接受人工智能虚拟助手中的作用至关重要。本研究以技术接受和使用统一理论(UTAUT)为基础,建立了一个全面的研究模型来解释用户对人工智能虚拟助手的接受程度。该模型扩展了UTAUT,增加了用户对信任和风险的感知。研究模型和假设通过结构方程建模得到验证,样本包括 926 名人工智能虚拟助手用户。结果表明,性别与使用行为意向有明显关系,教育程度与信任和使用行为意向正相关,使用经验与使用态度正相关。UTAUT变量,包括绩效期望、努力期望、社会影响和便利条件,与使用人工智能虚拟助手的行为意向正相关。信任和感知风险分别对使用态度和使用人工智能虚拟助手的行为意向产生正向和负向影响。信任和感知风险在解释用户对人工智能虚拟助手的接受度方面发挥着同等重要的作用。本文讨论了当前人工智能虚拟助手接受模型的理论和实践意义以及未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信