Historical archives reveal record rainfall and severe flooding in December 1867 resulting from an atmospheric river and snowmelt, western Washington, USA

Daniel G. Gavin, P. Bartlein, Cary J. Mock
{"title":"Historical archives reveal record rainfall and severe flooding in December 1867 resulting from an atmospheric river and snowmelt, western Washington, USA","authors":"Daniel G. Gavin, P. Bartlein, Cary J. Mock","doi":"10.1371/journal.pclm.0000324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The flooding of 1861-1862 in California and Oregon is the most severe flood event documented in the far western USA and stands as a benchmark for a worst-case atmospheric-river flooding event. In western Washington, historical data are sparser, and 19th-century flood events have consequently not been well documented. We found that rainfall observations from five locations spanning western Washington had no detectable bias when compared to nearby 20th and 21st-century comparator stations. Time series of the four-day precipitation sum revealed an event in December 1867 that was greater than any of the last century at three locations, and in the top two events at the other two locations. Summing over all locations, the regional three-day or four-day peak precipitation in 1867 exceeded the 150-yr recurrence magnitude by nearly 150 mm, indicative of non-stationarity of precipitation extremes. Newspapers and historical accounts document flood damage to settlements, farms, and bridges from the Columbia River to central Puget Sound. Reported high water levels at two locations indicate floodplains under more than a meter of water. Reanalysis data (20CRv3) is poorly spatially constrained in 1867, and underestimates the magnitude of this event, but it clearly shows the atmospheric-river cause of the event and supports snowmelt as a significant contributor to flooding. Compared to the most recent extensive flooding in 1996, the 1867 floods were likely of a similar extent but centered further north, and with notably more precipitation and enhanced by snowmelt. The 1867 rainfall amounts were also greater than those produced by the 2006 atmospheric river, though flooding in 2006 was not enhanced by snowmelt and record stream discharges were limited to mountain catchments. The combined rainfall and flood evidence from 1867 shows the potential for events more extreme than have occurred in recent history in the major urban corridors of western Washington.","PeriodicalId":74463,"journal":{"name":"PLOS climate","volume":"3 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The flooding of 1861-1862 in California and Oregon is the most severe flood event documented in the far western USA and stands as a benchmark for a worst-case atmospheric-river flooding event. In western Washington, historical data are sparser, and 19th-century flood events have consequently not been well documented. We found that rainfall observations from five locations spanning western Washington had no detectable bias when compared to nearby 20th and 21st-century comparator stations. Time series of the four-day precipitation sum revealed an event in December 1867 that was greater than any of the last century at three locations, and in the top two events at the other two locations. Summing over all locations, the regional three-day or four-day peak precipitation in 1867 exceeded the 150-yr recurrence magnitude by nearly 150 mm, indicative of non-stationarity of precipitation extremes. Newspapers and historical accounts document flood damage to settlements, farms, and bridges from the Columbia River to central Puget Sound. Reported high water levels at two locations indicate floodplains under more than a meter of water. Reanalysis data (20CRv3) is poorly spatially constrained in 1867, and underestimates the magnitude of this event, but it clearly shows the atmospheric-river cause of the event and supports snowmelt as a significant contributor to flooding. Compared to the most recent extensive flooding in 1996, the 1867 floods were likely of a similar extent but centered further north, and with notably more precipitation and enhanced by snowmelt. The 1867 rainfall amounts were also greater than those produced by the 2006 atmospheric river, though flooding in 2006 was not enhanced by snowmelt and record stream discharges were limited to mountain catchments. The combined rainfall and flood evidence from 1867 shows the potential for events more extreme than have occurred in recent history in the major urban corridors of western Washington.
历史档案显示,1867 年 12 月,美国华盛顿州西部因大气河流和融雪造成了创纪录的降雨和严重洪灾
加利福尼亚州和俄勒冈州 1861-1862 年的洪水是美国最西部有记载的最严重的洪水事件,也是最坏情况下大气-河流洪水事件的基准。华盛顿州西部的历史数据较少,因此 19 世纪的洪水事件没有得到很好的记录。我们发现,与附近的 20 世纪和 21 世纪参照站相比,华盛顿州西部五个地点的降水观测数据没有可检测到的偏差。四天降水量总和的时间序列显示,1867 年 12 月有三个地点的降水量超过了上个世纪的任何一次降水量,另外两个地点的降水量则排在前两位。将所有地点的降水量相加,1867 年该地区三天或四天的峰值降水量比 150 年的重现幅度高出近 150 毫米,这表明极端降水量并不稳定。报纸和历史记录记载了从哥伦比亚河到普吉特海湾中部的居民点、农场和桥梁遭受的洪水破坏。两个地点的高水位报告显示,洪泛区的水位超过一米。1867 年的再分析数据(20CRv3)空间约束较差,低估了这次洪水的规模,但它清楚地显示了大气-河流作用的洪水成因,并支持融雪是洪水的重要成因。与最近的 1996 年大洪水相比,1867 年洪水的规模可能相似,但洪水的中心更靠北,降水量明显更大,融雪作用也更强。1867 年的降雨量也大于 2006 年的大气河流,尽管 2006 年的洪水并没有因融雪而增强,创纪录的河流排水量也仅限于山区集水区。1867 年的降雨和洪水综合证据表明,华盛顿州西部主要城市走廊可能会发生比近代历史上更极端的事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信