The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of hand crush injuries.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Wound Repair and Regeneration Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1111/wrr.13134
Dun-Hao Chang, Chi-Ying Hsieh, Che-Wei Chang, Hsu-Hui Wang, Hou-Tai Chang
{"title":"The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of hand crush injuries.","authors":"Dun-Hao Chang, Chi-Ying Hsieh, Che-Wei Chang, Hsu-Hui Wang, Hou-Tai Chang","doi":"10.1111/wrr.13134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been used as an adjuvant treatment for crush injury because it can improve tissue hypoxia and stimulate wound healing. However, the actual role of HBOT in crush hand injury is still unknown. This study is to assess the efficacy of HBOT for crush hand patients, as well as the impact of HBOT initiation timing. Between 2018 and 2021, 72 patients with crush hand injury were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into the HBOT and control group, and each group had 36 patients. The average session of HBOT was 18.2 (5-32 sessions) per patient, and no patient had a complication related to the treatment. The two groups had similar demographics, but HBOT group had larger injured area (73.6 ± 51.0 vs. 48.2 ± 45.5 cm<sup>2</sup> , p = 0.03). To better control the confounding factors, we performed the subgroup analysis with cut-off injured area of 50 cm<sup>2</sup> . In the patients with smaller injured area (≦50 cm<sup>2</sup> ), the HBOT group had shorter wound healing time (29.9 ± 12.9 vs. 41.0 ± 18.9 days, p = 0.03). The early HBOT group (first session ≤72 h post-operatively) had shorter hospital stay (8.1 ± 6.4 vs. 15.5 ± 11.4 days, p = 0.04), faster wound healing (28.7 ± 17.8 vs. 41.1 ± 18.1 days, p = 0.08) and less operations (1.54 ± 0.78 vs. 2.41 ± 1.62, p = 0.06) although the latter two didn't achieve statistical significance. HBOT is safe and effective in improving wound healing of hand crush injury. Early intervention of HBOT may be more beneficial. Future research is required to provide more evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":" ","pages":"146-154"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been used as an adjuvant treatment for crush injury because it can improve tissue hypoxia and stimulate wound healing. However, the actual role of HBOT in crush hand injury is still unknown. This study is to assess the efficacy of HBOT for crush hand patients, as well as the impact of HBOT initiation timing. Between 2018 and 2021, 72 patients with crush hand injury were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into the HBOT and control group, and each group had 36 patients. The average session of HBOT was 18.2 (5-32 sessions) per patient, and no patient had a complication related to the treatment. The two groups had similar demographics, but HBOT group had larger injured area (73.6 ± 51.0 vs. 48.2 ± 45.5 cm2 , p = 0.03). To better control the confounding factors, we performed the subgroup analysis with cut-off injured area of 50 cm2 . In the patients with smaller injured area (≦50 cm2 ), the HBOT group had shorter wound healing time (29.9 ± 12.9 vs. 41.0 ± 18.9 days, p = 0.03). The early HBOT group (first session ≤72 h post-operatively) had shorter hospital stay (8.1 ± 6.4 vs. 15.5 ± 11.4 days, p = 0.04), faster wound healing (28.7 ± 17.8 vs. 41.1 ± 18.1 days, p = 0.08) and less operations (1.54 ± 0.78 vs. 2.41 ± 1.62, p = 0.06) although the latter two didn't achieve statistical significance. HBOT is safe and effective in improving wound healing of hand crush injury. Early intervention of HBOT may be more beneficial. Future research is required to provide more evidence.

使用高压氧疗法治疗手部挤压伤。
高压氧疗法(HBOT)可改善组织缺氧状况并促进伤口愈合,因此一直被用作挤压伤的辅助治疗手段。然而,高压氧疗法在手挤压伤中的实际作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估 HBOT 对手部挤压伤患者的疗效,以及 HBOT 启动时机的影响。在 2018 年至 2021 年期间,对 72 例手部挤压伤患者进行了回顾性研究。患者被分为 HBOT 组和对照组,每组 36 人。每位患者平均接受 18.2 次(5-32 次)HBOT 治疗,没有患者出现与治疗相关的并发症。两组的人口统计学特征相似,但 HBOT 组的受伤面积更大(73.6±51.0 VS 48.2±45.5 cm2,P= 0.03)。为了更好地控制混杂因素,我们进行了亚组分析,截断损伤面积为 50 平方厘米。在受伤面积较小(≦50 平方厘米)的患者中,HBOT 组的伤口愈合时间较短(29.9 ± 12.9 天 VS 41.0 ± 18.9 天,P=0.03)。早期 HBOT 组(第一次治疗时间≦术后 72 小时)的住院时间更短(8.1±6.4 天 VS 15.5±11.4天,P=0.04),伤口愈合更快(28.7±17.8 天 VS 41.1±18.1天,P=0.08),手术更少(1.54±0.78 VS 2.41±1.62,P=0.06),但后两者均未达到统计学意义。HBOT 能安全有效地改善手部挤压伤的伤口愈合。早期干预 HBOT 可能更有益。未来的研究需要提供更多证据。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Wound Repair and Regeneration 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others. Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信