Effect of physical training on motor function of ambulant children with diplegia after selective dorsal rhizotomy: A randomized controlled study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Amira M. Abd-Elmonem, Hazem A. Ali, Sara S Saad-Eldien, Ahmed Rabiee, W. A. Abd El-nabie
{"title":"Effect of physical training on motor function of ambulant children with diplegia after selective dorsal rhizotomy: A randomized controlled study","authors":"Amira M. Abd-Elmonem, Hazem A. Ali, Sara S Saad-Eldien, Ahmed Rabiee, W. A. Abd El-nabie","doi":"10.3233/nre-230098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Children with spastic diplegia experience tonicity, lack of selective motor control, subnormal postural stability and delayed motor development. Selective dorsal rhizotomy followed by physical therapy is a permanent procedure aimed to alleviate hypertonicity. OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) followed by a physical training on gross motor function (GMF), functional balance, walking capacity, selective motor control (SMC) and energy cost of walking (ECW) of ambulant children with spastic diplegia. METHODS: Forty-two children with spastic diplegia aged 5 to 8 years were randomly assigned into the control or SDR-group. Both groups received a designed physical training of progressive functional strength training and standard orthotic management (SOM) 3 times a week for 6 months. GMF, functional balance, ECW, functional capacity and SMC were assessed by gross motor function measure (GMfM-88), pediatric balance scale (PBS), energy expenditure index (EEI), six-minute walking test (6MWT) and selective control assessment of lower extremity (SCALE), respectively. Assessment was carried out before the treatment (baseline), after 6 months (post I) and 1-year follow-up (post II). RESULTS: From baseline to post I and post II assessments, changes of GMF, functional balance, ECW, functional capacity and SMC within the control and SDR groups showed significant improvements (P < 0.001). Moreover, group comparison showed significant differences in favor of the SDR group. CONCLUSION: Integrated physical training followed SDR demonstrated qualitative changes and enhancement in motor function, achieved by spasticity reduction.","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"38 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-230098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with spastic diplegia experience tonicity, lack of selective motor control, subnormal postural stability and delayed motor development. Selective dorsal rhizotomy followed by physical therapy is a permanent procedure aimed to alleviate hypertonicity. OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) followed by a physical training on gross motor function (GMF), functional balance, walking capacity, selective motor control (SMC) and energy cost of walking (ECW) of ambulant children with spastic diplegia. METHODS: Forty-two children with spastic diplegia aged 5 to 8 years were randomly assigned into the control or SDR-group. Both groups received a designed physical training of progressive functional strength training and standard orthotic management (SOM) 3 times a week for 6 months. GMF, functional balance, ECW, functional capacity and SMC were assessed by gross motor function measure (GMfM-88), pediatric balance scale (PBS), energy expenditure index (EEI), six-minute walking test (6MWT) and selective control assessment of lower extremity (SCALE), respectively. Assessment was carried out before the treatment (baseline), after 6 months (post I) and 1-year follow-up (post II). RESULTS: From baseline to post I and post II assessments, changes of GMF, functional balance, ECW, functional capacity and SMC within the control and SDR groups showed significant improvements (P < 0.001). Moreover, group comparison showed significant differences in favor of the SDR group. CONCLUSION: Integrated physical training followed SDR demonstrated qualitative changes and enhancement in motor function, achieved by spasticity reduction.
体能训练对选择性背根切断术后行动不便儿童运动功能的影响:随机对照研究
背景:患有痉挛性截瘫的儿童会出现肌张力过高、缺乏选择性运动控制、姿势稳定性不正常以及运动发育迟缓等症状。选择性背侧根神经切断术后再进行物理治疗,是一种旨在缓解肌张力过高的永久性治疗方法。目的:探讨选择性背侧肌根切术(SDR)后进行物理训练对痉挛性截瘫患儿的粗大运动功能(GMF)、功能平衡、行走能力、选择性运动控制(SMC)和行走能量成本(ECW)的影响。方法:42 名 5 至 8 岁的痉挛性截瘫儿童被随机分配到对照组或 SDR 组。两组均接受设计好的体能训练,包括渐进式功能力量训练和标准矫形管理(SOM),每周 3 次,为期 6 个月。分别通过粗大运动功能测量(GMfM-88)、小儿平衡量表(PBS)、能量消耗指数(EEI)、六分钟步行测试(6MWT)和下肢选择性控制评估(SCALE)来评估粗大运动功能、功能平衡、ECW、功能能力和SMC。评估分别在治疗前(基线)、6 个月后(I 期)和 1 年随访后(II 期)进行。结果:从基线到 I 后和 II 后评估,对照组和 SDR 组的 GMF、功能平衡、ECW、功能能力和 SMC 均有显著改善(P < 0.001)。此外,组间比较显示,SDR 组有明显差异。结论:SDR 后的综合体能训练显示了运动功能的质变和增强,并通过减轻痉挛得以实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信