Methods for prediction of morphophysiological variables of Brachiaria decumbens grass

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jefte A. A. Conrado, Marcos N. Lopes, Roberto C. F. F. Pompeu, Magno J. D. Cândido
{"title":"Methods for prediction of morphophysiological variables of Brachiaria decumbens grass","authors":"Jefte A. A. Conrado,&nbsp;Marcos N. Lopes,&nbsp;Roberto C. F. F. Pompeu,&nbsp;Magno J. D. Cândido","doi":"10.1111/grs.12418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate different methodologies used in the field in order to find the one that could most effectively relate to the morphophysiological condition of <i>Brachiaria decumbens</i> cv. Basilisk (syn. <i>Urochloa decumbens</i> cv. Basilisk Stapf R.D. Webster). Two light interception frequencies (LI, 85% and 95%) and two defoliation intensities were adopted as targets for the residual leaf area index (RLAI 1.3 and 1.8). The treatments consisted of evaluating different methods of measuring the canopy height (CH) through its ability to correlate with the morphophysiological variables of species <i>B. decumbens</i> cv. Basilisk. High correlations between the methods CH, compressed height (CHe), weighted height 1 (WH<sub>1</sub>) and weighted height 8 (WH<sub>8</sub>) were observed mainly with the variables total forage biomass (TFB) and leaf area index (LAI) in both residual and pre-grazing conditions. The path analysis showed degrees of multicollinearity, which determined the use of the “k” constants in order to correct the distortions of the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix X'X. Path analysis provided direct cause/effect indexes on TFB using LAI = 0.1435, photosynthesis (A) = −0.1061, CH = 0.1616, CHe = 0.0913, WH<sub>1</sub> = 0.1386 and WH<sub>8</sub> = 0.0575; on LAI using CH = 0.2404, CHe = 0.2164, WH<sub>1</sub> = 0.2307 and WH<sub>8</sub> = 0.2183; and on photosynthesis rate (A) using LAI = 0.2895, CH = 0.0203, CHe = −0.1170, WH<sub>1</sub> = 0.0352 and WH<sub>8</sub> = 0.0937. Similarity was observed between intercepts and slope coefficients for TFB prediction using CH, CHe, WH<sub>1</sub> and WH<sub>8</sub>, providing mean values of 1069.57 and 204.06, respectively. Methods CH and WH<sub>1</sub> presented a significant correlation with most morphophysiological variables and can be used to quantify TFB and LAI, while CH and WH<sub>8</sub> can be used only for TFB.</p>","PeriodicalId":56078,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Science","volume":"70 2","pages":"51-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.12418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate different methodologies used in the field in order to find the one that could most effectively relate to the morphophysiological condition of Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk (syn. Urochloa decumbens cv. Basilisk Stapf R.D. Webster). Two light interception frequencies (LI, 85% and 95%) and two defoliation intensities were adopted as targets for the residual leaf area index (RLAI 1.3 and 1.8). The treatments consisted of evaluating different methods of measuring the canopy height (CH) through its ability to correlate with the morphophysiological variables of species B. decumbens cv. Basilisk. High correlations between the methods CH, compressed height (CHe), weighted height 1 (WH1) and weighted height 8 (WH8) were observed mainly with the variables total forage biomass (TFB) and leaf area index (LAI) in both residual and pre-grazing conditions. The path analysis showed degrees of multicollinearity, which determined the use of the “k” constants in order to correct the distortions of the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix X'X. Path analysis provided direct cause/effect indexes on TFB using LAI = 0.1435, photosynthesis (A) = −0.1061, CH = 0.1616, CHe = 0.0913, WH1 = 0.1386 and WH8 = 0.0575; on LAI using CH = 0.2404, CHe = 0.2164, WH1 = 0.2307 and WH8 = 0.2183; and on photosynthesis rate (A) using LAI = 0.2895, CH = 0.0203, CHe = −0.1170, WH1 = 0.0352 and WH8 = 0.0937. Similarity was observed between intercepts and slope coefficients for TFB prediction using CH, CHe, WH1 and WH8, providing mean values of 1069.57 and 204.06, respectively. Methods CH and WH1 presented a significant correlation with most morphophysiological variables and can be used to quantify TFB and LAI, while CH and WH8 can be used only for TFB.

预测十胜草形态生理变量的方法
本研究的目的是评估田间使用的不同方法,以找到最有效地反映巴西苣苔 (Urochloa decumbens cv. Basilisk Stapf R.D. Webster) 形态生理状况的方法。残留叶面积指数(RLAI 1.3 和 1.8)的目标是两种截光频率(LI,85% 和 95%)和两种落叶强度。处理包括评估不同的冠层高度(CH)测量方法,看其是否能与 B. decumbens cv. Basilisk 树种的形态生理变量相关联。在残留和放牧前两种条件下,CH、压缩高度(CHe)、加权高度 1(WH1)和加权高度 8(WH8)等方法主要与总牧草生物量(TFB)和叶面积指数(LAI)变量之间存在高度相关性。路径分析显示出一定程度的多重共线性,这决定了使用 "k "常数来校正相关矩阵 X'X 对角线元素的扭曲。路径分析提供了对 TFB 的直接因果关系指数:LAI = 0.1435,光合作用(A)= -0.1061,CH = 0.1616,CHe = 0.0913,WH1 = 0.1386 和 WH8 = 0.0575;对 LAI 的直接因果关系指数:CH = 0.2404、CHe = 0.2164、WH1 = 0.2307 和 WH8 = 0.2183;光合作用速率(A)方面,LAI = 0.2895、CH = 0.0203、CHe = -0.1170、WH1 = 0.0352 和 WH8 = 0.0937。使用 CH、CHe、WH1 和 WH8 预测 TFB 的截距和斜率系数之间具有相似性,平均值分别为 1069.57 和 204.06。方法 CH 和 WH1 与大多数形态生理变量具有显著相关性,可用于量化 TFB 和 LAI,而 CH 和 WH8 仅可用于 TFB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grassland Science
Grassland Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Grassland Science is the official English language journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science. It publishes original research papers, review articles and short reports in all aspects of grassland science, with an aim of presenting and sharing knowledge, ideas and philosophies on better management and use of grasslands, forage crops and turf plants for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes across the world. Contributions from anyone, non-members as well as members, are welcome in any of the following fields: grassland environment, landscape, ecology and systems analysis; pasture and lawn establishment, management and cultivation; grassland utilization, animal management, behavior, nutrition and production; forage conservation, processing, storage, utilization and nutritive value; physiology, morphology, pathology and entomology of plants; breeding and genetics; physicochemical property of soil, soil animals and microorganisms and plant nutrition; economics in grassland systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信