Teachers’ Collaborative Reflections on Classroom Materials: From Traditional Consumers to Digital Materials Developers and Teacherpreneurs

IF 3.6 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Z. Tajeddin, Fatemeh Asadnia
{"title":"Teachers’ Collaborative Reflections on Classroom Materials: From Traditional Consumers to Digital Materials Developers and Teacherpreneurs","authors":"Z. Tajeddin, Fatemeh Asadnia","doi":"10.1177/00336882231222036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"L2 teachers, no longer considered to be predominantly passive coursebook consumers, act as mediators between pedagogy and materials in the current era of technology-assisted language instruction and should be empowered to digitalize language learning materials to meet the immediate needs of the digital generation. In this study, we aimed to investigate L2 teachers’ collaborative reflections on the current gaps in their classroom coursebook that could be bridged by the purposeful use of digital tools and address their attitudes towards their changing roles as digital materials developers. The findings demonstrated that, in their critical reflections, from a pedagogical perspective, the teachers pinpointed the dominance of passive language usage, the absence of personalized strategy-based instruction, and the lack of interactive content in the coursebook. From a task design perspective, they referred to the dominance of edutainment-free tasks, the prevalence of artificial peer tasks, the lack of multimodal scenario-based tasks, and the absence of adaptive feedback. The teachers further highlighted their shifting roles. As digital materials developers, they could create digital content for the “digital natives,” make digital mini-lessons for classrooms, attend project-based training courses, and co-produce digital content and tasks with students’ assistance. As digital teacherpreneurs, they could run private social media-based businesses, join Edu-Tech co-working spaces, and produce digital artifacts in edutainment centers. As digital materials designers, they could collaborate with computer-assisted language learning (CALL) stakeholders and do interdisciplinary projects in virtual communities. This study promises implications for L2 teachers, teacher educators, and materials developers.","PeriodicalId":46946,"journal":{"name":"Relc Journal","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relc Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231222036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

L2 teachers, no longer considered to be predominantly passive coursebook consumers, act as mediators between pedagogy and materials in the current era of technology-assisted language instruction and should be empowered to digitalize language learning materials to meet the immediate needs of the digital generation. In this study, we aimed to investigate L2 teachers’ collaborative reflections on the current gaps in their classroom coursebook that could be bridged by the purposeful use of digital tools and address their attitudes towards their changing roles as digital materials developers. The findings demonstrated that, in their critical reflections, from a pedagogical perspective, the teachers pinpointed the dominance of passive language usage, the absence of personalized strategy-based instruction, and the lack of interactive content in the coursebook. From a task design perspective, they referred to the dominance of edutainment-free tasks, the prevalence of artificial peer tasks, the lack of multimodal scenario-based tasks, and the absence of adaptive feedback. The teachers further highlighted their shifting roles. As digital materials developers, they could create digital content for the “digital natives,” make digital mini-lessons for classrooms, attend project-based training courses, and co-produce digital content and tasks with students’ assistance. As digital teacherpreneurs, they could run private social media-based businesses, join Edu-Tech co-working spaces, and produce digital artifacts in edutainment centers. As digital materials designers, they could collaborate with computer-assisted language learning (CALL) stakeholders and do interdisciplinary projects in virtual communities. This study promises implications for L2 teachers, teacher educators, and materials developers.
教师对课堂教材的合作反思:从传统消费者到数字教材开发者和教师企业家
第二语言教师不再被视为主要是被动的课本消费者,在当前技术辅助语言教学的时代,他们充当着教学法和教材之间的中介,应该被赋予将语言学习材料数字化的权力,以满足数字化一代的迫切需要。在本研究中,我们旨在调查中级语言教师对目前课堂教学中存在的差距的合作反思,这些差距可以通过有目的地使用数字工具来弥补,并探讨他们对自己作为数字教材开发者的角色转变的态度。研究结果表明,在批判性反思中,教师们从教学角度指出了被动语言使用的主导地位、个性化策略教学的缺失以及教材中互动内容的缺乏。从任务设计的角度来看,他们提到了寓教于乐的任务占主导地位、人为的同伴任务盛行、缺乏多模态情景任务以及缺乏适应性反馈。教师们进一步强调了他们的角色转变。作为数字教材开发者,他们可以为 "数字原住民 "创建数字内容,为课堂制作数字微型课,参加基于项目的培训课程,在学生的协助下共同制作数字内容和任务。作为数字教师企业家,他们可以经营以社交媒体为基础的私人企业,加入 Edu-Tech 联合办公空间,在寓教于乐的中心制作数字艺术品。作为数字教材设计者,他们可以与计算机辅助语言学习(CALL)相关方合作,在虚拟社区开展跨学科项目。本研究对中级语言教师、教师教育者和教材开发者都有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Relc Journal
Relc Journal LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The RELC Journal is a fully peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language education. The aim of this Journal is to present information and ideas on theories, research, methods and materials related to language learning and teaching. Within this framework the Journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current enquiry as first and second language learning and teaching, language and culture, discourse analysis, language planning, language testing, multilingual education, stylistics, translation and information technology. The RELC Journal, therefore, is concerned with linguistics applied to education and contributions that have in mind the common professional concerns of both the practitioner and the researcher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信