Global synthesis of effects and feedbacks from artificial reefs on socioecological systems in recreational fisheries

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Lisa Chong, Zachary A. Siders, Kai Lorenzen, Robert N. M. Ahrens, Edward V. Camp
{"title":"Global synthesis of effects and feedbacks from artificial reefs on socioecological systems in recreational fisheries","authors":"Lisa Chong,&nbsp;Zachary A. Siders,&nbsp;Kai Lorenzen,&nbsp;Robert N. M. Ahrens,&nbsp;Edward V. Camp","doi":"10.1111/faf.12809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial reefs have been widely deployed with the intention of increasing fish habitat, enhancing recreational fishery opportunities and providing socio-economic benefits to surrounding communities. Substantial work has been done to understand the ecology of artificial reefs but the efficacy of artificial reefs as a management tool hinges on socioecological feedbacks that are not well understood. Socioecological feedbacks are difficult to discern because they depend on multiple and complex interactions between fish, fishers, managers and habitats. To better understand the net effects of artificial reefs on recreational fisheries, we conducted a literature review to catalogue effects and feedbacks of artificial reefs. Our global synthesis revealed that artificial reefs may result in a net negative effect on fish populations, at least in the short-term, as catch-driven effects bolstering socio-economic objectives occur more often or at greater intensities than positive biological effects. We have highlighted important effects of artificial reefs and feedbacks that need to be accounted for when considering their deployment in fishery management. There may be unintended consequences if biological benefits from habitat-to-fish and fish-to-fish feedbacks are outweighed by population losses due to greater socio-economic benefits from fish-to-fisher feedbacks. Taken in concert with their semi-permanent nature and apparent popularity with stakeholders, a view emerges of artificial reefs possibly functioning as a ‘social-ecological trap’. This work emphasizes the need for robust assessments of the effects of artificial reefs, as well as more formal decision science approaches for implementing of these structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"25 2","pages":"303-319"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12809","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12809","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial reefs have been widely deployed with the intention of increasing fish habitat, enhancing recreational fishery opportunities and providing socio-economic benefits to surrounding communities. Substantial work has been done to understand the ecology of artificial reefs but the efficacy of artificial reefs as a management tool hinges on socioecological feedbacks that are not well understood. Socioecological feedbacks are difficult to discern because they depend on multiple and complex interactions between fish, fishers, managers and habitats. To better understand the net effects of artificial reefs on recreational fisheries, we conducted a literature review to catalogue effects and feedbacks of artificial reefs. Our global synthesis revealed that artificial reefs may result in a net negative effect on fish populations, at least in the short-term, as catch-driven effects bolstering socio-economic objectives occur more often or at greater intensities than positive biological effects. We have highlighted important effects of artificial reefs and feedbacks that need to be accounted for when considering their deployment in fishery management. There may be unintended consequences if biological benefits from habitat-to-fish and fish-to-fish feedbacks are outweighed by population losses due to greater socio-economic benefits from fish-to-fisher feedbacks. Taken in concert with their semi-permanent nature and apparent popularity with stakeholders, a view emerges of artificial reefs possibly functioning as a ‘social-ecological trap’. This work emphasizes the need for robust assessments of the effects of artificial reefs, as well as more formal decision science approaches for implementing of these structures.

Abstract Image

人工鱼礁对休闲渔业社会生态系统的影响和反馈的全球综述
人工鱼礁已被广泛部署,目的是增加鱼类栖息地,增加休闲渔业机会,并为周边社区带来社会经济效益。为了解人工鱼礁的生态学已做了大量工作,但人工鱼礁作为管理工具的功效取决于社会生态反馈,而人们对社会生态反馈的了解并不深入。社会生态反馈很难辨别,因为它们取决于鱼类、渔民、管理者和栖息地之间多种复杂的相互作用。为了更好地了解人工鱼礁对休闲渔业的净影响,我们进行了文献综述,对人工鱼礁的影响和反馈进行了编目。我们的全球综述显示,人工鱼礁可能会对鱼类种群产生净负面影响,至少在短期内是这样,因为与积极的生物效应相比,渔获量驱动效应更频繁或强度更大,从而促进社会经济目标的实现。我们强调了人工鱼礁的重要影响以及在渔业管理中考虑部署人工鱼礁时需要考虑的反馈。如果生境对鱼类和鱼类对鱼类的反馈所带来的生物效益被鱼类对鱼类反馈所带来的更大社会经济效益所造成的种群损失所抵消,可能会产生意想不到的后果。再加上人工鱼礁的半永久性和明显受到利益相关者的青睐,人工鱼礁可能成为 "社会生态陷阱"。这项工作强调,需要对人工鱼礁的影响进行可靠的评估,并采用更正式的决策科学方法来实施这些结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信