Lifestyle factors associated with Presenteeism among City government office workers: a cross-sectional study

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tsubasa Otsubo, Aya Kinjo, Yuki Kuwabara, K. I. Hongja, Y. Osaki
{"title":"Lifestyle factors associated with Presenteeism among City government office workers: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Tsubasa Otsubo, Aya Kinjo, Yuki Kuwabara, K. I. Hongja, Y. Osaki","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiad012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objectives: Presenteeism is a critical issue in occupational health. This study aims to examine the association between presenteeism and subjective sleep quality, smoking status, and alcohol consumption.\n Methods: Anonymous data of 777 workers in a Japanese city were retrospectively obtained from City Government Office A. It included variables like absolute presenteeism scores (measured using the Japanese version of the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire short form), gender, age, family status, subjective sleep quality, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed with gender, age, family status, subjective sleep quality, smoking status, and alcohol consumption as the independent variables, and absolute presenteeism scores equal to or below 40 as the dependent variable. A gender-stratified binary logistic regression analysis was also performed.\n Results: The logistic regression analysis results revealed that absolute presenteeism was positively associated with poor subjective sleep quality among all respondents (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–2.44) and men (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.12–3.05) and with current drinkers among women (odds ratio, 3.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.36–8.92); it was negatively associated with age among those who were ≥50 years old (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.27–0.93) and with current drinkers among men (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.20–0.92).\n Conclusions: The factors associated with presenteeism differed between men and women office workers, suggesting that gender differences need to be considered when working toward improving workers’ productivity.","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":"58 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiad012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Presenteeism is a critical issue in occupational health. This study aims to examine the association between presenteeism and subjective sleep quality, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. Methods: Anonymous data of 777 workers in a Japanese city were retrospectively obtained from City Government Office A. It included variables like absolute presenteeism scores (measured using the Japanese version of the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire short form), gender, age, family status, subjective sleep quality, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed with gender, age, family status, subjective sleep quality, smoking status, and alcohol consumption as the independent variables, and absolute presenteeism scores equal to or below 40 as the dependent variable. A gender-stratified binary logistic regression analysis was also performed. Results: The logistic regression analysis results revealed that absolute presenteeism was positively associated with poor subjective sleep quality among all respondents (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–2.44) and men (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.12–3.05) and with current drinkers among women (odds ratio, 3.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.36–8.92); it was negatively associated with age among those who were ≥50 years old (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.27–0.93) and with current drinkers among men (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.20–0.92). Conclusions: The factors associated with presenteeism differed between men and women office workers, suggesting that gender differences need to be considered when working toward improving workers’ productivity.
与市政府办公室工作人员旷工有关的生活方式因素:一项横断面研究
目的:旷工是职业健康中的一个关键问题。本研究旨在探讨旷工与主观睡眠质量、吸烟状况和饮酒量之间的关系。研究方法数据包括绝对旷工得分(使用世界卫生组织健康与工作表现问卷简表的日文版进行测量)、性别、年龄、家庭状况、主观睡眠质量、吸烟状况和饮酒量等变量。以性别、年龄、家庭状况、主观睡眠质量、吸烟状况和饮酒量为自变量,以绝对旷工分数等于或低于 40 分为因变量,进行二元逻辑回归分析。此外,还进行了性别分层二元逻辑回归分析。结果显示逻辑回归分析结果显示,在所有受访者中,绝对旷工与主观睡眠质量差呈正相关(几率比为 1.70;95% 置信区间为 1.18-2.44),在男性受访者中,绝对旷工与主观睡眠质量差呈正相关(几率比为 1.85;95% 置信区间为 1.12-3.05),在经常饮酒者中,绝对旷工与主观睡眠质量差呈正相关(几率比为 1.70;95% 置信区间为 1.18-2.44)。在年龄≥50 岁的受访者中,睡眠质量与年龄呈负相关(几率比为 0.50;95% 置信区间为 0.27-0.93),在男性受访者中,睡眠质量与酗酒呈负相关(几率比为 0.43;95% 置信区间为 0.20-0.92)。结论与旷工相关的因素在男性和女性办公室工作人员之间存在差异,这表明在努力提高工人的工作效率时需要考虑性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信