Factors associated with decision regret after bariatric surgery

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1111/cob.12633
Phillip J. Dijkhorst, Leontien M. G. Nijland, Ruben N. van Veen, Steve M. M. de Castro
{"title":"Factors associated with decision regret after bariatric surgery","authors":"Phillip J. Dijkhorst,&nbsp;Leontien M. G. Nijland,&nbsp;Ruben N. van Veen,&nbsp;Steve M. M. de Castro","doi":"10.1111/cob.12633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>It is assumed that the individuals who undergo bariatric surgery will experience significant improvements in their health and overall well-being. However, it is yet to be examined whether these individuals may also experience subsequent decision regret. The level of regret regarding the choice to undergo bariatric surgery was assessed 1 year after bariatric surgery using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Associations of regret with patient characteristics, complications, weight loss and quality of life (BODY-Q) were investigated using linear regression analyses. In total, 115 patients completed the DRS (92% underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 8% underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG)). Two out of 115 patients indicated absolute regret about their decision to undergo bariatric surgery because of insufficient weight loss and complications. The median decision regret score was zero (range 0–80). Most patients experienced no decision regret (50.4%), followed by mild regret (34.8%) and moderate to strong regret (14.8%). Higher levels of regret were associated with having osteo-articular disorders, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or a history of psychiatric disorders at baseline. Patients with mild regret demonstrated significantly more weight loss and better psychological function. Major surgical complications were not associated with increased decision regret. Only two out of 115 patients (1.7%) indicated absolute regret about their decision to undergo bariatric surgery, and 15% reported moderate-to-strong regret according to the results of the DRS. These findings should be considered when providing pre-operative counselling and could assist patients in their decision-making process.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is assumed that the individuals who undergo bariatric surgery will experience significant improvements in their health and overall well-being. However, it is yet to be examined whether these individuals may also experience subsequent decision regret. The level of regret regarding the choice to undergo bariatric surgery was assessed 1 year after bariatric surgery using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Associations of regret with patient characteristics, complications, weight loss and quality of life (BODY-Q) were investigated using linear regression analyses. In total, 115 patients completed the DRS (92% underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 8% underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG)). Two out of 115 patients indicated absolute regret about their decision to undergo bariatric surgery because of insufficient weight loss and complications. The median decision regret score was zero (range 0–80). Most patients experienced no decision regret (50.4%), followed by mild regret (34.8%) and moderate to strong regret (14.8%). Higher levels of regret were associated with having osteo-articular disorders, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or a history of psychiatric disorders at baseline. Patients with mild regret demonstrated significantly more weight loss and better psychological function. Major surgical complications were not associated with increased decision regret. Only two out of 115 patients (1.7%) indicated absolute regret about their decision to undergo bariatric surgery, and 15% reported moderate-to-strong regret according to the results of the DRS. These findings should be considered when providing pre-operative counselling and could assist patients in their decision-making process.

减肥手术后决定后悔的相关因素。
人们假定,接受减肥手术的人会在健康和整体福祉方面得到显著改善。然而,这些人是否也会在随后的决定中感到后悔,还有待研究。我们使用决策后悔量表(DRS)对减肥手术 1 年后患者对选择减肥手术的后悔程度进行了评估。通过线性回归分析研究了后悔与患者特征、并发症、体重减轻和生活质量(BODY-Q)之间的关系。共有 115 名患者完成了 DRS(92% 接受了 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术,8% 接受了袖带胃切除术(SG))。115 名患者中,有两名患者表示因体重减轻不足和并发症而对接受减肥手术的决定感到绝对后悔。决定后悔评分的中位数为零(范围为 0-80)。大多数患者没有后悔的决定(50.4%),其次是轻度后悔(34.8%)和中度至强烈后悔(14.8%)。较高程度的后悔与基线时患有骨关节疾病、胃食管反流病或精神病史有关。轻度后悔的患者体重明显减轻,心理功能也有所改善。主要手术并发症与决定后悔程度的增加无关。根据 DRS 的结果,115 名患者中只有 2 人(1.7%)对接受减肥手术的决定表示绝对后悔,15% 的患者表示中度至强烈后悔。在提供术前咨询时应考虑到这些发现,它们可以帮助患者做出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信