Risk evaluation of splenic hilar lymph node metastasis and survival analysis of patients with advanced gastric cancer

Guang-cai Niu, Youlong Zhu, Xuanxuan Xiong
{"title":"Risk evaluation of splenic hilar lymph node metastasis and survival analysis of patients with advanced gastric cancer","authors":"Guang-cai Niu, Youlong Zhu, Xuanxuan Xiong","doi":"10.1097/ot9.0000000000000010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n There is no consensus regarding the influence of prophylactic no. 10 lymph node (LN) dissection in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to evaluate whether patients with AGC could benefit from no. 10 LN dissection and to explore the clinicopathological indicators of no. 10 LN metastasis.\n \n \n \n We analyzed the data of 218 patients with AGC who underwent standard D2 lymphadenectomy (SD2; n = 108) or modified D2 lymphadenectomy (MD2; n = 110) between January 2017 and January 2021. In addition, we examined factors influencing no. 10 LN metastasis in the SD2 group.\n \n \n \n Differentiation, tumor location, and no. 4 positive LNs were significantly correlated with no. 10 LN metastasis (P < 0.05). Borrmann classification, differentiation, depth of invasion, LN metastasis (N), and tumor size were found to correlate with survival in univariate analyses. Age, sex, extent of gastrectomy, tumor location, and extent of lymphadenectomy were not associated with survival (P > 0.05). The median survival times were 72.23 and 68.56 months for the SD2 and MD2 groups, respectively (P = 0.635). Postoperative major morbidity and mortality rates were 37.96% and 3.70% in the SD2 group, and 23.64% and 1.82% in the MD2 group, respectively.\n \n \n \n Based on our findings, prophylactic no. 10 lymphadenectomy may be recommended in patients with AGC who exhibit positive no. 4 LN status, poor differentiation, and tumors located on the greater curvature.\n","PeriodicalId":345149,"journal":{"name":"Oncology and Translational Medicine","volume":"5 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ot9.0000000000000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no consensus regarding the influence of prophylactic no. 10 lymph node (LN) dissection in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to evaluate whether patients with AGC could benefit from no. 10 LN dissection and to explore the clinicopathological indicators of no. 10 LN metastasis. We analyzed the data of 218 patients with AGC who underwent standard D2 lymphadenectomy (SD2; n = 108) or modified D2 lymphadenectomy (MD2; n = 110) between January 2017 and January 2021. In addition, we examined factors influencing no. 10 LN metastasis in the SD2 group. Differentiation, tumor location, and no. 4 positive LNs were significantly correlated with no. 10 LN metastasis (P < 0.05). Borrmann classification, differentiation, depth of invasion, LN metastasis (N), and tumor size were found to correlate with survival in univariate analyses. Age, sex, extent of gastrectomy, tumor location, and extent of lymphadenectomy were not associated with survival (P > 0.05). The median survival times were 72.23 and 68.56 months for the SD2 and MD2 groups, respectively (P = 0.635). Postoperative major morbidity and mortality rates were 37.96% and 3.70% in the SD2 group, and 23.64% and 1.82% in the MD2 group, respectively. Based on our findings, prophylactic no. 10 lymphadenectomy may be recommended in patients with AGC who exhibit positive no. 4 LN status, poor differentiation, and tumors located on the greater curvature.
晚期胃癌患者脾门淋巴结转移的风险评估和生存分析
关于对晚期胃癌(AGC)患者进行预防性 No.10淋巴结(LN)清扫术对晚期胃癌(AGC)患者的影响尚未达成共识。我们的目的是评估 AGC 患者是否能从 10 号淋巴结清扫术中获益,并探讨其临床病理变化。10号淋巴结转移的临床病理指标。 我们分析了2017年1月至2021年1月期间接受标准D2淋巴结切除术(SD2;n = 108)或改良D2淋巴结切除术(MD2;n = 110)的218例AGC患者的数据。此外,我们还研究了影响No.10淋巴结转移的影响因素。 分化、肿瘤位置和 no.4个阳性LN与10号LN转移明显相关(P<0.05)。单变量分析发现,Borrmann分类、分化、浸润深度、LN转移(N)和肿瘤大小与生存率相关。年龄、性别、胃切除范围、肿瘤位置和淋巴结切除范围与生存率无关(P > 0.05)。SD2组和MD2组的中位生存时间分别为72.23个月和68.56个月(P = 0.635)。SD2组术后主要发病率和死亡率分别为37.96%和3.70%,MD2组分别为23.64%和1.82%。 根据我们的研究结果,预防性 No.10淋巴结切除术。4淋巴结阳性、分化差以及肿瘤位于大弯处的AGC患者,建议进行预防性10号淋巴结切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信