Elise M Walck-Shannon, Shaina F Rowell, April E Bednarski, Ashton M Barber, Grace J Yuan, Regina F Frey
{"title":"A Study Planning Exercise Associated with Decreased Distraction Levels among Introductory Biology Students.","authors":"Elise M Walck-Shannon, Shaina F Rowell, April E Bednarski, Ashton M Barber, Grace J Yuan, Regina F Frey","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-05-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Students struggle to regulate their learning during independent study sessions. In this study, we ask whether an online behavioral intervention helped introductory students decrease distraction while studying. The intervention consisted of exam 1 reflection, exam 2 planning, and exam 2 reflection exercises. During planning, students formed a goal, mentally contrasted (MC) a positive outcome of their goal to their present reality, identified an obstacle, and formed an implementation intention (II) to overcome that obstacle. During reflection, students self-reported their distraction while studying. Distraction was the most frequently reported study <u>obstacle</u>, and decreasing distraction was the second most frequently reported study <u>goal</u>. While students who aimed to decrease distraction as a goal did not follow through, students who planned for distraction obstacles did follow through on decreasing distraction levels. Only about half of students generated an II that aligned with their study goal, which may provide one reason for the opposing follow-through of distraction framed as a goal versus as an obstacle. Lastly, we examined the <u>specificity</u> of students' II's and found no relationship with follow-through. Overall, MC with II holds promise as a self-regulatory technique to help introductory biology students change their behaviors while studying.</p>","PeriodicalId":56321,"journal":{"name":"Cbe-Life Sciences Education","volume":"23 1","pages":"ar3"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10956610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cbe-Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.23-05-0092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Students struggle to regulate their learning during independent study sessions. In this study, we ask whether an online behavioral intervention helped introductory students decrease distraction while studying. The intervention consisted of exam 1 reflection, exam 2 planning, and exam 2 reflection exercises. During planning, students formed a goal, mentally contrasted (MC) a positive outcome of their goal to their present reality, identified an obstacle, and formed an implementation intention (II) to overcome that obstacle. During reflection, students self-reported their distraction while studying. Distraction was the most frequently reported study obstacle, and decreasing distraction was the second most frequently reported study goal. While students who aimed to decrease distraction as a goal did not follow through, students who planned for distraction obstacles did follow through on decreasing distraction levels. Only about half of students generated an II that aligned with their study goal, which may provide one reason for the opposing follow-through of distraction framed as a goal versus as an obstacle. Lastly, we examined the specificity of students' II's and found no relationship with follow-through. Overall, MC with II holds promise as a self-regulatory technique to help introductory biology students change their behaviors while studying.
学生在自主学习过程中很难调节自己的学习状态。在本研究中,我们探讨了在线行为干预是否有助于入门学生减少学习时的分心。干预包括考试 1 反思、考试 2 计划和考试 2 反思练习。在计划过程中,学生形成目标,将目标的积极结果与当前现实进行心理对比(MC),找出障碍,并形成克服障碍的实施意向(II)。在反思过程中,学生们自我报告了学习时的分心情况。分心是最常报告的学习障碍,而减少分心是第二常报告的学习目标。以减少分心为目标的学生没有付诸实践,而计划减少分心障碍的学生则付诸实践,减少了分心程度。只有大约一半的学生产生了与他们的学习目标一致的 II,这可能是将分心作为目标与作为障碍的贯彻情况截然相反的原因之一。最后,我们检查了学生 II 的具体内容,发现与后续行动没有关系。总之,带有 II 的 MC 有望成为一种自我调节技术,帮助生物入门学生改变学习行为。
期刊介绍:
CBE—Life Sciences Education (LSE), a free, online quarterly journal, is published by the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB). The journal was launched in spring 2002 as Cell Biology Education—A Journal of Life Science Education. The ASCB changed the name of the journal in spring 2006 to better reflect the breadth of its readership and the scope of its submissions.
LSE publishes peer-reviewed articles on life science education at the K–12, undergraduate, and graduate levels. The ASCB believes that learning in biology encompasses diverse fields, including math, chemistry, physics, engineering, computer science, and the interdisciplinary intersections of biology with these fields. Within biology, LSE focuses on how students are introduced to the study of life sciences, as well as approaches in cell biology, developmental biology, neuroscience, biochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, genomics, bioinformatics, and proteomics.