Impact of potassium test sample rejections on routine laboratory service, South Africa

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Sarah McAlpine, B. Chale-Matsau
{"title":"Impact of potassium test sample rejections on routine laboratory service, South Africa","authors":"Sarah McAlpine, B. Chale-Matsau","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Accurate potassium measurements are necessary for effective clinical management of hyperkalaemia. Pre-analytical factors may affect laboratory measurements, leading to erroneous results and inappropriate patient management and negatively impact the efficiency and finances of laboratories and hospitals.Objective: This study evaluated the impact of rejected potassium test requests on laboratory service.Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study to assess potassium test data at a public laboratory in Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa, using samples collected from an academic hospital, peripheral hospitals, and outpatient clinics between January 2018 to December 2018. We assessed the relationship between reasons for rejection and health facility type, as well as financial implications for the laboratory.Results: The potassium result rejection rate was 15.1% (29 806 samples), out of the 197 405 requests received. The most common reasons for rejection were old sample ( 1 day old) (41.4%; 12 348 rejections) and haemolysis (38.2%; 11 398 rejections). The most frequent reason for rejections at the central, academic hospital was haemolysis (42.0%), while old sample was the most common reason for rejection at peripheral hospitals (43.4%; 4119/9493 requests) and outpatient health facilities (57.2%; 7208/12 605 requests) (p = 0.022). The total cost of potassium sample rejection over the study period was substantial, given the resource constraints in this setting.Conclusion: Peripheral hospitals and outpatient departments accounted for the majority of rejected potassium testing results, possibly resulting from delays in transportation; causing substantial financial impact on the laboratory. Improved sample collection, handling, and expedited transportation are recommended.What this study adds: This study highlights the importance of appropriate sample collection and handling and the undesirable consequences of non-adherence to these pre-analytical considerations.","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate potassium measurements are necessary for effective clinical management of hyperkalaemia. Pre-analytical factors may affect laboratory measurements, leading to erroneous results and inappropriate patient management and negatively impact the efficiency and finances of laboratories and hospitals.Objective: This study evaluated the impact of rejected potassium test requests on laboratory service.Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study to assess potassium test data at a public laboratory in Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa, using samples collected from an academic hospital, peripheral hospitals, and outpatient clinics between January 2018 to December 2018. We assessed the relationship between reasons for rejection and health facility type, as well as financial implications for the laboratory.Results: The potassium result rejection rate was 15.1% (29 806 samples), out of the 197 405 requests received. The most common reasons for rejection were old sample ( 1 day old) (41.4%; 12 348 rejections) and haemolysis (38.2%; 11 398 rejections). The most frequent reason for rejections at the central, academic hospital was haemolysis (42.0%), while old sample was the most common reason for rejection at peripheral hospitals (43.4%; 4119/9493 requests) and outpatient health facilities (57.2%; 7208/12 605 requests) (p = 0.022). The total cost of potassium sample rejection over the study period was substantial, given the resource constraints in this setting.Conclusion: Peripheral hospitals and outpatient departments accounted for the majority of rejected potassium testing results, possibly resulting from delays in transportation; causing substantial financial impact on the laboratory. Improved sample collection, handling, and expedited transportation are recommended.What this study adds: This study highlights the importance of appropriate sample collection and handling and the undesirable consequences of non-adherence to these pre-analytical considerations.
钾测试样本被拒对常规实验室服务的影响,南非
背景:准确的血钾测量是临床有效治疗高钾血症的必要条件。分析前的因素可能会影响实验室的测量结果,导致错误的结果和不恰当的患者管理,并对实验室和医院的效率和财务状况产生负面影响:本研究评估了钾检测申请被拒对实验室服务的影响:我们进行了一项回顾性描述性研究,评估了南非豪登省比勒陀利亚市一家公共实验室的钾测试数据,使用了 2018 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间从一家学术医院、外围医院和门诊诊所收集的样本。我们评估了拒收原因与医疗机构类型之间的关系,以及对实验室的财务影响:在收到的 197 405 份申请中,钾结果拒收率为 15.1%(29 806 份样本)。最常见的拒收原因是样本过旧(1 天前)(41.4%;12 348 例拒收)和溶血(38.2%;11 398 例拒收)。在中心学术医院,最常见的拒绝原因是溶血(42.0%),而在外围医院(43.4%;4119/9493 次申请)和门诊医疗机构(57.2%;7208/12605 次申请),旧样本是最常见的拒绝原因(p = 0.022)。在研究期间,由于资源有限,钾样本被拒绝的总成本相当可观:结论:外围医院和门诊部是钾检测结果被拒的主要原因,这可能是由于运输延误造成的;这对实验室造成了巨大的经济影响。建议改进样本的采集、处理和快速运输:这项研究强调了适当采集和处理样本的重要性,以及不遵守这些分析前注意事项的不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信