Toothbrushing effects on the surface roughness and cement volume loss of bonded enamel-ceramic interface.

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2023-12-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202305459
Luísa de Almeida Vieira Marins, Vitaliano Gomes Araújo-Neto, Beatriz Ometto Sahadi, Carolina Bosso André, Marcelo Giannini
{"title":"Toothbrushing effects on the surface roughness and cement volume loss of bonded enamel-ceramic interface.","authors":"Luísa de Almeida Vieira Marins, Vitaliano Gomes Araújo-Neto, Beatriz Ometto Sahadi, Carolina Bosso André, Marcelo Giannini","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202305459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the effect of toothbrushing on enamel-cementing material-ceramic bonded interfaces, using different cementing materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty enamel and thirty ceramic blocks were bonded with cementing materials to produce the samples that were bonded with three types of cementing materials: 1- RelyX Ultimate resin cement (REXU), 2- RelyX Unicem 2 self-adhesive resin cement (REU2) and 3- heated Z100 restorative composite (60°C). Bonded interfaces of the samples were toothbrushed and the surfaces of the 3 cementing materials were evaluated for roughness (RG, in µm), roughness profile (RP, in µm), and volume loss (VL, in µm3) (baseline and after 20,000 and 60,000 toothbrushing cycles). Data were evaluated by Generalized Linear Analysis (two factors: \"material\" and \"toothbrushing cycle\") and Bonferroni test (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>REXU and Z100 exhibited lower RG than that presented by REU2, except after 60,000 toothbrushing cycles when only Z100 differed from REU2. The increase in toothbrushing cycles increased the RG and RP for all materials. REU2 also showed higher RP than those showed by REXU and Z100 when it was analyzed regarding the enamel. The VL of Z100 was the lowest with 20,000 toothbrushing cycles, regarding the enamel and ceramic. For 60,000 cycles, REXU showed the lowest VL regarding the ceramic, and REU2 had the highest VL regarding the enamel and ceramic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In general, REXU and Z100 showed the best results regarding the evaluations performed and the REU2 exhibited the highest RG, RP, and VL.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"34 5","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10759952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of toothbrushing on enamel-cementing material-ceramic bonded interfaces, using different cementing materials.

Materials and methods: Thirty enamel and thirty ceramic blocks were bonded with cementing materials to produce the samples that were bonded with three types of cementing materials: 1- RelyX Ultimate resin cement (REXU), 2- RelyX Unicem 2 self-adhesive resin cement (REU2) and 3- heated Z100 restorative composite (60°C). Bonded interfaces of the samples were toothbrushed and the surfaces of the 3 cementing materials were evaluated for roughness (RG, in µm), roughness profile (RP, in µm), and volume loss (VL, in µm3) (baseline and after 20,000 and 60,000 toothbrushing cycles). Data were evaluated by Generalized Linear Analysis (two factors: "material" and "toothbrushing cycle") and Bonferroni test (α=0.05).

Results: REXU and Z100 exhibited lower RG than that presented by REU2, except after 60,000 toothbrushing cycles when only Z100 differed from REU2. The increase in toothbrushing cycles increased the RG and RP for all materials. REU2 also showed higher RP than those showed by REXU and Z100 when it was analyzed regarding the enamel. The VL of Z100 was the lowest with 20,000 toothbrushing cycles, regarding the enamel and ceramic. For 60,000 cycles, REXU showed the lowest VL regarding the ceramic, and REU2 had the highest VL regarding the enamel and ceramic.

Conclusion: In general, REXU and Z100 showed the best results regarding the evaluations performed and the REU2 exhibited the highest RG, RP, and VL.

刷牙对粘结釉瓷界面表面粗糙度和粘结剂体积损失的影响
本研究评估了刷牙对使用不同粘结材料的珐琅质-粘结材料-陶瓷粘结界面的影响:用粘结材料粘结 30 个珐琅和 30 个陶瓷块,制作出用三种粘结材料粘结的样品:1- RelyX Ultimate树脂粘结剂(REXU),2- RelyX Unicem 2自粘树脂粘结剂(REU2)和3-加热的Z100修复复合材料(60°C)。对样品的粘接界面进行刷牙,并对 3 种粘接材料的表面粗糙度(RG,单位为 µm)、粗糙度轮廓(RP,单位为 µm)和体积损失(VL,单位为 µm3)(基线以及 20,000 和 60,000 次刷牙后)进行评估。数据采用广义线性分析法(两个因子:"材料 "和 "刷牙周期")和 Bonferroni 检验法(α=0.05)进行评估:REXU和Z100的RG值低于REU2,但在刷牙60,000次后,只有Z100与REU2不同。刷牙次数的增加提高了所有材料的 RG 和 RP。对珐琅质进行分析时,REU2 的 RP 也高于 REXU 和 Z100。就珐琅质和陶瓷而言,Z100 的 VL 在刷牙 20,000 次时最低。在刷牙 60,000 次时,REXU 在陶瓷方面的 VL 最低,而 REU2 在珐琅质和陶瓷方面的 VL 最高:总的来说,REXU 和 Z100 的评估结果最好,REU2 的 RG、RP 和 VL 最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信