Researching gender-based violence remotely during a pandemic: challenges, opportunities and methodological implications

IF 1.7 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Holly Taylor-Dunn, Lis Bates, Dominic Reed, Anna Hopkins, Shona Morrison
{"title":"Researching gender-based violence remotely during a pandemic: challenges, opportunities and methodological implications","authors":"Holly Taylor-Dunn, Lis Bates, Dominic Reed, Anna Hopkins, Shona Morrison","doi":"10.1332/23986808y2023d000000009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been increased awareness of the unique challenges faced by those researching gender-based violence (GBV) in recent years. While much of the literature has rightly focused on the needs of participants (as victim/survivors), less has been written around the needs of researchers. Yet we know that researching GBV can have both positive and negative impacts on researchers (Nikischer, 2019) and it has recently been recommended that researchers have access to clinical supervision when regularly exposed to traumatic material (Williamson et al, 2020). This article draws on reflections from research carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic regarding the reasons why victims of domestic abuse and/or sexual violence may withdraw from the criminal justice process. The research team were provided with independent clinical supervision by a qualified therapist with expertise in interpersonal abuse throughout the duration of the project. Analysis of the researchers’ reflections suggest that while the move to remote research during the pandemic created opportunities in terms of flexibility there were additional emotional challenges to those experienced pre-pandemic. Importantly, this exploratory article shares reflections on the value of clinical supervision for addressing these challenges and recommends that all GBV researchers have access to this vital resource.","PeriodicalId":42166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/23986808y2023d000000009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been increased awareness of the unique challenges faced by those researching gender-based violence (GBV) in recent years. While much of the literature has rightly focused on the needs of participants (as victim/survivors), less has been written around the needs of researchers. Yet we know that researching GBV can have both positive and negative impacts on researchers (Nikischer, 2019) and it has recently been recommended that researchers have access to clinical supervision when regularly exposed to traumatic material (Williamson et al, 2020). This article draws on reflections from research carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic regarding the reasons why victims of domestic abuse and/or sexual violence may withdraw from the criminal justice process. The research team were provided with independent clinical supervision by a qualified therapist with expertise in interpersonal abuse throughout the duration of the project. Analysis of the researchers’ reflections suggest that while the move to remote research during the pandemic created opportunities in terms of flexibility there were additional emotional challenges to those experienced pre-pandemic. Importantly, this exploratory article shares reflections on the value of clinical supervision for addressing these challenges and recommends that all GBV researchers have access to this vital resource.
大流行病期间远程研究基于性别的暴力:挑战、机遇和方法论影响
近年来,人们越来越意识到研究性别暴力 (GBV) 的人员所面临的独特挑战。虽然大部分文献都正确地关注了参与者(作为受害者/幸存者)的需求,但围绕研究人员需求的文献却较少。然而我们知道,研究 GBV 可能会对研究人员产生积极和消极的影响(Nikischer,2019 年),最近有人建议,研究人员在经常接触创伤性材料时应接受临床监督(Williamson et al,2020 年)。本文借鉴了在 COVID-19 大流行期间开展的研究的反思,该研究涉及家庭虐待和/或性暴力受害者退出刑事司法程序的原因。在整个项目期间,研究团队都得到了一名具有人际虐待专业知识的合格治疗师的独立临床指导。对研究人员反思的分析表明,虽然在大流行期间进行远程研究在灵活性方面创造了机会,但与大流行前所经历的情况相比,还存在额外的情感挑战。重要的是,这篇探索性文章分享了临床督导在应对这些挑战方面的价值,并建议所有性别暴力研究人员都能获得这一重要资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信