Comparison of the use of different accesses for sacrocolpopexy in women with apical prolapse: A literature review

Kamil’ R. Bakhtiyarov, Kristina D. Evstratova, Elena V. Virivskaya, Margarita R. Zvyagintseva
{"title":"Comparison of the use of different accesses for sacrocolpopexy in women with apical prolapse: A literature review","authors":"Kamil’ R. Bakhtiyarov, Kristina D. Evstratova, Elena V. Virivskaya, Margarita R. Zvyagintseva","doi":"10.17816/2313-8726-2023-10-4-253-259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interest in the issue of genital prolapse is increasing worldwide. The prevalence varies across countries and is higher in resource-limited ones. In countries where systematic statistics are available, the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse ranges from 3 to 50%. Conservative and surgical methods for correcting this issue are extensively covered in Russian and foreign literature. Sacrocolpopexy is one of these methods, which is commonly used to correct apical prolapse. This review aimed to compare and evaluate the outcomes of abdominal, robotic, and laparoscopic accesses for performing this surgical procedure and assess the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Each surgical approach is analyzed regarding the incidence of postoperative complications, surgical duration, and satisfaction of patients with their quality of life in the postoperative period. Pelvic organ prolapse is an increasingly pressing issue, given the increase in life expectancy and its earlier detection. According to statistical projections, by 2050, 9.2 million women worldwide will have this disease.","PeriodicalId":448378,"journal":{"name":"V.F.Snegirev Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"V.F.Snegirev Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/2313-8726-2023-10-4-253-259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interest in the issue of genital prolapse is increasing worldwide. The prevalence varies across countries and is higher in resource-limited ones. In countries where systematic statistics are available, the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse ranges from 3 to 50%. Conservative and surgical methods for correcting this issue are extensively covered in Russian and foreign literature. Sacrocolpopexy is one of these methods, which is commonly used to correct apical prolapse. This review aimed to compare and evaluate the outcomes of abdominal, robotic, and laparoscopic accesses for performing this surgical procedure and assess the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Each surgical approach is analyzed regarding the incidence of postoperative complications, surgical duration, and satisfaction of patients with their quality of life in the postoperative period. Pelvic organ prolapse is an increasingly pressing issue, given the increase in life expectancy and its earlier detection. According to statistical projections, by 2050, 9.2 million women worldwide will have this disease.
骶尾部脱垂妇女使用不同入路进行骶尾部整形术的比较:文献综述
全世界对生殖器脱垂问题的关注与日俱增。各国的发病率不尽相同,资源有限的国家发病率更高。在有系统统计数据的国家,盆腔器官脱垂的发病率为 3%至 50%。俄罗斯和国外的文献中广泛介绍了纠正这一问题的保守和手术方法。骶尾部结肠切除术是其中一种常用于矫正顶端脱垂的方法。本综述旨在比较和评估腹腔镜、机器人和腹腔镜入路进行该手术的结果,并评估每种方法的优缺点。对每种手术方法的术后并发症发生率、手术时间以及患者对术后生活质量的满意度进行了分析。随着预期寿命的延长和早期发现,盆腔器官脱垂已成为一个日益紧迫的问题。根据统计预测,到 2050 年,全球将有 920 万妇女患有这种疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信