A Research Study on Comparison of Prevalence and Outcome of Maxillofacial Odontogenic Space Infection between Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients

Shahid Ali, Wares Uddin, Gupta Siddharth, Rajesh Sah
{"title":"A Research Study on Comparison of Prevalence and Outcome of Maxillofacial Odontogenic Space Infection between Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients","authors":"Shahid Ali, Wares Uddin, Gupta Siddharth, Rajesh Sah","doi":"10.30958/ajhms.10-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Orofacial space infections are commonly encountered problems in dental practice. The highest prevalence is seen among South Asian population because of their negligence in seeking dental treatment. Diabetes is one of the most common systemic illnesses suppressing the immunity of individual and increasing their susceptibility to infections. Currently, immunocompromised situation (Diabetes mellitus) and space infection together leads to complexity to evaluate the overall outcome of the patients. Objective: Aim of this study is to compare the prevalence and outcome of maxillofacial odontogenic space infection between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, BSMMU and DMCH over a period of 15 Months, from June 2020 to August 2021.The selection of the patients was as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study commenced after IRB clearance. All the patients enrolled in this study after proper counseling and informed written consent. A total of 63 patients were taken and divided in to two groups on the basis of presence or absence of diabetes mellitus, Group A (diabetic): N1 number of patients and Group B (non-diabetic): N2 number of patients. Results: Majority of the patients were from BSMMU (58.73%) followed by DMCH (41.26%). Male were more commonly affected than females. Submandibular space was most commonly involved. Streptococcus was the most commonly isolated organism in non-diabetics while Klebsiella in diabetic patients. Meropenem was the most sensitive antibiotic while Amoxicillin was least sensitive antibiotic against the organisms found. This data will be helpful for future research and that will be considered baseline information for public health department. Conclusion: Prevalence of MSI was 4.33 (per thousand) in the study centers of Dhaka. Submandibular space was most common involved space in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Streptococcus was the most commonly isolated organism in non-diabetics while Klebsiellain diabetic patients. Meropenam was the most sensitive antibiotic in both group while Amoxicillin was not found sensitive on any patient in group A while least sensitive in group B. Keywords: odontogenic infection, fascial spaces, culture and antibiotic sensitivity","PeriodicalId":196877,"journal":{"name":"Athens Journal of Health and Medical Sciences","volume":"1 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athens Journal of Health and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajhms.10-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orofacial space infections are commonly encountered problems in dental practice. The highest prevalence is seen among South Asian population because of their negligence in seeking dental treatment. Diabetes is one of the most common systemic illnesses suppressing the immunity of individual and increasing their susceptibility to infections. Currently, immunocompromised situation (Diabetes mellitus) and space infection together leads to complexity to evaluate the overall outcome of the patients. Objective: Aim of this study is to compare the prevalence and outcome of maxillofacial odontogenic space infection between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, BSMMU and DMCH over a period of 15 Months, from June 2020 to August 2021.The selection of the patients was as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study commenced after IRB clearance. All the patients enrolled in this study after proper counseling and informed written consent. A total of 63 patients were taken and divided in to two groups on the basis of presence or absence of diabetes mellitus, Group A (diabetic): N1 number of patients and Group B (non-diabetic): N2 number of patients. Results: Majority of the patients were from BSMMU (58.73%) followed by DMCH (41.26%). Male were more commonly affected than females. Submandibular space was most commonly involved. Streptococcus was the most commonly isolated organism in non-diabetics while Klebsiella in diabetic patients. Meropenem was the most sensitive antibiotic while Amoxicillin was least sensitive antibiotic against the organisms found. This data will be helpful for future research and that will be considered baseline information for public health department. Conclusion: Prevalence of MSI was 4.33 (per thousand) in the study centers of Dhaka. Submandibular space was most common involved space in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Streptococcus was the most commonly isolated organism in non-diabetics while Klebsiellain diabetic patients. Meropenam was the most sensitive antibiotic in both group while Amoxicillin was not found sensitive on any patient in group A while least sensitive in group B. Keywords: odontogenic infection, fascial spaces, culture and antibiotic sensitivity
糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者颌面部牙源性间隙感染的患病率和结果比较研究
背景:口腔颌面部感染是牙科临床中经常遇到的问题。南亚人的发病率最高,因为他们疏于牙科治疗。糖尿病是最常见的全身性疾病之一,会抑制人的免疫力,增加他们对感染的易感性。目前,免疫力低下的情况(糖尿病)和空间感染共同导致了评估患者整体疗效的复杂性。研究目的本研究旨在比较糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者颌面部牙源性间隙感染的发病率和结果。材料和方法:这项横断面研究于 2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 8 月在 BSMMU 和 DMCH 的口腔颌面外科进行,为期 15 个月。本研究在获得国际注册研究委员会(IRB)批准后开始。所有患者都在经过适当的咨询和知情书面同意后加入了这项研究。共抽取了 63 名患者,并根据是否患有糖尿病将其分为两组:A 组(糖尿病),患者人数为 N1;B 组(糖尿病),患者人数为 N2:A 组(糖尿病患者):N1 人;B 组(非糖尿病患者):N2 人:N2 组。结果大多数患者来自 BSMMU(58.73%),其次是 DMCH(41.26%)。男性患者多于女性患者。颌下间隙最常受累。在非糖尿病患者中,链球菌是最常见的分离菌,而在糖尿病患者中,克雷伯菌是最常见的分离菌。美罗培南是对所发现病菌最敏感的抗生素,而阿莫西林是对所发现病菌最不敏感的抗生素。这些数据将有助于今后的研究,并将被视为公共卫生部门的基准信息。结论达卡研究中心的 MSI 患病率为 4.33(每千人)。颌下间隙是糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者最常受累的间隙。在非糖尿病患者中,链球菌是最常见的分离菌,而在糖尿病患者中,克雷伯菌是最常见的分离菌。美罗培南是两组患者中最敏感的抗生素,而阿莫西林在A组患者中均不敏感,在B组患者中敏感性最低。 关键词:牙源性感染、筋膜间隙、培养和抗生素敏感性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信