Eye-tracking research on teacher professional vision: A meta-analytic review

IF 9.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Özün Keskin , Tina Seidel , Kathleen Stürmer , Andreas Gegenfurtner
{"title":"Eye-tracking research on teacher professional vision: A meta-analytic review","authors":"Özün Keskin ,&nbsp;Tina Seidel ,&nbsp;Kathleen Stürmer ,&nbsp;Andreas Gegenfurtner","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An increasing number of research groups worldwide use eye tracking to study the professional vision and visual expertise of pre-service and in-service teachers. These studies offer evidence about how teachers process complex visual information in classrooms. Focusing on this growing evidence, the present meta-analytic review (<em>k</em><span> = 98 studies) aims to systematically aggregate and integrate past eye-tracking research on teacher professional vision and teacher noticing. Four goals are addressed. First, we review the methodological characteristics of past eye-tracking studies in terms of their sample, stimulus, and eye movement characteristics. The results show that most studies use mobile eye-tracking devices in action or remote eye trackers with classroom videos on action; less frequently used are photographs and virtual classroom simulations. The average sample size of the reviewed studies is 13 in-service and 13 pre-service teachers per study, indicating the benefit of meta-analytic synthesis. Second, we meta-analyze expertise-related differences between experienced and inexperienced teachers in two frequently used eye movement measures—teacher gaze proportions and the Gini coefficient as a measure of teachers’ equal gaze distribution in the classroom. Results suggest that experienced teachers had higher gaze proportions on the students in the classroom than inexperienced teachers (</span><em>g</em> = 0.926) who, in turn, gazed more often on instructional material and other objects in the classroom. Experienced teachers distributed their gaze more evenly than inexperienced teachers between students in the classroom (<em>g</em><span> = 0.501). Third, we synthesize the results reported in eye-tracking research on the processes of teacher professional vision using the cognitive theory<span> of visual expertise as an organizing framework; the review also discusses boundary conditions of eye-tracking research with regard to student, teacher, and instructional characteristics. Fourth, we review studies exploring the use of gaze replays and eye movement modeling examples as an instructional tool to support reflection in teacher education and teacher professional development.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100586"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000799","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An increasing number of research groups worldwide use eye tracking to study the professional vision and visual expertise of pre-service and in-service teachers. These studies offer evidence about how teachers process complex visual information in classrooms. Focusing on this growing evidence, the present meta-analytic review (k = 98 studies) aims to systematically aggregate and integrate past eye-tracking research on teacher professional vision and teacher noticing. Four goals are addressed. First, we review the methodological characteristics of past eye-tracking studies in terms of their sample, stimulus, and eye movement characteristics. The results show that most studies use mobile eye-tracking devices in action or remote eye trackers with classroom videos on action; less frequently used are photographs and virtual classroom simulations. The average sample size of the reviewed studies is 13 in-service and 13 pre-service teachers per study, indicating the benefit of meta-analytic synthesis. Second, we meta-analyze expertise-related differences between experienced and inexperienced teachers in two frequently used eye movement measures—teacher gaze proportions and the Gini coefficient as a measure of teachers’ equal gaze distribution in the classroom. Results suggest that experienced teachers had higher gaze proportions on the students in the classroom than inexperienced teachers (g = 0.926) who, in turn, gazed more often on instructional material and other objects in the classroom. Experienced teachers distributed their gaze more evenly than inexperienced teachers between students in the classroom (g = 0.501). Third, we synthesize the results reported in eye-tracking research on the processes of teacher professional vision using the cognitive theory of visual expertise as an organizing framework; the review also discusses boundary conditions of eye-tracking research with regard to student, teacher, and instructional characteristics. Fourth, we review studies exploring the use of gaze replays and eye movement modeling examples as an instructional tool to support reflection in teacher education and teacher professional development.

关于教师职业愿景的眼动跟踪研究:元分析综述
世界上越来越多的研究小组利用眼动仪研究职前和在职教师的专业视觉和视觉专业知识。这些研究为教师如何在课堂上处理复杂的视觉信息提供了证据。针对这些日益增多的证据,本荟萃分析综述(k = 98 项研究)旨在系统地汇总和整合以往有关教师专业视力和教师注意的眼动追踪研究。我们的目标有四个。首先,我们从样本、刺激物和眼动特征等方面回顾了以往眼动追踪研究的方法特点。研究结果表明,大多数研究使用了移动眼动跟踪设备或远程眼动跟踪仪和课堂视频;较少使用照片和虚拟课堂模拟。所审查研究的平均样本量为每项研究 13 名在职教师和 13 名职前教师,这表明了元分析综合的好处。其次,我们对经验丰富的教师和经验不足的教师在两个常用眼动测量指标--教师注视比例和衡量教师在课堂上平等注视分布的基尼系数--上与专业知识相关的差异进行了元分析。结果表明,经验丰富的教师在课堂上注视学生的比例高于经验不足的教师(g = 0.926),而经验不足的教师则更多地注视教学材料和课堂上的其他物体。经验丰富的教师比经验不足的教师更均匀地将目光投向教室中的学生(g = 0.501)。第三,我们以视觉专业知识的认知理论为组织框架,对有关教师专业视觉过程的眼动跟踪研究结果进行了综述;综述还讨论了眼动跟踪研究在学生、教师和教学特点方面的边界条件。第四,我们回顾了探索将凝视回放和眼动模型示例作为教学工具以支持教师教育和教师专业发展中的反思的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信