Ground level utility of Access, Watch, Reserve classification: Insights from a tertiary care center in North India

Gunjita Negi, Arjun Kb, Prasan Kumar Panda
{"title":"Ground level utility of Access, Watch, Reserve classification: Insights from a tertiary care center in North India","authors":"Gunjita Negi, Arjun Kb, Prasan Kumar Panda","doi":"10.5493/wjem.v13.i5.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n The overuse and misuse of antimicrobials contribute significantly to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which is a global public health concern. India has particularly high rates of AMR, posing a threat to effective treatment. The World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification system was introduced to address this issue and guide appropriate antibiotic prescribing. However, there is a lack of studies examining the prescribing patterns of antimicrobials using the AWaRe classification, especially in North India. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prescribing patterns of antimicrobials using the WHO AWaRe classification in a tertiary care centre in North India.\n AIM\n To study the prescribing patterns of antimicrobials using WHO AWaRe classification through a cross-sectional study in All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh.\n METHODS\n A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2022 to August 2022 at a tertiary care hospital. Prescriptions containing at least one antimicrobial were included in the study. Data on prescriptions, including patient demographics, departments, types of antimicrobials prescribed, and duration of treatment, were collected. A questionnaire-based survey was also conducted to assess the knowledge and practices of prescribing doctors regarding the utility of AWaRe classification.\n RESULTS\n The study involved a total of 123 patients, each of whom received at least one antimicrobial prescription. Most prescriptions were for inpatients, evenly distributed between Medicine (Internal medicine, Pediatrics, Dermatology) and Surgical departments (General surgery and specialties, Otorhinolaryngology, Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynecology). Metronidazole and ceftriaxone were the most prescribed antibiotics. According to the AWaRe classification, 57.61% of antibiotics fell under the Access category, 38.27% in Watch, and 4.11% in Reserve. Most Access antibiotics were prescribed within the Medicine department, and the same department also exhibited a higher frequency of Watch antibiotics prescriptions. The questionnaire survey showed that only a third of participants were aware of the AWaRe classification, and there was a lack of knowledge regarding AMR and the potential impact of AWaRe usage.\n CONCLUSION\n This study highlights the need for better antimicrobial prescribing practices and increased awareness of the WHO AWaRe classification and AMR among healthcare professionals. The findings indicate a high proportion of prescriptions falling under the Access category, suggesting appropriate antibiotic selection. However, there is a significant difference between the WHO Defined Daily Dose and the prescribed daily dose in the analysed prescriptions suggesting overuse and underuse of antibiotics. There is room for improvement and educational interventions and antimicrobial stewardship programs should be implemented to enhance knowledge and adherence to guidelines, ultimately contributing to the containment of AMR.","PeriodicalId":75340,"journal":{"name":"World journal of experimental medicine","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v13.i5.123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The overuse and misuse of antimicrobials contribute significantly to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which is a global public health concern. India has particularly high rates of AMR, posing a threat to effective treatment. The World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification system was introduced to address this issue and guide appropriate antibiotic prescribing. However, there is a lack of studies examining the prescribing patterns of antimicrobials using the AWaRe classification, especially in North India. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prescribing patterns of antimicrobials using the WHO AWaRe classification in a tertiary care centre in North India. AIM To study the prescribing patterns of antimicrobials using WHO AWaRe classification through a cross-sectional study in All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh. METHODS A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2022 to August 2022 at a tertiary care hospital. Prescriptions containing at least one antimicrobial were included in the study. Data on prescriptions, including patient demographics, departments, types of antimicrobials prescribed, and duration of treatment, were collected. A questionnaire-based survey was also conducted to assess the knowledge and practices of prescribing doctors regarding the utility of AWaRe classification. RESULTS The study involved a total of 123 patients, each of whom received at least one antimicrobial prescription. Most prescriptions were for inpatients, evenly distributed between Medicine (Internal medicine, Pediatrics, Dermatology) and Surgical departments (General surgery and specialties, Otorhinolaryngology, Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynecology). Metronidazole and ceftriaxone were the most prescribed antibiotics. According to the AWaRe classification, 57.61% of antibiotics fell under the Access category, 38.27% in Watch, and 4.11% in Reserve. Most Access antibiotics were prescribed within the Medicine department, and the same department also exhibited a higher frequency of Watch antibiotics prescriptions. The questionnaire survey showed that only a third of participants were aware of the AWaRe classification, and there was a lack of knowledge regarding AMR and the potential impact of AWaRe usage. CONCLUSION This study highlights the need for better antimicrobial prescribing practices and increased awareness of the WHO AWaRe classification and AMR among healthcare professionals. The findings indicate a high proportion of prescriptions falling under the Access category, suggesting appropriate antibiotic selection. However, there is a significant difference between the WHO Defined Daily Dose and the prescribed daily dose in the analysed prescriptions suggesting overuse and underuse of antibiotics. There is room for improvement and educational interventions and antimicrobial stewardship programs should be implemented to enhance knowledge and adherence to guidelines, ultimately contributing to the containment of AMR.
就诊、观察、后备分类在基层的实用性:北印度一家三级医疗中心的启示
背景抗菌药物的过度使用和滥用在很大程度上导致了抗菌药物耐药性(AMR),这是一个全球公共卫生问题。印度的抗药性发生率特别高,对有效治疗构成威胁。世界卫生组织(WHO)推出了 "获取、观察、储备"(AWaRe)分类系统,以解决这一问题并指导适当的抗生素处方。然而,目前还缺乏使用 AWaRe 分类法对抗菌药物处方模式进行研究,尤其是在北印度。因此,本研究旨在评估北印度一家三级医疗中心使用世界卫生组织 AWaRe 分类法开具抗菌药处方的模式。目的 通过一项横断面研究,研究全印度医学科学院里什凯什分院使用 WHO AWaRe 分类法开具抗菌药处方的模式。方法 2022 年 7 月至 2022 年 8 月在一家三级护理医院进行了一项描述性横断面研究。研究对象包括至少含有一种抗菌药物的处方。研究收集了处方数据,包括患者人口统计学特征、科室、处方抗菌药物类型和治疗持续时间。此外,还进行了一项问卷调查,以评估开处方的医生对 AWaRe 分类的实用性的认识和做法。结果 研究共涉及 123 名患者,每名患者至少收到一份抗菌药处方。大部分处方是针对住院病人的,平均分布在内科(内科、儿科、皮肤科)和外科(普通外科和专科、耳鼻喉科、眼科、妇产科)。甲硝唑和头孢曲松是处方量最大的抗生素。根据 AWaRe 的分类,57.61% 的抗生素属于使用类,38.27% 属于观察类,4.11% 属于储备类。大多数常用抗生素都是在内科处方的,而同一科室的观察抗生素处方频率也较高。问卷调查显示,只有三分之一的参与者知道 AWaRe 的分类,而且对 AMR 和 AWaRe 使用的潜在影响缺乏了解。结论 本研究强调,需要改进抗菌药物处方做法,提高医护人员对世界卫生组织 AWaRe 分类和 AMR 的认识。研究结果表明,属于 "可及 "类别的处方比例较高,这表明抗生素选择得当。然而,在分析的处方中,世界卫生组织定义的每日剂量与处方中的每日剂量之间存在明显差异,这表明抗生素存在过度使用和使用不足的情况。我们仍有改进的余地,应实施教育干预措施和抗菌药物管理计划,以加强对指南的了解和遵守,最终有助于遏制 AMR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信