Analysis of a telephone hotline for palliative care patients at home and their families.

Maria de Lurdes da Costa Martins, Sara Pinto
{"title":"Analysis of a telephone hotline for palliative care patients at home and their families.","authors":"Maria de Lurdes da Costa Martins, Sara Pinto","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2023.29.12.571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To describe the use of a telephone consultation (TC) hotline for palliative care (PC) patients and their families at home provided by a PC service, during the COVID-19 lockdown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational and cross-sectional study of a TC hotline performed by a PC service from 1 January to 31 December 2020. Data was collected through a record sheet completed during the call. Descriptive analyses were performed using the SPSS software (V.21 for Windows).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 494 calls were retrieved (n=187 patients; 6500 minutes recorded). Compared to 2019, incoming calls increased 33.8%. Most callers were a family member (n=419) or a community health worker (n= 60). The peak of calls was registered in April (13.5%), May (13.2%) and October (15.0%). Main problems included uncontrolled symptoms (81.9%), need for medication (8.6%), information (4.8%) and consultation rescheduling (2.6%). In 81.9% of the cases, the call occurred during a crisis. The PC team solved 92.9% of the problems. Only 20 patients were admitted in the emergency department (this was 30.5% less compared to 2019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TC is a feasible alternative to traditional in-person follow-ups. Callers considered it very useful, especially during the COVID-19 lockdown. Communication was improved and admissions to emergency services were reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"29 12","pages":"571-577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2023.29.12.571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To describe the use of a telephone consultation (TC) hotline for palliative care (PC) patients and their families at home provided by a PC service, during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Methods: Observational and cross-sectional study of a TC hotline performed by a PC service from 1 January to 31 December 2020. Data was collected through a record sheet completed during the call. Descriptive analyses were performed using the SPSS software (V.21 for Windows).

Results: A total of 494 calls were retrieved (n=187 patients; 6500 minutes recorded). Compared to 2019, incoming calls increased 33.8%. Most callers were a family member (n=419) or a community health worker (n= 60). The peak of calls was registered in April (13.5%), May (13.2%) and October (15.0%). Main problems included uncontrolled symptoms (81.9%), need for medication (8.6%), information (4.8%) and consultation rescheduling (2.6%). In 81.9% of the cases, the call occurred during a crisis. The PC team solved 92.9% of the problems. Only 20 patients were admitted in the emergency department (this was 30.5% less compared to 2019).

Conclusions: The TC is a feasible alternative to traditional in-person follow-ups. Callers considered it very useful, especially during the COVID-19 lockdown. Communication was improved and admissions to emergency services were reduced.

针对居家姑息关怀患者及其家属的电话热线分析。
背景:描述在 COVID-19 封锁期间,由姑息关怀(PC)服务机构为居家姑息关怀(PC)患者及其家属提供的电话咨询热线的使用情况:描述在COVID-19封锁期间,由姑息关怀(PC)服务机构为居家姑息关怀(PC)患者及其家属提供的电话咨询热线(TC)的使用情况:观察性横断面研究:2020 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间由 PC 服务机构提供的电话咨询热线。数据通过通话过程中填写的记录表收集。使用 SPSS 软件(V.21 for Windows)进行描述性分析:共检索到 494 个呼叫(n=187 名患者;记录时间 6500 分钟)。与 2019 年相比,来电增加了 33.8%。大多数来电者是家庭成员(人数=419)或社区卫生工作者(人数=60)。来电高峰出现在四月(13.5%)、五月(13.2%)和十月(15.0%)。主要问题包括症状未得到控制(81.9%)、需要药物(8.6%)、信息(4.8%)和重新安排就诊时间(2.6%)。在 81.9% 的病例中,电话都是在危机时刻打来的。PC 团队解决了 92.9% 的问题。急诊科仅收治了 20 名患者(与 2019 年相比减少了 30.5%):TC 是传统面对面随访的可行替代方案。来电者认为它非常有用,尤其是在 COVID-19 封锁期间。沟通得到了改善,急诊入院人数也有所减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信