Real-world evaluation of smartphone-based artificial intelligence to screen for diabetic retinopathy in Dominica: a clinical validation study.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Oliver Kemp, Covadonga Bascaran, Edyta Cartwright, Lauren McQuillan, Nanda Matthew, Hazel Shillingford-Ricketts, Marcia Zondervan, Allen Foster, Matthew Burton
{"title":"Real-world evaluation of smartphone-based artificial intelligence to screen for diabetic retinopathy in Dominica: a clinical validation study.","authors":"Oliver Kemp, Covadonga Bascaran, Edyta Cartwright, Lauren McQuillan, Nanda Matthew, Hazel Shillingford-Ricketts, Marcia Zondervan, Allen Foster, Matthew Burton","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several artificial intelligence (AI) systems for diabetic retinopathy screening have been validated but there is limited evidence on their performance in real-world settings. This study aimed to assess the performance of an AI software deployed within the diabetic retinopathy screening programme in Dominica.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional clinical validation study. Patients with diabetes aged 18 years and above attending the diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care facilities in Dominica from 5 June to 3 July 2021 were enrolled.Grading was done at the point of care by the field grader, followed by counselling and referral to the eye clinic. Images were then graded by an AI system. Sensitivity, specificity with 95% CIs and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for comparing the AI to field grader as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 587 participants were screened. The AI had a sensitivity and specificity for detecting referable diabetic retinopathy of 77.5% and 91.5% compared with the grader, for all participants, including ungradable images. The AUC was 0.8455. Excluding 52 participants deemed ungradable by the grader, the AI had a sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and 91.5%, with an AUC of 0.9648.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that AI has the potential to be deployed to assist a diabetic screening programme in a middle-income real-world setting and perform with reasonable accuracy compared with a specialist grader.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Several artificial intelligence (AI) systems for diabetic retinopathy screening have been validated but there is limited evidence on their performance in real-world settings. This study aimed to assess the performance of an AI software deployed within the diabetic retinopathy screening programme in Dominica.

Methods and analysis: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional clinical validation study. Patients with diabetes aged 18 years and above attending the diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care facilities in Dominica from 5 June to 3 July 2021 were enrolled.Grading was done at the point of care by the field grader, followed by counselling and referral to the eye clinic. Images were then graded by an AI system. Sensitivity, specificity with 95% CIs and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for comparing the AI to field grader as gold standard.

Results: A total of 587 participants were screened. The AI had a sensitivity and specificity for detecting referable diabetic retinopathy of 77.5% and 91.5% compared with the grader, for all participants, including ungradable images. The AUC was 0.8455. Excluding 52 participants deemed ungradable by the grader, the AI had a sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and 91.5%, with an AUC of 0.9648.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence that AI has the potential to be deployed to assist a diabetic screening programme in a middle-income real-world setting and perform with reasonable accuracy compared with a specialist grader.

基于智能手机的人工智能筛查多米尼克糖尿病视网膜病变的真实世界评估:临床验证研究。
目的:一些用于糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的人工智能(AI)系统已经过验证,但有关其在实际环境中的表现的证据却很有限。本研究旨在评估部署在多米尼克糖尿病视网膜病变筛查项目中的人工智能软件的性能:我们进行了一项前瞻性、横断面临床验证研究。2021年6月5日至7月3日期间,在多米尼克初级医疗机构接受糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的18岁及以上糖尿病患者被纳入研究。然后由人工智能系统对图像进行分级。结果显示,共有 587 名参与者接受了筛查:共有 587 人接受了筛查。对于所有参与者,包括无法分级的图像,人工智能与分级仪相比,在检测可转诊的糖尿病视网膜病变方面的灵敏度和特异度分别为 77.5%和 91.5%。AUC为0.8455。排除 52 名被分级仪认为不可分级的参与者,人工智能的灵敏度和特异性分别为 81.4% 和 91.5%,AUC 为 0.9648:这项研究证明,在中等收入的真实世界环境中,人工智能有可能被用于协助糖尿病筛查计划,与专业分级人员相比,人工智能的准确性相当高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信