COVID-19 Vaccine Communications on Instagram and Vaccine Uptake in Young Adults: A Content Assessment and Public Engagement Analysis

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Caitlin Ford, M. MacKay, A. Thaivalappil, Jennifer McWhirter, Andrew Papadopoulos
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Communications on Instagram and Vaccine Uptake in Young Adults: A Content Assessment and Public Engagement Analysis","authors":"Caitlin Ford, M. MacKay, A. Thaivalappil, Jennifer McWhirter, Andrew Papadopoulos","doi":"10.1177/21676968231222439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Canada, during the pandemic, young adults (18–29 year-olds) represented one of the least-vaccinated age groups against COVID-19. These low vaccination rates, and high infection rates, left young people vulnerable to severe infections and created a risk for transmission to immunocompromised populations. Given young adults’ unique characteristics, to encourage vaccination among this demographic, public health and government officials must adopt an audience-centred approach to communication. We sought to understand if the vaccine messages from 8 Canadian federal government Instagram accounts met the needs of young adults based two frameworks: Guiding Principles for Crisis Communication (compassion and empathy, conversational tone, transparency, clarity, call to action and correction of misinformation), and the 5C Model for Vaccine Hesitancy (confidence, complacency, constraints, collective responsibility, and risk calculation). Across 159 posts that mentioned COVID-19 vaccines, there was limited incorporation of best practices, suggesting the government’s communication strategy did not meet the needs of young people.","PeriodicalId":47330,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Adulthood","volume":"26 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Adulthood","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968231222439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Canada, during the pandemic, young adults (18–29 year-olds) represented one of the least-vaccinated age groups against COVID-19. These low vaccination rates, and high infection rates, left young people vulnerable to severe infections and created a risk for transmission to immunocompromised populations. Given young adults’ unique characteristics, to encourage vaccination among this demographic, public health and government officials must adopt an audience-centred approach to communication. We sought to understand if the vaccine messages from 8 Canadian federal government Instagram accounts met the needs of young adults based two frameworks: Guiding Principles for Crisis Communication (compassion and empathy, conversational tone, transparency, clarity, call to action and correction of misinformation), and the 5C Model for Vaccine Hesitancy (confidence, complacency, constraints, collective responsibility, and risk calculation). Across 159 posts that mentioned COVID-19 vaccines, there was limited incorporation of best practices, suggesting the government’s communication strategy did not meet the needs of young people.
COVID-19 Instagram 上的疫苗传播与年轻人的疫苗接种率:内容评估与公众参与分析
在加拿大,大流行期间,青壮年(18 至 29 岁)是接种 COVID-19 疫苗最少的年龄组之一。低疫苗接种率和高感染率使年轻人很容易受到严重感染,并造成向免疫力低下人群传播的风险。鉴于年轻人的特殊性,要鼓励这一人群接种疫苗,公共卫生和政府官员必须采取以受众为中心的传播方式。我们试图了解来自 8 个加拿大联邦政府 Instagram 账户的疫苗信息是否符合青壮年的需求:危机沟通指导原则(同情和共鸣、对话语气、透明度、清晰度、呼吁行动和纠正错误信息)和疫苗犹豫不决的 5C 模型(信心、自满、限制、集体责任和风险计算)。在提及 COVID-19 疫苗的 159 篇帖子中,采用最佳实践的帖子非常有限,这表明政府的传播策略没有满足年轻人的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emerging Adulthood
Emerging Adulthood Multiple-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
19.20%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信