Parents’ satisfaction and children's acceptance of nasal compared to oral midazolam for sedation in two consecutive pediatric dental treatments: a randomized controlled study

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Avia Fux-Noy, Qamar Saadi, A. Shmueli, E. Halperson, Diana Ram, M. Moskovitz
{"title":"Parents’ satisfaction and children's acceptance of nasal compared to oral midazolam for sedation in two consecutive pediatric dental treatments: a randomized controlled study","authors":"Avia Fux-Noy, Qamar Saadi, A. Shmueli, E. Halperson, Diana Ram, M. Moskovitz","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2023.1296823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Midazolam, by either the oral or the nasal route, is safe and effective in reducing anxiety and improving behavior in children during dental procedures. Aim: to compare both children's acceptance and parents’ satisfaction with midazolam premedication, when administered as an oral syrup or as a nasal spray and explore whether there were positive or negative changes in acceptance during consecutive dental treatment visits.Randomized controlled study among uncooperative 2–6-year-old children who needed at least two similar dental treatments. On each visit, the acceptability of the medication was assessed as good, fair, or poor. The duration of crying after medication administration was recorded. Additionally, parents were asked to rank their satisfaction with the mode of administration.The study group included 60 children; 30 patients received midazolam orally and 30 nasally. Route of administration did not correlate with medication acceptance in the first (p = 0.11) and second visit (p = 0.61). However, in the oral group, medication acceptance of 73% of children deteriorated on the second visit, compared to 33% in the nasal group (p = 0.01). Parents of children in the oral group expressed less satisfaction with premedication administered on the second visit than did parents of children in the nasal group, p = 0.00. Poor medication acceptance at the first visit (p = 0.014) and oral route of administration (p = 0.014) were found to be predictors of poor medication acceptance at the second visit.Acceptance of premedication is expected to deteriorate after the first treatment visit, especially in the oral route of administration. Dentists should consider nasal spray administration for young pediatric patients who need more than one dental treatment. Parents should be prepared for possible resistance or refusal by children.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02679781.","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2023.1296823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Midazolam, by either the oral or the nasal route, is safe and effective in reducing anxiety and improving behavior in children during dental procedures. Aim: to compare both children's acceptance and parents’ satisfaction with midazolam premedication, when administered as an oral syrup or as a nasal spray and explore whether there were positive or negative changes in acceptance during consecutive dental treatment visits.Randomized controlled study among uncooperative 2–6-year-old children who needed at least two similar dental treatments. On each visit, the acceptability of the medication was assessed as good, fair, or poor. The duration of crying after medication administration was recorded. Additionally, parents were asked to rank their satisfaction with the mode of administration.The study group included 60 children; 30 patients received midazolam orally and 30 nasally. Route of administration did not correlate with medication acceptance in the first (p = 0.11) and second visit (p = 0.61). However, in the oral group, medication acceptance of 73% of children deteriorated on the second visit, compared to 33% in the nasal group (p = 0.01). Parents of children in the oral group expressed less satisfaction with premedication administered on the second visit than did parents of children in the nasal group, p = 0.00. Poor medication acceptance at the first visit (p = 0.014) and oral route of administration (p = 0.014) were found to be predictors of poor medication acceptance at the second visit.Acceptance of premedication is expected to deteriorate after the first treatment visit, especially in the oral route of administration. Dentists should consider nasal spray administration for young pediatric patients who need more than one dental treatment. Parents should be prepared for possible resistance or refusal by children.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02679781.
在连续两次儿童牙科治疗中,鼻腔镇静与口服咪达唑仑相比,家长的满意度和儿童的接受度如何:随机对照研究
通过口服或鼻腔途径服用咪达唑仑可安全有效地减轻儿童在牙科治疗过程中的焦虑并改善其行为。目的:比较儿童对咪达唑仑口服糖浆或鼻腔喷雾剂预处理的接受度和家长的满意度,并探讨在连续的牙科治疗就诊过程中接受度是否会发生积极或消极的变化。每次就诊时,药物的可接受性被评估为好、一般或较差。用药后哭闹的持续时间也被记录下来。研究组包括 60 名儿童,其中 30 名儿童口服咪达唑仑,30 名儿童鼻饲咪达唑仑。首次就诊(P = 0.11)和第二次就诊(P = 0.61)时,给药方式与药物接受度并无相关性。然而,在口服组中,73% 的儿童在第二次就诊时对药物的接受度有所下降,而在鼻饲组中,只有 33% 的儿童在第二次就诊时对药物的接受度有所下降(p = 0.01)。与鼻腔组相比,口腔组患儿的家长对第二次就诊时的用药满意度较低,p = 0.00。首次就诊时的用药接受度差(p = 0.014)和口服给药途径(p = 0.014)是第二次就诊时用药接受度差的预测因素。对于需要进行一次以上牙科治疗的年幼儿童患者,牙医应考虑鼻腔喷雾给药。家长应为儿童可能出现的抗拒或拒绝做好准备。ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符 NCT02679781。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信