Genetic research with Indigenous Peoples: perspectives on governance and oversight in the US.

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2023-11-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2023.1286948
Nanibaa' A Garrison, Stephanie Russo Carroll
{"title":"Genetic research with Indigenous Peoples: perspectives on governance and oversight in the US.","authors":"Nanibaa' A Garrison, Stephanie Russo Carroll","doi":"10.3389/frma.2023.1286948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Indigenous Peoples are increasingly exerting governance and oversight over genomic research with citizens of their nations, raising questions about how best to enforce research regulation between American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian peoples and researchers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a community-engaged research approach, we conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with Tribal leaders, clinicians, researchers, policy makers, and Tribal research review board members about their perspectives on ethical issues related to genetics research with Indigenous Peoples in the US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We report findings related to (1) considerations for Indigenous governance, (2) institutional relationships upholding sovereignty, (3) expectations for research approvals, and (4) agreements enacting Indigenous governance. Participants described concerns about different ways of exerting oversight, relationships and agreements between Indigenous Peoples and researchers, and gaps that need to be addressed to strengthen existing governance of genomic data.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results will ultimately guide policy-making and development of new strategies for Indigenous Peoples to enforce oversight in research to promote ethically and culturally appropriate research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"8 ","pages":"1286948"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10702594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1286948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Indigenous Peoples are increasingly exerting governance and oversight over genomic research with citizens of their nations, raising questions about how best to enforce research regulation between American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian peoples and researchers.

Methods: Using a community-engaged research approach, we conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with Tribal leaders, clinicians, researchers, policy makers, and Tribal research review board members about their perspectives on ethical issues related to genetics research with Indigenous Peoples in the US.

Results: We report findings related to (1) considerations for Indigenous governance, (2) institutional relationships upholding sovereignty, (3) expectations for research approvals, and (4) agreements enacting Indigenous governance. Participants described concerns about different ways of exerting oversight, relationships and agreements between Indigenous Peoples and researchers, and gaps that need to be addressed to strengthen existing governance of genomic data.

Discussion: The results will ultimately guide policy-making and development of new strategies for Indigenous Peoples to enforce oversight in research to promote ethically and culturally appropriate research.

与原住民的基因研究:美国治理和监督的视角。
导言:原住民正越来越多地管理和监督针对本民族公民的基因组研究,这就提出了如何最好地在美国印第安人、阿拉斯加原住民和夏威夷原住民与研究人员之间实施研究监管的问题:我们采用社区参与的研究方法,对部落领导人、临床医生、研究人员、政策制定者和部落研究审查委员会成员进行了 42 次半结构式访谈,了解他们对美国土著居民遗传学研究相关伦理问题的看法:我们报告了与以下方面相关的研究结果:(1)土著治理的考虑因素;(2)维护主权的机构关系;(3)对研究审批的期望;以及(4)颁布土著治理的协议。参与者描述了对不同监督方式的担忧、土著居民与研究人员之间的关系和协议,以及为加强现有基因组数据管理而需要解决的差距:讨论:研究结果将最终指导土著居民的决策和新策略的制定,以便在研究中实施监督,促进符合伦理和文化的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信