Red and green defocus curves and duochrome test in different age groups

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Riccardo Rolandi , Fabrizio Zeri , Alessandro Duse , Giulia Carlotta Rizzo , Erika Ponzini , Silvia Tavazzi
{"title":"Red and green defocus curves and duochrome test in different age groups","authors":"Riccardo Rolandi ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Zeri ,&nbsp;Alessandro Duse ,&nbsp;Giulia Carlotta Rizzo ,&nbsp;Erika Ponzini ,&nbsp;Silvia Tavazzi","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the eye defocus curves (DCs) obtained with stimuli on red, green, and white backgrounds and to investigate the applicability of the duochrome test (DT) in different age groups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>12 elderly (ELD: 59.3 ± 3.9 years) and 8 young (YG: 22.1 ± 1.1 years) subjects were recruited. An optometric assessment with the DT was carried out to obtain the subjective refraction at distance. DCs at distance on green, white, and red backgrounds were measured and the following parameters were deduced: dioptric difference between red-green, green-white, red-white focal positions (minima of the DCs), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and widths of the DCs for red, green, and white.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The DC difference between the green-white focal positions (mean ± standard deviation) was -0.12±0.17 diopters (D) (ELD, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.012) and -0.11±0.12 D (YG, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.039), while the red-white difference was not statistically significant. The DC red-green difference was 0.20±0.16 D (ELD, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.002) and 0.18±0.18 D (YG, <em>p</em> = 0.008). The ELD BCVA with green background was significantly worse than BCVA with red (<em>p</em> = 0.007) and white (<em>p</em> = 0.007). The mean value of the DC's width in ELD for green (1.01±0.36 D) was higher than for red (0.77±0.21 D) and for white (0.84±0.35 D), but with no statistical significance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Both age groups showed a slight focusing preference for red when using white light. Moreover, ELD showed a worse BCVA with a green compared to a red background. Despite these results deduced by DC analyses, these aspects do not compromise the possibility of using the DT in clinical practice both in the young and in the elderly. Furthermore, the difference of about 0.20 D between red-green DC in both groups confirms the clinical appropriateness of the widespread use of 0.25 D step as the standard minimum difference in power between correcting lenses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000456/pdfft?md5=11b7b767f848d8e89bdf02cd0799c905&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000456-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the eye defocus curves (DCs) obtained with stimuli on red, green, and white backgrounds and to investigate the applicability of the duochrome test (DT) in different age groups.

Methods

12 elderly (ELD: 59.3 ± 3.9 years) and 8 young (YG: 22.1 ± 1.1 years) subjects were recruited. An optometric assessment with the DT was carried out to obtain the subjective refraction at distance. DCs at distance on green, white, and red backgrounds were measured and the following parameters were deduced: dioptric difference between red-green, green-white, red-white focal positions (minima of the DCs), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and widths of the DCs for red, green, and white.

Results

The DC difference between the green-white focal positions (mean ± standard deviation) was -0.12±0.17 diopters (D) (ELD, p = 0.012) and -0.11±0.12 D (YG, p = 0.039), while the red-white difference was not statistically significant. The DC red-green difference was 0.20±0.16 D (ELD, p = 0.002) and 0.18±0.18 D (YG, p = 0.008). The ELD BCVA with green background was significantly worse than BCVA with red (p = 0.007) and white (p = 0.007). The mean value of the DC's width in ELD for green (1.01±0.36 D) was higher than for red (0.77±0.21 D) and for white (0.84±0.35 D), but with no statistical significance.

Conclusion

Both age groups showed a slight focusing preference for red when using white light. Moreover, ELD showed a worse BCVA with a green compared to a red background. Despite these results deduced by DC analyses, these aspects do not compromise the possibility of using the DT in clinical practice both in the young and in the elderly. Furthermore, the difference of about 0.20 D between red-green DC in both groups confirms the clinical appropriateness of the widespread use of 0.25 D step as the standard minimum difference in power between correcting lenses.

不同年龄组的红绿散焦曲线和双色测试
目的:比较在红色、绿色和白色背景刺激下获得的眼睛离焦曲线(DC),并研究双色测试(DT)在不同年龄组中的适用性。方法:招募 12 名老年受试者(ELD:59.3 ± 3.9 岁)和 8 名年轻受试者(YG:22.1 ± 1.1 岁)。使用 DT 进行验光评估,以获得远处的主观屈光度。测量了绿色、白色和红色背景下的远距离直流电,并推导出以下参数:红绿、绿白、红白焦点位置之间的屈光度差(直流电的最小值)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)以及红、绿、白的直流电宽度:绿白焦点位置之间的直流差(平均值±标准偏差)分别为-0.12±0.17屈光度(D)(ELD,p = 0.012)和-0.11±0.12屈光度(YG,p = 0.039),而红白之间的直流差无统计学意义。直流红绿差为 0.20±0.16 D(ELD,p = 0.002)和 0.18±0.18 D(YG,p = 0.008)。ELD BCVA 的绿色背景明显差于 BCVA 的红色背景(p = 0.007)和白色背景(p = 0.007)。在 ELD 中,绿色的 DC 宽度平均值(1.01±0.36 D)高于红色(0.77±0.21 D)和白色(0.84±0.35 D),但没有统计学意义:结论:两个年龄组的人在使用白光时都对红光有轻微的聚焦偏好。此外,与红色背景相比, ELD 在绿色背景下的 BCVA 更差。尽管直流电分析得出了这些结果,但这些方面并不影响在临床实践中对年轻人和老年人使用 DT 的可能性。此外,两组红绿DC之间约0.20 D的差异证实了临床上广泛使用0.25 D作为矫正镜片之间最小功率差异标准的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信