Efficacy of continuous arterial perfusion chemotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization regional arterial thermal perfusion in the treatment of pancreatic cancer with liver metastases

Zhuo Zhong, Jian Yang, Jing-Zi Luo, Xiong Xie, Zhi-Mei Huang, De Long
{"title":"Efficacy of continuous arterial perfusion chemotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization regional arterial thermal perfusion in the treatment of pancreatic cancer with liver metastases","authors":"Zhuo Zhong, Jian Yang, Jing-Zi Luo, Xiong Xie, Zhi-Mei Huang, De Long","doi":"10.1097/ot9.0000000000000001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of continuous transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis.\n \n \n \n Sixty patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and liver metastases were enrolled in this study. In the treatment group, 31 patients underwent continuous transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with TACE regional arterial thermal perfusion, whereas 29 patients included in the control group received intravenous chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1. All patients received maintenance chemotherapy with S-1 after 4 cycles of the study regimen. Treatment efficacy, quality of life, survival, and toxicity were evaluated.\n \n \n \n Efficacy was better in the treatment group than in the control group, as reflected by the objective remission, partial remission, and disease progression rates (all P < 0.05). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and Numerical Rating Scale pain scores were also higher in the treatment group (both P < 0.05). In survival analysis, the 1-year overall survival rates in the treatment and control groups were 64.516% and 10.345%, respectively, whereas the median overall survival times were 16 and 6 months, respectively (both P < 0.05). The 6-month progression-free survival rates in the treatment and control groups were 77.419% and 13.790%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival times were 12 and 3 months, respectively (both P < 0.05). The rates of hematological and nonhematological toxicological adverse effects were also lower in the treatment group (both P < 0.05). Although the rate of liver dysfunction was higher in the treatment group, this finding had no adverse effects on prognosis.\n \n \n \n Continuous transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with TACE regional arterial perfusion chemotherapy resulted in better efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer and liver metastasis, suggesting its utility as a reference method for the clinical treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.\n","PeriodicalId":345149,"journal":{"name":"Oncology and Translational Medicine","volume":"7 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ot9.0000000000000001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of continuous transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis. Sixty patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and liver metastases were enrolled in this study. In the treatment group, 31 patients underwent continuous transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with TACE regional arterial thermal perfusion, whereas 29 patients included in the control group received intravenous chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1. All patients received maintenance chemotherapy with S-1 after 4 cycles of the study regimen. Treatment efficacy, quality of life, survival, and toxicity were evaluated. Efficacy was better in the treatment group than in the control group, as reflected by the objective remission, partial remission, and disease progression rates (all P < 0.05). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and Numerical Rating Scale pain scores were also higher in the treatment group (both P < 0.05). In survival analysis, the 1-year overall survival rates in the treatment and control groups were 64.516% and 10.345%, respectively, whereas the median overall survival times were 16 and 6 months, respectively (both P < 0.05). The 6-month progression-free survival rates in the treatment and control groups were 77.419% and 13.790%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival times were 12 and 3 months, respectively (both P < 0.05). The rates of hematological and nonhematological toxicological adverse effects were also lower in the treatment group (both P < 0.05). Although the rate of liver dysfunction was higher in the treatment group, this finding had no adverse effects on prognosis. Continuous transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with TACE regional arterial perfusion chemotherapy resulted in better efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer and liver metastasis, suggesting its utility as a reference method for the clinical treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.
持续动脉灌注化疗联合经动脉化疗栓塞区域动脉热灌注治疗肝转移胰腺癌的疗效
该研究旨在探讨持续经导管动脉输注化疗联合经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗晚期胰腺癌肝转移的疗效。 这项研究共招募了 60 名晚期胰腺癌肝转移患者。在治疗组中,31 名患者接受了连续经导管动脉输注化疗和 TACE 区域动脉热灌注,而对照组中的 29 名患者则接受了吉西他滨和 S-1 静脉化疗。所有患者在接受4个周期的研究方案后都接受了S-1的维持化疗。对治疗效果、生活质量、存活率和毒性进行了评估。 从客观缓解率、部分缓解率和疾病进展率来看,治疗组的疗效优于对照组(P均<0.05)。治疗组的东部肿瘤合作组和数字评分量表疼痛评分也更高(均为 P <0.05)。在生存分析中,治疗组和对照组的1年总生存率分别为64.516%和10.345%,中位总生存时间分别为16个月和6个月(均为P < 0.05)。治疗组和对照组的6个月无进展生存率分别为77.419%和13.790%,中位无进展生存时间分别为12个月和3个月(均为P < 0.05)。治疗组的血液学和非血液学毒性不良反应发生率也较低(均为 P < 0.05)。虽然治疗组的肝功能异常率较高,但这一结果对预后没有不良影响。 连续经导管动脉灌注化疗联合TACE区域动脉灌注化疗在胰腺癌肝转移患者中取得了更好的疗效和安全性,可作为晚期胰腺癌临床治疗的参考方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信