The Battle of Smolensk in 1941 in Soviet and Modern Historiography

Kirill Andreev
{"title":"The Battle of Smolensk in 1941 in Soviet and Modern Historiography","authors":"Kirill Andreev","doi":"10.35785/2072-9464-2023-63-3-145-161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the state of historiography of the Battle of Smolensk in \n1941. Although this issue has already been studied in Soviet historiography, a number of new studies have been published over the past two decades, and the active use \nof previously closed archival documents, both Soviet and German, has begun. Photographic materials have become an important source of studying the battle. The author paid special attention to the analysis of the works of recent years. It was revealed \nthat in modern historiography several approaches to the assessment of the Battle of Smolensk have been portrayed. This is an exaggeration of the successes of the German troops, and, consequently, emphasizing the shortcomings and blunders of the \nSoviet command, and even distorting individual episodes of events. This is especially true for works of a popular nature, and especially affecting the younger generation. At the same time, there were works whose authors strive to maintain objectivity while assessing events. A special issue in modern historiography is the question of the price that the Soviet people paid in order at least to suspend the offensive of German troops in the most important – Moscow strategic direction.","PeriodicalId":211127,"journal":{"name":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35785/2072-9464-2023-63-3-145-161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the state of historiography of the Battle of Smolensk in 1941. Although this issue has already been studied in Soviet historiography, a number of new studies have been published over the past two decades, and the active use of previously closed archival documents, both Soviet and German, has begun. Photographic materials have become an important source of studying the battle. The author paid special attention to the analysis of the works of recent years. It was revealed that in modern historiography several approaches to the assessment of the Battle of Smolensk have been portrayed. This is an exaggeration of the successes of the German troops, and, consequently, emphasizing the shortcomings and blunders of the Soviet command, and even distorting individual episodes of events. This is especially true for works of a popular nature, and especially affecting the younger generation. At the same time, there were works whose authors strive to maintain objectivity while assessing events. A special issue in modern historiography is the question of the price that the Soviet people paid in order at least to suspend the offensive of German troops in the most important – Moscow strategic direction.
苏联和现代史学中的 1941 年斯摩棱斯克战役
文章分析了 1941 年斯摩棱斯克战役的史学现状。尽管苏联史学界已经对这一问题进行了研究,但在过去二十年中,又有一些新的研究报告出版,而且开始积极利用以前封闭的档案文件,包括苏联和德国的档案文件。图片资料已成为研究该战役的重要来源。作者特别关注对近年来作品的分析。结果发现,现代史学界对斯摩棱斯克战役的评价有几种方法。这就是夸大德军的战果,进而强调苏军指挥部的缺点和失误,甚至歪曲事件的个别情节。这种情况在通俗作品中尤为突出,尤其影响到年轻一代。同时,也有一些作品的作者在评价事件时力求保持客观性。现代史学中的一个特殊问题是苏联人民为至少中止德军在最重要的莫斯科战略方向的进攻所付出的代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信