Skill use mediates the within-person effect of the alliance on session-to-session changes in anxiety and depression in the Unified Protocol

Martina Fruhbauerova , Douglas R. Terrill , Stephen A. Semcho , Nicole E. Stumpp , Jesse P. McCann , Shannon Sauer-Zavala , Matthew W. Southward
{"title":"Skill use mediates the within-person effect of the alliance on session-to-session changes in anxiety and depression in the Unified Protocol","authors":"Martina Fruhbauerova ,&nbsp;Douglas R. Terrill ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Semcho ,&nbsp;Nicole E. Stumpp ,&nbsp;Jesse P. McCann ,&nbsp;Shannon Sauer-Zavala ,&nbsp;Matthew W. Southward","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2023.100043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Both the therapeutic alliance and the specific skills taught in treatment are thought to contribute to change in cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), but it is unclear if or how these processes influence each other and outcomes in treatment. We tested the hypothesis that the degree to which patients used CBT skills would mediate the relation between the alliance and session-to-session changes in anxiety and depression.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Adult participants (<em>N</em> = 70; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 33.74, 67% female, 70% White) with emotional disorders were randomized to receive 6 or 12 sessions of the Unified Protocol. Before each session, participants reported anxiety and depression severity and past-week skillfulness. After each session, participants rated the strength of the alliance. We tested whether greater within-person skillfulness mediated the relation between within-person alliance strength and session-to-session changes in anxiety and depression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Skillfulness significantly mediated the effect of the alliance on session-to-session changes in anxiety, <em>ab</em> = –.02, <em>p</em> = .04, and depression, <em>ab</em> = –.02, <em>p</em> = .02, such that a stronger alliance predicted greater next-session skillfulness, which predicted session-to-session decreases in anxiety and depression. When alliance subscales were examined separately, the strongest effect was observed for agreement on therapy tasks.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Improvements in the alliance may facilitate skill use and indirectly predict reductions in anxiety and depression through skill use in CBT. We encourage research on how to enhance both the alliance and skillfulness in CBT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004423000433/pdfft?md5=24d5de372d1c8ca56d5f6ec8e836dc60&pid=1-s2.0-S2950004423000433-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004423000433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Both the therapeutic alliance and the specific skills taught in treatment are thought to contribute to change in cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), but it is unclear if or how these processes influence each other and outcomes in treatment. We tested the hypothesis that the degree to which patients used CBT skills would mediate the relation between the alliance and session-to-session changes in anxiety and depression.

Method

Adult participants (N = 70; Mage = 33.74, 67% female, 70% White) with emotional disorders were randomized to receive 6 or 12 sessions of the Unified Protocol. Before each session, participants reported anxiety and depression severity and past-week skillfulness. After each session, participants rated the strength of the alliance. We tested whether greater within-person skillfulness mediated the relation between within-person alliance strength and session-to-session changes in anxiety and depression.

Results

Skillfulness significantly mediated the effect of the alliance on session-to-session changes in anxiety, ab = –.02, p = .04, and depression, ab = –.02, p = .02, such that a stronger alliance predicted greater next-session skillfulness, which predicted session-to-session decreases in anxiety and depression. When alliance subscales were examined separately, the strongest effect was observed for agreement on therapy tasks.

Conclusions

Improvements in the alliance may facilitate skill use and indirectly predict reductions in anxiety and depression through skill use in CBT. We encourage research on how to enhance both the alliance and skillfulness in CBT.

在统一协议中,技能的使用在人与人之间对焦虑和抑郁的会话到会话之间变化的联盟效应起着中介作用
目的治疗联盟和治疗中教授的特定技能被认为有助于认知行为疗法(CBT)的改变,但这些过程是否或如何相互影响以及治疗结果尚不清楚。我们测试了这样一个假设,即患者使用 CBT 技能的程度将介导联盟与焦虑和抑郁的会话变化之间的关系。方法:患有情绪障碍的成人参与者(N = 70;年龄 = 33.74,67% 为女性,70% 为白人)被随机分配接受 6 或 12 个疗程的统一方案治疗。每次治疗前,参与者报告焦虑和抑郁的严重程度以及过去一周的技能水平。每次疗程结束后,参与者对联盟的强度进行评分。我们测试了更高的人内技能是否会介导人内联盟强度与焦虑和抑郁从疗程到疗程的变化之间的关系。结果技能显著介导了联盟对焦虑(ab = -.02,p = .04)和抑郁(ab = -.02,p = .02)从疗程到疗程变化的影响,即更强的联盟预示着更高的下一疗程技能,而更高的技能预示着焦虑和抑郁从疗程到疗程的下降。当对联盟的子量表进行单独研究时,观察到的最强效应是治疗任务的一致性。结论联盟的改善可能会促进技能的使用,并通过 CBT 中技能的使用间接预测焦虑和抑郁的减少。我们鼓励对如何在 CBT 中增强联盟和技能进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信