Controversies and future directions in the management of gallbladder cancer

J. Lendoire, L. Gil
{"title":"Controversies and future directions in the management of gallbladder cancer","authors":"J. Lendoire, L. Gil","doi":"10.1097/ot9.0000000000000003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignancy worldwide, with 140,000 new patients each year and more than 100,000 deaths annually. The review aims to address the controversial aspects of managing GBC. Regional differences of the study worldwide remain pending, and comparative mutational profiles will provide more information on the pathogenesis of GBC. However, certain pathologic aspects are discussed, such as the staging of early GBC, outcome differences between T2 pathologically staged patients, and the necessity of a uniform pathologic report. The surgical management of GBC is still under debate. The extent of liver resection, type of lymphadenectomy, and selection of patients for extended resection are aspects of the disease that require revision. Laparoscopic and robotic approaches were initially slow to develop. However, with time, they have demonstrated their value in the surgical management of GBC. The OMEGA survey, performed to analyze the management practice of surgical treatment of GBC worldwide, demonstrated differences from the recommended guidelines. The OMEGA study, the largest cohort study, examined the outcomes of surgical intervention in 3676 patients from 133 centers. Regarding future directions, the value of collaborative efforts between centers and regions must be emphasized to better understand the different aspects of the disease and globally improve therapeutic strategies for GBC.","PeriodicalId":345149,"journal":{"name":"Oncology and Translational Medicine","volume":"40 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ot9.0000000000000003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignancy worldwide, with 140,000 new patients each year and more than 100,000 deaths annually. The review aims to address the controversial aspects of managing GBC. Regional differences of the study worldwide remain pending, and comparative mutational profiles will provide more information on the pathogenesis of GBC. However, certain pathologic aspects are discussed, such as the staging of early GBC, outcome differences between T2 pathologically staged patients, and the necessity of a uniform pathologic report. The surgical management of GBC is still under debate. The extent of liver resection, type of lymphadenectomy, and selection of patients for extended resection are aspects of the disease that require revision. Laparoscopic and robotic approaches were initially slow to develop. However, with time, they have demonstrated their value in the surgical management of GBC. The OMEGA survey, performed to analyze the management practice of surgical treatment of GBC worldwide, demonstrated differences from the recommended guidelines. The OMEGA study, the largest cohort study, examined the outcomes of surgical intervention in 3676 patients from 133 centers. Regarding future directions, the value of collaborative efforts between centers and regions must be emphasized to better understand the different aspects of the disease and globally improve therapeutic strategies for GBC.
胆囊癌治疗的争议和未来方向
胆囊癌(GBC)是全球罕见的恶性肿瘤,每年新增患者 14 万人,每年死亡人数超过 10 万人。本综述旨在探讨管理 GBC 的争议性问题。全球范围内研究的地区差异仍悬而未决,比较突变图谱将为 GBC 的发病机制提供更多信息。然而,本文讨论了某些病理方面的问题,如早期 GBC 的分期、T2 病理分期患者的预后差异以及统一病理报告的必要性。GBC 的手术治疗仍在争论之中。肝脏切除的范围、淋巴腺切除的类型以及选择扩大切除范围的患者都是需要修正的方面。腹腔镜和机器人方法最初发展缓慢。然而,随着时间的推移,它们在 GBC 手术治疗中的价值得到了证明。OMEGA 调查旨在分析全球 GBC 外科治疗的管理实践,结果显示与推荐指南存在差异。OMEGA 研究是规模最大的队列研究,调查了来自 133 个中心的 3676 名患者的手术治疗结果。关于未来的发展方向,必须强调中心和地区之间合作的价值,以更好地了解疾病的不同方面,并在全球范围内改进 GBC 的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信