THE RESEARCH STATUS OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN SCIENCE EDUCATION

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yulian Zhang, Weijun Wang, Yi Xian, Xianfeng Wang, Jiabin Huang
{"title":"THE RESEARCH STATUS OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN SCIENCE EDUCATION","authors":"Yulian Zhang, Weijun Wang, Yi Xian, Xianfeng Wang, Jiabin Huang","doi":"10.33225/jbse/23.22.1103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the number of publications on formative assessment in science education has long been high, there is no bibliometric analysis or scientific mapping in the literature to understand research trends in formative assessment research. This research aimed to examine the bibliometric results of articles on formative assessment in science education. Based on the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, 94 articles were selected for analysis. The results show that between 2015-2016 and 2020-2022, the number of publications on formative assessment increased substantially. Among the top ten institutions that contributed to the research are three institutions from the United States. The results also show that the United States had the most publications. Analysis of the co-citations showed that the Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Science Education, and the International Journal of Science Education were cited more than 100 times. The three most cited studies were published in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice. The results show that the researcher used formative assessment, students, science education, teaching, education, engineering education, curricula, STEM, and e-learning in research on formative assessment. In light of the obtained results, practical suggestions for further studies are made in the conclusion. \nKeywords: formative assessment, science education, SCOPUS, bibliometric analysis","PeriodicalId":46424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Baltic Science Education","volume":"23 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Baltic Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.1103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the number of publications on formative assessment in science education has long been high, there is no bibliometric analysis or scientific mapping in the literature to understand research trends in formative assessment research. This research aimed to examine the bibliometric results of articles on formative assessment in science education. Based on the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, 94 articles were selected for analysis. The results show that between 2015-2016 and 2020-2022, the number of publications on formative assessment increased substantially. Among the top ten institutions that contributed to the research are three institutions from the United States. The results also show that the United States had the most publications. Analysis of the co-citations showed that the Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Science Education, and the International Journal of Science Education were cited more than 100 times. The three most cited studies were published in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice. The results show that the researcher used formative assessment, students, science education, teaching, education, engineering education, curricula, STEM, and e-learning in research on formative assessment. In light of the obtained results, practical suggestions for further studies are made in the conclusion. Keywords: formative assessment, science education, SCOPUS, bibliometric analysis
科学教育中形成性评估的研究现状
虽然有关科学教育中形成性评价的论文数量长期以来一直居高不下,但文献中并没有进行文献计量分析或科学绘图,以了解形成性评价研究的研究趋势。本研究旨在考察有关科学教育中形成性评价的文章的文献计量结果。根据纳入和排除标准,选取了 94 篇文章进行分析。结果显示,2015-2016 年至 2020-2022 年间,有关形成性评价的论文数量大幅增加。在为研究做出贡献的前十名机构中,有三家机构来自美国。结果还显示,美国发表的论文最多。对共同引用的分析表明,《科学教学研究期刊》、《科学教育》和《国际科学教育期刊》被引用了 100 多次。被引用次数最多的三项研究发表在《教育评估》上:原则、政策与实践》。结果表明,研究者在研究形成性评估时使用了形成性评估、学生、科学教育、教学、教 育、工程教育、课程、STEM 和电子学习。根据所获得的结果,在结论中为进一步研究提出了切实可行的建议。关键词:形成性评估、科学教育、SCOPUS、文献计量分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Baltic Science Education
Journal of Baltic Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信