How do Alexandrians and Najdis Apologize? A Variational Pragmatic Study of Arabic

Q1 Social Sciences
Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs, Mervat M. Ahmed, Jawaher Nasser AlHaqbani, Afrah Alenezi
{"title":"How do Alexandrians and Najdis Apologize? A Variational Pragmatic Study of Arabic","authors":"Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs, Mervat M. Ahmed, Jawaher Nasser AlHaqbani, Afrah Alenezi","doi":"10.29333/ejecs/1737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a paucity of variational pragmatic research that compares the realization of the speech act of apology across dialects of one and the same language. The current study aimed at comparing the realization of the speech act of apology between two Arabic dialects, namely Alexandrian Arabic in Egypt and Najdi Arabic in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from 120 participants using role-play. The participants were undergraduate students, equally divided into males and females. Half the participants were Najdis, while the other half were Alexandrians. The apology strategies were coded using Olshtain and Cohen’s (1983) model. Additionally, initiators and internal/external modifications were analyzed. The results showed that the two groups of participants adopted a similar apology behavior, a finding which was explained in terms of the unifying influence of religion. The results also showed a strong influence for social dominance on the participants’ apology behavior. This influence was larger than the moderate influence for social distance and the limited influence for gender. Based on the findings, we recommend conducting further variational pragmatic research on the Arabic language.","PeriodicalId":37174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies","volume":" 801","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a paucity of variational pragmatic research that compares the realization of the speech act of apology across dialects of one and the same language. The current study aimed at comparing the realization of the speech act of apology between two Arabic dialects, namely Alexandrian Arabic in Egypt and Najdi Arabic in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from 120 participants using role-play. The participants were undergraduate students, equally divided into males and females. Half the participants were Najdis, while the other half were Alexandrians. The apology strategies were coded using Olshtain and Cohen’s (1983) model. Additionally, initiators and internal/external modifications were analyzed. The results showed that the two groups of participants adopted a similar apology behavior, a finding which was explained in terms of the unifying influence of religion. The results also showed a strong influence for social dominance on the participants’ apology behavior. This influence was larger than the moderate influence for social distance and the limited influence for gender. Based on the findings, we recommend conducting further variational pragmatic research on the Arabic language.
亚历山大人和纳杰迪人如何道歉?阿拉伯语变异语法研究
很少有变体语用学研究比较同一种语言的不同方言之间道歉言语行为的实现情况。本研究旨在比较两种阿拉伯语方言(即埃及亚历山大阿拉伯语和沙特阿拉伯纳杰迪阿拉伯语)之间道歉言语行为的实现情况。研究采用角色扮演的方式收集了 120 名参与者的数据。参与者为本科生,男女各半。一半参与者是纳杰迪人,另一半是亚历山大人。道歉策略采用奥尔施坦(Olshtain)和科恩(Cohen,1983 年)的模型进行编码。此外,还对发起者和内部/外部修改进行了分析。结果表明,两组参与者采取了相似的道歉行为,这一结果可以用宗教的统一影响来解释。结果还显示,社会主导地位对参与者的道歉行为有很大影响。这种影响大于社会距离的中等影响和性别的有限影响。根据研究结果,我们建议对阿拉伯语进行进一步的变式语用研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信