{"title":"Enhancing direct-seeded rice yield prediction using UAV-derived features acquired during the reproductive phase","authors":"Guodong Yang, Yaxing Li, Shen Yuan, Changzai Zhou, Hongshun Xiang, Zhenqing Zhao, Qiaorong Wei, Qingshan Chen, Shaobing Peng, Le Xu","doi":"10.1007/s11119-023-10103-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pre-harvest yield prediction of direct-seeded rice is critical for guiding crop interventions and food security assessment in precision agriculture. Technology advances in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based remote sensing has provided an unprecedented opportunity to efficiently retrieve crop growth parameters instead of labor-intensive ground measurements. This study is aiming to evaluate the feasibility of fusing multi-temporal UAV-derived features collected at critical phenological stages in forecasting direct-seeded rice yield across different cultivars and nitrogen (N) management. The results showed that RGB sensor-derived canopy volume, canopy coverage, and spectral features including RBRI, WI etc., were identified to be most sensitive to the differences in aboveground biomass and grain yield. Heading stage was the suitable time for estimating yield performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75) for mono-temporal UAV observation. By contrast, multi-temporal features fusion could remarkably enhance the yield prediction accuracy. Moreover, the yield prediction accuracy can be further improved by integrating UAV features collected at panicle initiation and heading stages (i.e., rice reproductive phase) compared to multi-temporal features fusion (R<sup>2</sup> increased from 0.82 to 0.85 and RMSE decreased from 35.1 to 31.5 g m<sup>−2</sup>). This can be attributed to the fact that the biomass accumulation during the reproductive phase was closely associated to the total spikelets and final yield. By using this proposed approach, the predicted yield showed a good spatial consistency with the measured yield across different cultivars and N management, and yield prediction error in the most of the plots (114 of 128 plots) was less than 45 g m<sup>−2</sup>. In summary, this study highlights that the reproductive phase is the optimal time window for UAV observing, which provides an effective method for accurate pre-harvest yield prediction of direct-seeded rice in precision agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-023-10103-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pre-harvest yield prediction of direct-seeded rice is critical for guiding crop interventions and food security assessment in precision agriculture. Technology advances in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based remote sensing has provided an unprecedented opportunity to efficiently retrieve crop growth parameters instead of labor-intensive ground measurements. This study is aiming to evaluate the feasibility of fusing multi-temporal UAV-derived features collected at critical phenological stages in forecasting direct-seeded rice yield across different cultivars and nitrogen (N) management. The results showed that RGB sensor-derived canopy volume, canopy coverage, and spectral features including RBRI, WI etc., were identified to be most sensitive to the differences in aboveground biomass and grain yield. Heading stage was the suitable time for estimating yield performance (R2 = 0.75) for mono-temporal UAV observation. By contrast, multi-temporal features fusion could remarkably enhance the yield prediction accuracy. Moreover, the yield prediction accuracy can be further improved by integrating UAV features collected at panicle initiation and heading stages (i.e., rice reproductive phase) compared to multi-temporal features fusion (R2 increased from 0.82 to 0.85 and RMSE decreased from 35.1 to 31.5 g m−2). This can be attributed to the fact that the biomass accumulation during the reproductive phase was closely associated to the total spikelets and final yield. By using this proposed approach, the predicted yield showed a good spatial consistency with the measured yield across different cultivars and N management, and yield prediction error in the most of the plots (114 of 128 plots) was less than 45 g m−2. In summary, this study highlights that the reproductive phase is the optimal time window for UAV observing, which provides an effective method for accurate pre-harvest yield prediction of direct-seeded rice in precision agriculture.
期刊介绍:
Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming.
There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to:
Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc.
Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc.
Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc.
Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc.
Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc.
Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.