Refractive Predictability between Standard and Total Keratometry during the Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery with Monofocal Intraocular Lens with Enhanced Intermediate Function.

Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-19 DOI:10.3341/kjo.2023.0039
Hyunah Lim, Joon Hyuck Jang, Sanghyu Nam, Koeun Lee, Jae Yong Kim, Hungwon Tchah, Hun Lee
{"title":"Refractive Predictability between Standard and Total Keratometry during the Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery with Monofocal Intraocular Lens with Enhanced Intermediate Function.","authors":"Hyunah Lim, Joon Hyuck Jang, Sanghyu Nam, Koeun Lee, Jae Yong Kim, Hungwon Tchah, Hun Lee","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2023.0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to compare the accuracy of the intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula using the standard keratometry (K) and total K (TK) during the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with a monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function using currently used formulas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 125 eyes from 125 patients who had undergone FLACS with implantation of monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function was conducted. The predicted refractive power was calculated using an optical biometer (IOLmaster 700) according to the K and TK in the Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Haigis, and Holladay 2 formulas. Absolute prediction error (APE) obtained from the actual postoperative refractive outcomes and the refractive error predicted in each formula was compared one month after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean APE ranged between 0.29 and 0.39 diopters (D) regardless of the calculation formula and the method of measuring corneal curvature. Significant differences were observed in the APE from the four formulas and the two keratometric measurements (p = 0.014). In a total of 125 eyes from 125 patients, the mean APE was lowest with the Barrett Universal II formula. Across all formulas, both the mean APE and the median APE tended to be lower for K than for TK, although there was no significant difference. Approximately 70% to 80% of the patients were included within 0.5 D of the refractive error across all formulas. The percentage of eyes within 0.5 D of APE outcomes was not statistically different between the K and TK data when using each formula.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Keratometric measurements considering the poster corneal curvature did not show any additional advantages when implanting the monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function during the FLACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":101356,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10869425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2023.0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to compare the accuracy of the intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula using the standard keratometry (K) and total K (TK) during the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with a monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function using currently used formulas.

Methods: A retrospective review of 125 eyes from 125 patients who had undergone FLACS with implantation of monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function was conducted. The predicted refractive power was calculated using an optical biometer (IOLmaster 700) according to the K and TK in the Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Haigis, and Holladay 2 formulas. Absolute prediction error (APE) obtained from the actual postoperative refractive outcomes and the refractive error predicted in each formula was compared one month after surgery.

Results: Mean APE ranged between 0.29 and 0.39 diopters (D) regardless of the calculation formula and the method of measuring corneal curvature. Significant differences were observed in the APE from the four formulas and the two keratometric measurements (p = 0.014). In a total of 125 eyes from 125 patients, the mean APE was lowest with the Barrett Universal II formula. Across all formulas, both the mean APE and the median APE tended to be lower for K than for TK, although there was no significant difference. Approximately 70% to 80% of the patients were included within 0.5 D of the refractive error across all formulas. The percentage of eyes within 0.5 D of APE outcomes was not statistically different between the K and TK data when using each formula.

Conclusions: Keratometric measurements considering the poster corneal curvature did not show any additional advantages when implanting the monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function during the FLACS.

使用具有增强中间功能的单焦点眼内透镜进行 FLACS 时,标准角膜屈光度与全角膜屈光度之间的屈光预测性。
目的:我们旨在比较在飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)中使用具有增强中间功能的单焦点人工晶体(IOLs)时,使用标准角膜测量法(K)和全角膜测量法(TK)计算人工晶体计算公式的准确性:对 125 名接受 FLACS 并植入具有增强中间功能的单焦点人工晶体的患者的 125 只眼睛进行了回顾性研究。根据巴雷特通用 II、SRK/T、Haigis 和 Holladay 2 公式中的 K 和 TK,使用光学生物计(IOLmaster 700)计算预测屈光力。将术后一个月的实际屈光结果与每种公式预测的屈光误差进行比较,得出绝对预测误差(APE):无论采用哪种计算公式和角膜曲率测量方法,平均绝对预测误差都在 0.29 至 0.39 个屈光度(D)之间。四种计算公式和两种角膜曲率测量方法得出的 APE 存在显著差异(P = 0.014)。在 125 名患者的 125 只眼睛中,巴雷特 K 通用 II 配方的平均 APE 最低。在所有配方中,K 的平均 APE 和 APE 中位数往往低于 TK,但差异并不显著。在所有公式中,约有 70-80% 的患者屈光不正在 0.5D 以内。在使用 K 和 TK 数据时,APE 结果在 0.5D 以内的眼睛比例在统计学上没有差异:考虑到角膜后曲率的角膜测量结果显示,在FLACS期间植入具有增强中间功能的单焦点人工晶体没有任何额外优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信