Several sentences on canonical-legal foundations of monastery creation in premongolian Russia

P. Gaidenko
{"title":"Several sentences on canonical-legal foundations of monastery creation in premongolian Russia","authors":"P. Gaidenko","doi":"10.24888/2410-4205-2023-37-4-55-73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. This study focuses on the formation of ancient Russian monasticism in the 11th-13th centuries. The main emphasis of the article is on the recognition of foreign communities as fullyfledged monasteries by episcopal cathedrals, as well as on the administrative-canonical rights of ancient Russian bishops. The author is interested in how the relationship between the episcopate and monasteries developed and changed. Methods. The analysis of the information on the establishment of the first Russian monasteries allows for some preliminary judgments not only in the field of the history of relations between the episcopate and monastic communities, but also regarding the development of canonical concepts within the church organization, revealing the peculiarities of these processes in different lands. Materials and methods. The main sources for this work were published and well-known sources on the early history of the Russian Church: ancient Russian chronicles, a collection of texts related to the history of the Kiev-Pechersk Monastery, 25 graffiti, as well as sources on the early history of the Antonius Romanin Monastery. Results. As a result, the author comes to the following conclusions. Firstly, the process of recognizing monastic settlements and institutions by episcopal cathedrals was complex and reflected the extremely difficult canonical and administrative situation in Russia. If in the initial stage, in the first century after the events of the Baptism, there was maximum freedom, expressed in the fact that the majority of monastic settlements were founded solely at the desire of the monks or at the will of the princes, then over time there is a tendency to expand the rights of the hierarchs in the control of monastic life. Conclusion. The first successful experience of full influence of the hierarchs on monastic life for the cathedrals is observed in the time of Prince Vsevolod and Metropolitan John the Baptist. However, the participation of bishops in the foundation of monasteries and the consecration of monastery churches became the norm only from the end of the 12th century. An exception to this series was Novgorod, where monastic life was brought under the control of the bishops already in the early 12th century. Secondly, it is obvious that in the initial stage of the Christianization of Russia, most monasteries were established without recognition from the episcopate. They simply did not need it. The only authority to which such settlements resorted was the princely authority.","PeriodicalId":128487,"journal":{"name":"History: facts and symbols","volume":"102 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History: facts and symbols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24888/2410-4205-2023-37-4-55-73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. This study focuses on the formation of ancient Russian monasticism in the 11th-13th centuries. The main emphasis of the article is on the recognition of foreign communities as fullyfledged monasteries by episcopal cathedrals, as well as on the administrative-canonical rights of ancient Russian bishops. The author is interested in how the relationship between the episcopate and monasteries developed and changed. Methods. The analysis of the information on the establishment of the first Russian monasteries allows for some preliminary judgments not only in the field of the history of relations between the episcopate and monastic communities, but also regarding the development of canonical concepts within the church organization, revealing the peculiarities of these processes in different lands. Materials and methods. The main sources for this work were published and well-known sources on the early history of the Russian Church: ancient Russian chronicles, a collection of texts related to the history of the Kiev-Pechersk Monastery, 25 graffiti, as well as sources on the early history of the Antonius Romanin Monastery. Results. As a result, the author comes to the following conclusions. Firstly, the process of recognizing monastic settlements and institutions by episcopal cathedrals was complex and reflected the extremely difficult canonical and administrative situation in Russia. If in the initial stage, in the first century after the events of the Baptism, there was maximum freedom, expressed in the fact that the majority of monastic settlements were founded solely at the desire of the monks or at the will of the princes, then over time there is a tendency to expand the rights of the hierarchs in the control of monastic life. Conclusion. The first successful experience of full influence of the hierarchs on monastic life for the cathedrals is observed in the time of Prince Vsevolod and Metropolitan John the Baptist. However, the participation of bishops in the foundation of monasteries and the consecration of monastery churches became the norm only from the end of the 12th century. An exception to this series was Novgorod, where monastic life was brought under the control of the bishops already in the early 12th century. Secondly, it is obvious that in the initial stage of the Christianization of Russia, most monasteries were established without recognition from the episcopate. They simply did not need it. The only authority to which such settlements resorted was the princely authority.
关于前蒙古时期俄罗斯创建修道院的教规法律基础的几句话
简介本研究侧重于 11-13 世纪古代俄罗斯修道院的形成。文章的主要重点是主教座堂承认外国团体为正式修道院,以及古代俄罗斯主教的行政教权。作者感兴趣的是主教团与修道院之间的关系是如何发展和变化的。研究方法通过分析有关俄罗斯第一批修道院建立的信息,不仅可以在主教团与修道院团体之间的关系史领域做出一些初步判断,还可以对教会组织内部教规概念的发展做出初步判断,揭示这些过程在不同地区的特殊性。材料和方法。这项工作的主要资料来源是有关俄罗斯教会早期历史的已出版的著名资料:古代俄罗斯编年史、与基辅-佩切尔斯克修道院历史有关的文本集、25 幅涂鸦以及有关安东尼-罗曼宁修道院早期历史的资料。结果。结果,作者得出以下结论。首先,主教座堂承认修道院定居点和机构的过程是复杂的,反映了俄罗斯极其困难的教规和行政状况。如果说在最初阶段,即洗礼事件发生后的第一个世纪,存在着最大限度的自由,表现为大多数修道院完全按照僧侣的愿望或王公的意愿建立,那么随着时间的推移,出现了扩大主教在控制修道院生活方面的权利的趋势。结论。在弗塞沃洛德王子和施洗约翰都主教时期,我们首次看到了主教对大教堂修道院生活施加全面影响的成功经验。然而,从 12 世纪末开始,主教参与修道院的创建和修道院教堂的祝圣才成为常规。诺夫哥罗德是个例外,那里的修道院生活早在 12 世纪初就由主教控制了。其次,显而易见的是,在俄罗斯基督教化的最初阶段,大多数修道院的建立都没有得到主教团的承认。它们根本不需要主教的承认。这些定居点唯一求助的权威是王权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信