Pilar Cacho-Martínez , Mario Cantó-Cerdán , Francisco Lara-Lacárcel , Ángel García-Muñoz
{"title":"Assessing the role of visual dysfunctions in the association between visual symptomatology and the use of digital devices","authors":"Pilar Cacho-Martínez , Mario Cantó-Cerdán , Francisco Lara-Lacárcel , Ángel García-Muñoz","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the association between visual symptoms and use of digital devices considering the presence of visual dysfunctions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An optometric examination was conducted in a clinical sample of 346 patients to diagnose any type of visual anomaly. Visual symptoms were collected using the validated SQVD questionnaire. A threshold of 6 hours per day was used to quantify the effects of digital device usage and patients were divided into two groups: under and above of 35 years old. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate the association between digital device use and symptoms, with visual dysfunctions considered as a confounding variable. Crude and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each variable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>57.02 % of the subjects reported visual symptoms, and 65.02% exhibited some form of visual dysfunction. For patients under 35 years old, an association was found between having visual symptoms and digital device use (OR = 2.10, <em>p</em> = 0.01). However, after adjusting for visual dysfunctions, this association disappeared (OR = 1.44, <em>p</em> = 0.27) and the association was instead between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 6.52, <em>p</em> < 0.001), accommodative (OR = 10.47, <em>p</em> < 0.001), binocular (OR = 6.68, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and accommodative plus binocular dysfunctions (OR = 46.84, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Among patients over 35 years old, no association was found between symptoms and the use of digital devices (OR = 1.27, <em>p</em> = 0.49) but there was an association between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 3.54, <em>p</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Visual symptoms are not dependent on the duration of digital device use but rather on the presence of any type of visual dysfunction: refractive, accommodative and/or binocular one, which should be diagnosed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000584/pdfft?md5=574ea5b5c736bb93ffc991d577053571&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000584-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the association between visual symptoms and use of digital devices considering the presence of visual dysfunctions.
Methods
An optometric examination was conducted in a clinical sample of 346 patients to diagnose any type of visual anomaly. Visual symptoms were collected using the validated SQVD questionnaire. A threshold of 6 hours per day was used to quantify the effects of digital device usage and patients were divided into two groups: under and above of 35 years old. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate the association between digital device use and symptoms, with visual dysfunctions considered as a confounding variable. Crude and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each variable.
Results
57.02 % of the subjects reported visual symptoms, and 65.02% exhibited some form of visual dysfunction. For patients under 35 years old, an association was found between having visual symptoms and digital device use (OR = 2.10, p = 0.01). However, after adjusting for visual dysfunctions, this association disappeared (OR = 1.44, p = 0.27) and the association was instead between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 6.52, p < 0.001), accommodative (OR = 10.47, p < 0.001), binocular (OR = 6.68, p < 0.001) and accommodative plus binocular dysfunctions (OR = 46.84, p < 0.001). Among patients over 35 years old, no association was found between symptoms and the use of digital devices (OR = 1.27, p = 0.49) but there was an association between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 3.54, p = 0.001).
Conclusions
Visual symptoms are not dependent on the duration of digital device use but rather on the presence of any type of visual dysfunction: refractive, accommodative and/or binocular one, which should be diagnosed.