Evaluation of effectiveness of disaster risk transfer mechanisms in Sri Lanka

 N. Lilackshani
{"title":"Evaluation of effectiveness of disaster risk transfer mechanisms in Sri Lanka","authors":" N. Lilackshani","doi":"10.4038/faruj.v10i2.211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disaster risk transfer (DRT) has been identified as a key strategy for managing disaster risks and increasing community resilience. However, the effectiveness of DRT mechanisms is questionable due to natural, socioeconomic, and political factors that may limit their implementation. This study focuses on the case of Batticaloa, Sri Lanka, to examine the implementation and effectiveness of DRT options in reducing disaster risk and enhancing community resilience. The study conducted a case study in three selected GNDs in the Batticaloa district to explore the criteria to assess the effectiveness of disaster risk transfer options. The data was collected through a survey questionnaire and key informant interviews to gather the participants' attitudes and perceptions of DRT mechanisms. The study found that lack of awareness, high costs, and limited coverage were major factors hindering participation in DRT programs. There were also different perspectives among participants on the roles of the government and insurance companies in disaster risk management. The research highlights the importance of enhancing accessibility and affordability of DRT options, and active government involvement in managing disaster risks. It provides a valuable understanding of the local challenges of DRT in Sri Lanka, and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners.","PeriodicalId":475080,"journal":{"name":"FARU Journal","volume":"29 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARU Journal","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/faruj.v10i2.211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disaster risk transfer (DRT) has been identified as a key strategy for managing disaster risks and increasing community resilience. However, the effectiveness of DRT mechanisms is questionable due to natural, socioeconomic, and political factors that may limit their implementation. This study focuses on the case of Batticaloa, Sri Lanka, to examine the implementation and effectiveness of DRT options in reducing disaster risk and enhancing community resilience. The study conducted a case study in three selected GNDs in the Batticaloa district to explore the criteria to assess the effectiveness of disaster risk transfer options. The data was collected through a survey questionnaire and key informant interviews to gather the participants' attitudes and perceptions of DRT mechanisms. The study found that lack of awareness, high costs, and limited coverage were major factors hindering participation in DRT programs. There were also different perspectives among participants on the roles of the government and insurance companies in disaster risk management. The research highlights the importance of enhancing accessibility and affordability of DRT options, and active government involvement in managing disaster risks. It provides a valuable understanding of the local challenges of DRT in Sri Lanka, and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners.
评估斯里兰卡灾害风险转移机制的有效性
灾害风险转移(DRT)已被确定为管理灾害风险和提高社区抗灾能力的一项重要战略。然而,由于自然、社会经济和政治因素可能会限制灾害风险转移机制的实施,因此其有效性值得怀疑。本研究以斯里兰卡拜蒂克洛为案例,研究灾害风险管理和应对方案在降低灾害风险和提高社区抗灾能力方面的实施情况和有效性。本研究在拜蒂克洛县三个选定的 GND 中进行了案例研究,以探索评估灾害风险转移方案有效性的标准。通过调查问卷和关键信息提供者访谈收集数据,以了解参与者对灾害风险转移机制的态度和看法。研究发现,缺乏认识、成本高昂和覆盖范围有限是阻碍参与 DRT 计划的主要因素。参与者对政府和保险公司在灾害风险管理中的作用也有不同的看法。这项研究强调了提高灾害风险评估选择的可获得性和可负担性以及政府积极参与灾害风险管理的重要性。它为了解斯里兰卡当地的灾害风险管理挑战提供了宝贵的资料,并为政策制定者和从业人员提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信