Alisa R Zoltowski, Michelle D Failla, Jennifer M Quinde-Zlibut, Kacie Dunham-Carr, Estephan J Moana-Filho, Greg K Essick, Grace T Baranek, Baxter Rogers, Carissa J Cascio
{"title":"Differences in temporal profile of brain responses by pleasantness of somatosensory stimulation in autistic individuals.","authors":"Alisa R Zoltowski, Michelle D Failla, Jennifer M Quinde-Zlibut, Kacie Dunham-Carr, Estephan J Moana-Filho, Greg K Essick, Grace T Baranek, Baxter Rogers, Carissa J Cascio","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2023.2294715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose/Aim</b>. Autistic individuals may show either <i>hyper-</i> or <i>hypo-</i> responsiveness to touch compared to non-autistic individuals. These behavioural responses depend on perceptual and evaluative mechanisms, which unfold sequentially and thus can be distinguished by exploring the timing of neural responses. In this study, we examined neural response timing to pleasant, unpleasant, and affectively neutral textures, to determine whether these perceptual versus evaluative subprocesses differ in autism and how each subprocess contributes to behavioural responses.<b>Materials and Methods.</b> Our sample included <i>n</i> = 13 autistic and <i>n</i> = 14 non-autistic adults who completed functional magnetic resonance imaging. We analysed early, intermediate, and late phases of the tactile response, derived from studies of noxious tactile stimulation, to three different textures.<b>Results.</b> The autistic group showed distinct differences from the non-autistic group to each of the textures, showing earlier, somatosensory differences in response to the pleasantly and unpleasantly rated textures and later, frontomotor differences in response to the neutrally rated texture. Further, reduced early phase response to the pleasant texture correlated with increased sensory seeking behaviour.<b>Conclusions.</b> While preliminary, these results suggest distinct patterns between autistic and non-autistic individuals in how the neural response to touch unfolds and its correspondence with the perceived pleasantness of tactile experience. The findings suggest perceptual differences in response to affectively charged textures and evaluative differences in response to neutral, ambiguous textures. These temporal properties may inform future studies of tactile processing in autism, lending a better understanding of <i>how</i> individuals differ in their sensory experiences across contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":94211,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory & motor research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory & motor research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2023.2294715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose/Aim. Autistic individuals may show either hyper- or hypo- responsiveness to touch compared to non-autistic individuals. These behavioural responses depend on perceptual and evaluative mechanisms, which unfold sequentially and thus can be distinguished by exploring the timing of neural responses. In this study, we examined neural response timing to pleasant, unpleasant, and affectively neutral textures, to determine whether these perceptual versus evaluative subprocesses differ in autism and how each subprocess contributes to behavioural responses.Materials and Methods. Our sample included n = 13 autistic and n = 14 non-autistic adults who completed functional magnetic resonance imaging. We analysed early, intermediate, and late phases of the tactile response, derived from studies of noxious tactile stimulation, to three different textures.Results. The autistic group showed distinct differences from the non-autistic group to each of the textures, showing earlier, somatosensory differences in response to the pleasantly and unpleasantly rated textures and later, frontomotor differences in response to the neutrally rated texture. Further, reduced early phase response to the pleasant texture correlated with increased sensory seeking behaviour.Conclusions. While preliminary, these results suggest distinct patterns between autistic and non-autistic individuals in how the neural response to touch unfolds and its correspondence with the perceived pleasantness of tactile experience. The findings suggest perceptual differences in response to affectively charged textures and evaluative differences in response to neutral, ambiguous textures. These temporal properties may inform future studies of tactile processing in autism, lending a better understanding of how individuals differ in their sensory experiences across contexts.
目的/目标。与非自闭症患者相比,自闭症患者对触觉的反应可能过强或过弱。这些行为反应取决于感知和评价机制,它们依次展开,因此可以通过探索神经反应的时间来加以区分。在这项研究中,我们检测了神经对愉快、不愉快和情感中性纹理的反应时间,以确定自闭症患者的这些感知与评价子过程是否存在差异,以及每个子过程如何对行为反应做出贡献。我们的样本包括 n = 13 名自闭症成人和 n = 14 名非自闭症成人,他们都完成了功能磁共振成像。我们分析了触觉反应的早期、中期和晚期阶段,这些阶段来自对三种不同质地的有害触觉刺激的研究。自闭症患儿对每种纹理的反应都与非自闭症患儿存在明显差异,对令人愉悦和令人不快的纹理的反应表现出较早的躯体感觉差异,而对中性纹理的反应则表现出较迟的前额运动差异。此外,对令人愉悦的纹理的早期反应减少与寻求感官的行为增加有关。虽然是初步研究,但这些结果表明,自闭症患者和非自闭症患者对触觉的神经反应及其与触觉体验愉悦程度的对应关系有着不同的模式。研究结果表明,自闭症患者对带有情感色彩的纹理的反应存在知觉差异,而对中性、模糊纹理的反应则存在评价差异。这些时间特性可为今后研究自闭症患者的触觉处理提供参考,从而更好地理解个体在不同情境下的感官体验有何不同。