Play brick therapy to aid the social skills of children and young people with autism spectrum disorder: the I-SOCIALISE cluster RCT.

Barry Wright, Ellen Kingsley, Cindy Cooper, Katie Biggs, Matthew Bursnall, Han-I Wang, Tim Chater, Elizabeth Coates, M Dawn Teare, Kirsty McKendrick, Gina Gomez de la Cuesta, Amy Barr, Kiera Solaiman, Anna Packham, David Marshall, Danielle Varley, Roshanak Nekooi, Steve Parrott, Shehzad Ali, Simon Gilbody, Ann Le Couteur
{"title":"Play brick therapy to aid the social skills of children and young people with autism spectrum disorder: the I-SOCIALISE cluster RCT.","authors":"Barry Wright, Ellen Kingsley, Cindy Cooper, Katie Biggs, Matthew Bursnall, Han-I Wang, Tim Chater, Elizabeth Coates, M Dawn Teare, Kirsty McKendrick, Gina Gomez de la Cuesta, Amy Barr, Kiera Solaiman, Anna Packham, David Marshall, Danielle Varley, Roshanak Nekooi, Steve Parrott, Shehzad Ali, Simon Gilbody, Ann Le Couteur","doi":"10.3310/VGTR7431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social skills interventions are commonly recommended to help children and young people with autism spectrum disorder develop social skills, but some struggle to engage in these interventions. LEGO<sup>®</sup> (LEGO System A/S, Billund, Denmark) based therapy, a group social skills intervention, aims to be more interesting and engaging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of LEGO<sup>®</sup> based therapy on the social and emotional skills of children and young people with autism spectrum disorder in school settings compared with usual support. Secondary objectives included evaluations of cost-effectiveness, acceptability and treatment fidelity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cluster randomised controlled trial randomly allocating participating schools to either LEGO<sup>®</sup> based therapy and usual support or usual support only.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Mainstream schools in the north of England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children and young people (aged 7-15 years) with autism spectrum disorder, their parent/guardian, an associated teacher/teaching assistant and a facilitator teacher/teaching assistant (intervention schools only).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Schools randomised to the intervention arm delivered 12 weekly sessions of LEGO<sup>®</sup> based therapy, which promotes collaborative play and encourages social problem-solving in groups of three children and young people with a facilitator (trained teacher or teaching assistant). Participants received usual support from school and community services. Participants in the control arm received usual support only. Research assistants and statisticians were blind to treatment allocation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The social skills subscale of the Social Skills Improvement System (SSIS), completed by the children and young people's unblinded teacher pre randomisation and 20 weeks post randomisation. The SSIS social skills subscale measures social skills including social communication, co-operation, empathy, assertion, responsibility and self-control. Participants completed a number of other pre- and post-randomisation measures of emotional health, quality of life, loneliness, problem behaviours, academic competence, service resource utilisation and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 children and young people from 98 schools were randomised: 127 to the intervention arm and 123 to the control arm. Intention-to-treat analysis of the main outcome measure showed a modest positive difference of 3.74 points (95% confidence interval -0.16 to 7.63 points, standardised effect size 0.18; <i>p</i> = 0.06) in favour of the intervention arm. Statistical significance increased in per-protocol analysis, with a modest positive difference (standardised effect size 0.21; <i>p</i> = 0.036). Cost-effectiveness of the intervention was found in reduced service use costs and a small increase in quality-adjusted life-years. Intervention fidelity and acceptability were positive. No intervention-related adverse events or effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary and pre-planned sensitivity analysis of the primary outcome consistently showed a positive clinical difference, with modest standardised effect sizes of between 0.15 and 0.21. There were positive health economics and qualitative findings, corroborated by the difference between arms for the majority of secondary outcomes, which were not statistically significant but favoured the intervention arm. Post hoc additional analysis was exploratory and was not used in drawing this conclusion. Given the small positive change, LEGO<sup>®</sup> based therapy for children and young people with autism spectrum disorder in schools should be considered.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The primary outcome measure was completed by an unblinded teacher (rather than by the facilitator).</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>The study team recommends future research into LEGO<sup>®</sup> based therapy, particularly in school environments.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered as ISRCTN64852382.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: 15/49/32) and is published in full in <i>Public Health Research</i>; Vol. 11, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":"11 12","pages":"1-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/VGTR7431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social skills interventions are commonly recommended to help children and young people with autism spectrum disorder develop social skills, but some struggle to engage in these interventions. LEGO® (LEGO System A/S, Billund, Denmark) based therapy, a group social skills intervention, aims to be more interesting and engaging.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of LEGO® based therapy on the social and emotional skills of children and young people with autism spectrum disorder in school settings compared with usual support. Secondary objectives included evaluations of cost-effectiveness, acceptability and treatment fidelity.

Design: A cluster randomised controlled trial randomly allocating participating schools to either LEGO® based therapy and usual support or usual support only.

Setting: Mainstream schools in the north of England.

Participants: Children and young people (aged 7-15 years) with autism spectrum disorder, their parent/guardian, an associated teacher/teaching assistant and a facilitator teacher/teaching assistant (intervention schools only).

Intervention: Schools randomised to the intervention arm delivered 12 weekly sessions of LEGO® based therapy, which promotes collaborative play and encourages social problem-solving in groups of three children and young people with a facilitator (trained teacher or teaching assistant). Participants received usual support from school and community services. Participants in the control arm received usual support only. Research assistants and statisticians were blind to treatment allocation.

Main outcome measure: The social skills subscale of the Social Skills Improvement System (SSIS), completed by the children and young people's unblinded teacher pre randomisation and 20 weeks post randomisation. The SSIS social skills subscale measures social skills including social communication, co-operation, empathy, assertion, responsibility and self-control. Participants completed a number of other pre- and post-randomisation measures of emotional health, quality of life, loneliness, problem behaviours, academic competence, service resource utilisation and adverse events.

Results: A total of 250 children and young people from 98 schools were randomised: 127 to the intervention arm and 123 to the control arm. Intention-to-treat analysis of the main outcome measure showed a modest positive difference of 3.74 points (95% confidence interval -0.16 to 7.63 points, standardised effect size 0.18; p = 0.06) in favour of the intervention arm. Statistical significance increased in per-protocol analysis, with a modest positive difference (standardised effect size 0.21; p = 0.036). Cost-effectiveness of the intervention was found in reduced service use costs and a small increase in quality-adjusted life-years. Intervention fidelity and acceptability were positive. No intervention-related adverse events or effects were reported.

Conclusions: The primary and pre-planned sensitivity analysis of the primary outcome consistently showed a positive clinical difference, with modest standardised effect sizes of between 0.15 and 0.21. There were positive health economics and qualitative findings, corroborated by the difference between arms for the majority of secondary outcomes, which were not statistically significant but favoured the intervention arm. Post hoc additional analysis was exploratory and was not used in drawing this conclusion. Given the small positive change, LEGO® based therapy for children and young people with autism spectrum disorder in schools should be considered.

Limitations: The primary outcome measure was completed by an unblinded teacher (rather than by the facilitator).

Future work: The study team recommends future research into LEGO® based therapy, particularly in school environments.

Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN64852382.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: 15/49/32) and is published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 11, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

帮助患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童和青少年掌握社交技能的游戏砖疗法:I-SOCIALISE 群组研究试验。
背景:通常建议采取社交技能干预措施来帮助患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童和青少年发展社交技能,但有些儿童和青少年在参与这些干预措施时会遇到困难。基于乐高®(LEGO System A/S, Billund, Denmark)的疗法是一种团体社交技能干预方法,旨在提高趣味性和参与性:目的:评估乐高®疗法与常规疗法相比,对学校环境中患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童和青少年的社交和情感技能的临床效果。次要目标包括评估成本效益、可接受性和治疗忠诚度:设计:群组随机对照试验,将参与试验的学校随机分配到基于乐高®的疗法和常规支持或仅常规支持中:环境:英格兰北部的主流学校:患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童和青少年(7-15 岁)、他们的家长/监护人、一名相关教师/教学助理和一名辅导教师/教学助理(仅干预学校):干预措施:被随机分配到干预组的学校每周提供 12 节乐高®治疗课程,促进协作游戏,鼓励儿童和青少年在主持人(经过培训的教师或助教)的带领下,以三人一组的方式解决社会问题。参与者通常会得到学校和社区服务机构的支持。对照组的参与者只接受常规支持。研究助理和统计人员对治疗分配保密。主要结果测量指标:社交技能改进系统(SSIS)的社交技能分量表,由儿童和青少年的非盲人教师在随机分配前和随机分配后20周完成。SSIS 社交技能分量表测量的社交技能包括社交沟通、合作、移情、自信、责任感和自我控制能力。参与者在随机前和随机后还完成了其他一些关于情绪健康、生活质量、孤独感、问题行为、学习能力、服务资源利用率和不良事件的测量:共有来自98所学校的250名儿童和青少年接受了随机治疗:127人接受干预治疗,123人接受对照治疗。对主要结果进行的意向治疗分析显示,干预组与对照组有3.74分的微弱正差异(95%置信区间为-0.16分至7.63分,标准化效应大小为0.18;P = 0.06)。在按方案分析中,统计显著性有所提高,出现了适度的正差异(标准化效应大小为 0.21;p = 0.036)。干预的成本效益体现在服务使用成本的降低和质量调整生命年的小幅增加。干预的忠实性和可接受性都是积极的。没有报告与干预相关的不良事件或影响:主要结果的主要分析和预先计划的敏感性分析均显示出积极的临床差异,标准化效应大小介于 0.15 和 0.21 之间。健康经济学和定性分析也有积极的发现,大多数次要结果的两臂间差异也证实了这一点,这些差异在统计学上并不显著,但有利于干预组。事后补充分析是探索性的,没有用于得出这一结论。考虑到这些微小的积极变化,应考虑为学校中患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童和青少年提供基于乐高®的治疗:局限性:主要结果测量由一名未蒙蔽的教师完成(而不是由主持人完成):研究小组建议今后对基于乐高®的疗法进行研究,尤其是在学校环境中:本试验的注册号为 ISRCTN64852382:该奖项由美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)公共卫生研究计划资助(NIHR奖项编号:15/49/32),全文发表于《公共卫生研究》第11卷第12期。如需了解更多奖项信息,请访问 NIHR Funding and Awards 网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信